• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

White House: Limited Role in Libya Means No Need to Get Congressional Authorization

Re: White House: Limited Role in Libya Means No Need to Get Congressional Authorizati

You are either with us or you are with the terrorist............

I sort of miss being afraid and having someone tell me I am a terrorist if I don't agree with their point of views.

Thanks again George for those 8 wonderful (fearful) years.
Hmm. I may have to reconsider my not liking G.W. Bush.
 
Re: White House: Limited Role in Libya Means No Need to Get Congressional Authorizati

So you're claiming that despite any actual legislation defining the presidents power as such, that various opinions of congressional committees amount to actual law?

Seems rather weak, to say the least

PS you still haven't quoted anything lending legitimacy to your interpretation Of Obama's statement

How weak that is might relate to how little congress has done.

However, my claim is there is disagreement as to whether he violated law, and the mere fact that Obama and his people give a rationale supports that, whether you agree with their reasoning or not. Above, to which you answered, also shows disagreement with your claim.
 
Re: White House: Limited Role in Libya Means No Need to Get Congressional Authorizati

Nobody remembers the "Axis of Evil" rhetoric? IMO they are all fare game when it comes to legalities".

Do you think the countries referred to aren't 'evil' in the way they treat their people? Do you support the dictatorship of North Korea, for example?
You are either with us or you are with the terrorist............

And you have difficulty deciding?

Perhaps you should read the entire speech, it's not that long, and get a feeling of the context of what was said and the words he used. Otherwise you may as well live in an axis-of-evil country where people there is no access to a free media.
 
Back
Top Bottom