ask the attorney general, syd
unless HE's scared of you too
LOL!
LOL!
if there's no evidence then why would the ig report say, "waterboarding and sleep deprivation were the two most powerful techniques and elicited a lot of information"
and why would doj sign off
think much?
There are any number of reasons. But the point is, I can and have proved evidence to the contrary. Why can't you at least equal it? :coffeepap
:beer: > :coffeepap: = you lose :lamo
There are any number of reasons
LOL!
how many reasons---waterboarding and sleep deprivation were the two most powerful techniques and elicited a lot of information---let me count the ways
LOL!
the ig already did, syd
a hundred times
you STILL expect THE CIA to give you specific intel?
LOL!
why, you'll see the DEATH PHOTOS of ubl long before you're gonna get your little australian eyes on spy reports outta langley
i'd be stunned anyone could be so naive if i didn't know new south wales so well
meanwhile, preeminent source means preeminent source, sydney
waterboarding elicited a lot of information means waterboarding elicited a lot of information
it's english language, even in detroit
and eric holder is the dept that did the reporting
sorry
think much?
Do you have anything?
no, but eric holder does
How do you know?
LOL!
cuz that's what the report said, silly
"waterboarding elicited a lot of information"
it's pretty straight forward, at least this side of new south wales
The Washingon Post is not a report
LOL!
wapo's ARTICLE is based on and QUOTES the ig report
y'know, the one PUBLISHED by ERIC HOLDER
the one that says in detroit's own english, "waterboarding elicited a lot of information"
those aren't wapo's words, silly
they're the INSPECTOR GENERAL'S
read much?
LOL!
ask peter finn
I'm asking you. Link the IG report. :coffeepap
aks away
LOL!
"waterboarding elicited a lot of information:" ig report released by eric holder, monday preceding aug 29, 2009
There is a lot of redaction