• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

John McCain: Sarah Palin Can Beat Obama In 2012

Romney has proved he will play along to get along. So hes getting more support.

It can be argued that Palin has more substance via experience and speeches and alternate media than Obama had when he first ran as a candidate.

She doesn't have any substance on policy. I don't care how the media is lapping up her crap.

Death panels has been an always will be a lie.
 
Last edited:
Which means she doesnt have any substance on issues that you like, not that she doesnt have any.
There is a difference and its not what has been argued repeatedly.
 
Which means she doesnt have any substance on issues that you like, not that she doesnt have any.
There is a difference and its not what has been argued repeatedly.

No, she only has talking points. I read your links, talking point expanded into paragraphs for a speech. No substance, no solutions purposed, nothing,.
 
No, she only has talking points. I read your links, talking point expanded into paragraphs for a speech. No substance, no solutions purposed, nothing,.

Xpiher... Looks like you might have similar perspective as mine. I'm not "Anti-Palin", but rather "I'm Pro-Intelligence."
 
Back
Top Bottom