- Joined
- Jun 23, 2009
- Messages
- 133,631
- Reaction score
- 30,937
- Location
- Bagdad, La.
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Very Conservative
Re: White House: Limited Role in Libya Means No Need to Get Congressional Authorizati
I'm not saying any of that. What I am saying, is that unless American combat units have been in theater for the past 90 days, without Congressional approval, Obama isn't in violation of the law.
And, anyone that can't tell us what units are currently deployed to the TO and still insists that Obama is breaking the law, is talking out they booty.
The next step in this debate should be to find out which--if any--units are operating in Libya and then debate whether, or not, Obama broke the law.
I'm trying to follow your thought,
SO
we didnt break the 60 day rule, therfore he doesnt have to go to congress.
BUT
his reasoning was to stop innocents from being killed,
SO
either you think he can stop start stop start, resetting the 60 day rule
OR
he FAILED, because last I checked innocent are still getting killed
are you ok?
really?
I'm not saying any of that. What I am saying, is that unless American combat units have been in theater for the past 90 days, without Congressional approval, Obama isn't in violation of the law.
And, anyone that can't tell us what units are currently deployed to the TO and still insists that Obama is breaking the law, is talking out they booty.
The next step in this debate should be to find out which--if any--units are operating in Libya and then debate whether, or not, Obama broke the law.