• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Huntsman Bags Big Bundlers

J

Jeezy

DP Veteran
Joined
May 21, 2011
Messages
1,327
Reaction score
1,166
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
Huntsman Bags Some Big Bundlers - Washington Wire - WSJ

A list of prominent Huntsman bundlers obtained by Washington Wire includes Georgette Mosbacher, a former Republican National Committee finance co-chairman, and John Mack, the Morgan Stanley chairman who was a big backer of President George W. Bush in 2004 but then switched parties to support Ms. Clinton in 2008.
Click to expand...

SAVE US, JON, SAVE US! :3oops:
 
I can't wat to see nim in action and what he believes in.

I hope that all those who are running or will run do something Ronald Reagan was credited as saying. Speak no ill of your fellow Republicans, but in many cases that is already in the toilet.
 
Huntsman is running and I am glad-He will take votes from Romney. It will be interesting to see those big money machines go at it.

This guy is a moderate though and not who we need as the nominee.
 
Bigfoot 88 said:
Huntsman is running and I am glad-He will take votes from Romney. It will be interesting to see those big money machines go at it.

This guy is a moderate though and not who we need as the nominee.
Click to expand...

Oh?

...and why not?
 
Bigfoot 88 said:
He is a moderate
Click to expand...

...

I asked why we don't need a moderate and you answered "...because he is a moderate."

Doesn't really shed much light on the situation, does it?
 
Jeezy said:
...

I asked why we don't need a moderate and you answered "...because he is a moderate."

Doesn't really shed much light on the situation, does it?
Click to expand...

I thought you were asking why he shouldn't be the nominee

We don't need a moderate because we went that route last time and it didn't work out. I believe there needs to be a clear difference between what the candidates stand for.
 
Bigfoot 88 said:
I thought you were asking why he shouldn't be the nominee

We don't need a moderate because we went that route last time and it didn't work out. I believe there needs to be a clear difference between what the candidates stand for.
Click to expand...

The route we went last time was sticking a man who the party establishment had no love for into the position of "fall guy" for George Bush's unpopularity. No Republican could have been seen as a moderate in 2008, because he was standing in the shadow of the previous president. McCain's "moderation" had nothing to do with his loss.

In fact, his moderation is probably what kept the race as close as it was. If a man like Herman Cain had won the primary, the Obama's victory would have been much more lopsided.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom