Actually hundreds of Muslims were killed in that attack.
Just in case you failed to notice, EVERYONE who died in those attacks died in the United States. NO international body, and by NO the Mayor means none, zero, nada, the next integer smaller than 1, has any jurisdiction in the matter, and most especially not any body comprised of the religious faiths of the criminals who committed the acts.
The matter was a crime in the United States and an act of war upon the United States. It was not an international crime and it was not an act of war involving the "nations of the world".
Furthermore, Muslims are more likely to die of a terrorist attack than non-Muslims.
Sounds fair. Ain't got nothing to do with the fact that Osama bin Laden, if captured by US forces, would have been rightly subjected to the American judicial system, one subset of which are US military tribunals.
If muslims insist on tolerating terrorists in their midst, they're going to suffer from Islamic terrorism.
And you have entirely failed to address my point. If you do not want to reply to what I said, DO NOT REPLY TO ME.
The points you make are being replied to. If you do not want the points you make replied to, stop posting.
That others are capable of seeing the points you make even though you do not isn't their problem.
And how many had globally aired video confessions taking responsibility for their acts with hard evidence of planning, funding and training?
Johnny Cochran would have had anything a silly as that tossed out on a technicality. The Mayor notes you refuse to discuss the one terrorism case Eric Holder actually tried in federal court.
Wow. You really have no idea how modern Islamic terrorist cells work do you?
Wow. You really have no idea how human societies organize and interact, do you? Especially primitive organizations such as those exemplified by tribal warlords and religios cult leaders. They may not have their dick in every pie, because of security concerns, but they're going to be aware of what's in the oven and who the chief bakers are.
Caveman? Was the IRA a bunch of cavemen?
Yes.
Was the French Resistance to the Nazi a bunch of cavemen?
You mean, after their compatriots surrendered without firing a shot? Yeah, prettty much. The Nazis certainly were. You're going to insist on not noticing that bin Laden was, in fact, shooting video from caves and mountains, aren't you?
Your views are so simplistic and so ignorant of history that's laughable an adult would even have them.
That's what you have? You're complaining that bin Laden was shot, and complaining that others are pointing out possible benefits and problems, and thereby challenging your perpetual "wish the US hadn't done that" position you're famous for?
Too bad.
It was the best thing possible that bin Laden was shot, dead, by an American, in his home. The negatives associated with that outcome are less severe than the negatives associated with the alternatives, as has been pointed out.
So you think that we will be fighting this conflict forever? I'm not pushing policy that keeps billions flowing out of our coffers and thousands paying with their lives. You are.
You don't have to be pushing policy. No one can recall voting for anyone named "obvious Child". Also, given that the conflict is driven by intolerant religious fanatics willing to use their own children as bomb delivery devices, the end of this conflict is not on the horizon, and shall not be until the process of natural selection eliminates the fanatics from the gene pool. The situation in the Islamic world does not bode well for any assumption of a rapid termination of this conflict.
As if nearly ten years of internecine warfar doesn't already show that.
Perhaps you could try to learn something of history and human nature?
