• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Osama Bin Laden is dead

ask the attorney general, syd

unless HE's scared of you too

LOL!
 
LOL!

if there's no evidence then why would the ig report say, "waterboarding and sleep deprivation were the two most powerful techniques and elicited a lot of information"

and why would doj sign off

think much?
 
The Prof said:
LOL!

if there's no evidence then why would the ig report say, "waterboarding and sleep deprivation were the two most powerful techniques and elicited a lot of information"

and why would doj sign off

think much?
Click to expand...

There are any number of reasons. But the point is, I can and have proved evidence to the contrary. Why can't you at least equal it? :coffeepap
 
Boo Radley said:
There are any number of reasons. But the point is, I can and have proved evidence to the contrary. Why can't you at least equal it? :coffeepap
Click to expand...

:beer: > :coffeepap: = you lose :lamo
 
Boo Radley said:
There are any number of reasons
Click to expand...

LOL!

how many reasons---waterboarding and sleep deprivation were the two most powerful techniques and elicited a lot of information---let me count the ways
 
The Prof said:
LOL!

how many reasons---waterboarding and sleep deprivation were the two most powerful techniques and elicited a lot of information---let me count the ways
Click to expand...

That's the claim, now where's the support? I'm asking you to present some. :coffeepap
 
LOL!

the ig already did, syd

a hundred times
 
The Prof said:
LOL!

the ig already did, syd

a hundred times
Click to expand...

No, they didn't. Repeating the claim is not equal to giving a specifc intel received. I hope you know this. :coffeepap
 
you STILL expect THE CIA to give you specific intel?

LOL!

why, you'll see the DEATH PHOTOS of ubl long before you're gonna get your little australian eyes on spy reports outta langley

i'd be stunned anyone could be so naive if i didn't know new south wales so well

meanwhile, preeminent source means preeminent source, sydney

waterboarding elicited a lot of information means waterboarding elicited a lot of information

it's english language, even in detroit

and eric holder is the dept that did the reporting

sorry

think much?
 
The Prof said:
you STILL expect THE CIA to give you specific intel?

LOL!

why, you'll see the DEATH PHOTOS of ubl long before you're gonna get your little australian eyes on spy reports outta langley

i'd be stunned anyone could be so naive if i didn't know new south wales so well

meanwhile, preeminent source means preeminent source, sydney

waterboarding elicited a lot of information means waterboarding elicited a lot of information

it's english language, even in detroit

and eric holder is the dept that did the reporting

sorry

think much?
Click to expand...

Got specifics on misinformation. Doesn't seem impossible. Again, do you have any? Without it, how do you know. We had efforts at deception before. Do you have anything? :coffeepap
 
The Prof said:
no, but eric holder does
Click to expand...

How do you know? When asked for misinofrmation, we cna link the specifics. Why can't we do the same with this supposed intel? :coffeepap
 
Boo Radley said:
How do you know?
Click to expand...

LOL!

cuz that's what the report said, silly

"waterboarding elicited a lot of information"

it's pretty straight forward, at least this side of new south wales
 
The Prof said:
LOL!

cuz that's what the report said, silly

"waterboarding elicited a lot of information"

it's pretty straight forward, at least this side of new south wales
Click to expand...

The Washingon Post is not a report. Link the report. And ask about self interest and support within the report. :coffeepap
 
Boo Radley said:
The Washingon Post is not a report
Click to expand...

LOL!

wapo's ARTICLE is based on and QUOTES the ig report

y'know, the one PUBLISHED by ERIC HOLDER

the one that says in detroit's own english, "waterboarding elicited a lot of information"

those aren't wapo's words, silly

they're the INSPECTOR GENERAL'S

read much?
 
The Prof said:
LOL!

wapo's ARTICLE is based on and QUOTES the ig report

y'know, the one PUBLISHED by ERIC HOLDER

the one that says in detroit's own english, "waterboarding elicited a lot of information"

those aren't wapo's words, silly

they're the INSPECTOR GENERAL'S

read much?
Click to expand...

Then link the IG report. I'll wait. :coffeepap
 
LOL!

ask peter finn
 
peter fenn already did, syd

don't you OPEN links outta OUR capital?

LOL!

"waterboarding and sleep deprivation were the two most powerful techniques and elicited a lot of information:" cia ig report released by eric holder, aug, 2009
 
aks away

LOL!

"waterboarding elicited a lot of information:" ig report released by eric holder, monday preceding aug 29, 2009
 
The Prof said:
aks away

LOL!

"waterboarding elicited a lot of information:" ig report released by eric holder, monday preceding aug 29, 2009
Click to expand...

Yet, you can't link the report. :coffeepap
 
Boo Radley said:
There is a lot of redaction
Click to expand...

ah, so you FOUND it

LOL!

finally

"waterboarding and sleep deprivation were the two most powerful techniques and elicited a lot of information"

says the ig in the report released by DOJ on the monday preceding aug 29, 2009

why would HOLDER would sign off on such language?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom