• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Obama to speak on birth certificate

:lamo Who me? Why that is shocking! :shock:


Yes, I am usually partisan, I prefer to call it true to my principles and values, unlike libs, and so called Independents, Others, Moderates, and (Insert fence sitter denotation here). See rather than base my arguments on holding my finger to the wind, or emotion of the time, I like to base my politics on standards, and the constitution.

Partisan is not such a bad thing, are you telling me that you or anyone else in here is not?

j-mac

I think you're working with a different definition of partisan than I am. Being partisan is changing your principles based on who's being discussed, even if the situation is nearly identical. This is the opposition of "principles and values." Far from being something to be proud of, this is a character flaw, and it tells people that you can only be relied on to take the position of a chosen side, not the position based on the facts at hand.
 
Oh, so tell me, since you are separating into certain classes who can speak out, and who can't, how is that determination made?

j-mac

You make another leap j. A silly leap. Anyone can talk silly ****, but if you don't want a distraction, quit making a fuss over silliness. You missed the point completely and jump all the way to something not only not said, but not even hinted out. Obama wasn't causing the distraction, Trump and silly birthers who keep going on it about were and are. So if you think it's a distraction, your focus should be on them.
 
OMG! I thought it was funny that the Regstrar's name was that of a popular string instrument used for singing Hawaiian songs at parties.

good god, I have already said I was poking fun....Me thinks you sycophants are way too sensitive.

j-mac

I asked you a question. I didn't make any charges... and IMO it looks short hand. I didn't make the connection. Khlee is a last name... and U. Khlee could be the name.

Kyle Khlee | Facebook
Wauna Khlee - Longview, WA | MyLife&#8482

I can't really make out any of the signatures though. They all look sloppy to me.
 
You make another leap j. A silly leap. Anyone can talk silly ****, but if you don't want a distraction, quit making a fuss over silliness. You missed the point completely and jump all the way to something not only not said, but not even hinted out. Obama wasn't causing the distraction, Trump and silly birthers who keep going on it about were and are. So if you think it's a distraction, your focus should be on them.


Really? You didn't say this:

An Obama distraction? Now that's a reach. All birthers had to was shut up.

See I don't think it is up to you to tell people to "shut up"

j-mac
 
I asked you a question. I didn't make any charges... and IMO it looks short hand. I didn't make the connection. Khlee is a last name... and U. Khlee could be the name.

Kyle Khlee | Facebook
Wauna Khlee - Longview, WA | MyLife&#8482

I can't really make out any of the signatures though. They all look sloppy to me.

I think it is absolutely hilarious that you are taking me seriously right now.....Gheeze, lighten up will ya?

j-mac
 
I think you're working with a different definition of partisan than I am. Being partisan is changing your principles based on who's being discussed, even if the situation is nearly identical. This is the opposition of "principles and values." Far from being something to be proud of, this is a character flaw, and it tells people that you can only be relied on to take the position of a chosen side, not the position based on the facts at hand.

Hmmm....Another know it all that thinks that he can sum someone up within a post or two based on his own greatness in his own mind....pfft...Go away son you bother me.

j-mac
 
Really? You didn't say this:



See I don't think it is up to you to tell people to "shut up"

j-mac

Reading comperhension is a good thing j. See the word HAD? It's not an order to shut up. Instead is is explaining that if they did not want it as a distraction, all they HAD to do was shut up. Your side really has to stop leapoing to sillivile with every comment. Read with the purpose of trying to understand. :coffeepap
 
Are you saying that Obama didn't send back the bust of Churchill?

j-mac

According to this article he has a bust of Abraham Lincoln's in it's place, and that Churchill's bust was removed before Obama's inauguration as part of the usual changeover operations. Every president puts his own stamp on the Oval Office, and Bush only put that in the office when Tony Blair sent it to him...

Obama Returns Churchill Bust To England: British Press Sees Snub

I think Ptif is taking is far by claiming the president's Oval Office decoration cost him an invitation to the Royal Wedding. I don't find it embarrassing in the least that the POTUS didn't go to that wedding. I personally didn't care much about the wedding, and most people in the UK didn't either... :shrug:
 
Reading comperhension is a good thing j. See the word HAD? It's not an order to shut up. Instead is is explaining that if they did not want it as a distraction, all they HAD to do was shut up. Your side really has to stop leapoing to sillivile with every comment. Read with the purpose of trying to understand. :coffeepap


Please, my kids have better excuses.


j-mac
 
I think it is absolutely hilarious that you are taking me seriously right now.....Gheeze, lighten up will ya?

j-mac

I don't see the humor in it... Like I said, I never made the connection when I looked at the signature the first time, nor did it stand out to me as a strange or an odd signature. That's why I asked why you making a big deal about it. I am also not the one taking any offence here, so carry on.
 
Please, my kids have better excuses.


j-mac

I hope they read better. You have it completely wrong j, and this happens all too often. I can't constantly try and correct misreadings. Please, try not to leap of the ledge all the time.


:coffeepap
 
Hmmm....Another know it all that thinks that he can sum someone up within a post or two based on his own greatness in his own mind....pfft...Go away son you bother me.

j-mac

Was I wrong? If so, how? How are Truthers and Birthers apples and oranges?
 
Only a BRAIN DEAD MORON would doubt. I mean you have to be dirt stupid. Im no democrat but this is the DUMBEST thing Ive come across.
 
Was I wrong? If so, how? How are Truthers and Birthers apples and oranges?

IMHO, they are not apples and oranges. I think you raised a valid point.
 
Here is the released BC.

Obama's Birth Certificate - FoxNews.com

You tell me the name signed on the "local Registrar" line.

j-mac

It's not legible, but appears to be V-I-C-H-L-E-E. Your claim of "Ukulele" doesn't even come close to resembling what is there. Here's a tip mate, before you claim a word is there, make sure you known how to spell it first.

But really, a more important question is, why would the current registrar certify a certificate that not an accurate copy of the state's records?
 
IMHO, they are not apples and oranges. I think you raised a valid point.

Eh, it might be like comparing apples and oranges. But only inasmuch as both barrels are rotten.
 
Eh, it might be like comparing apples and oranges. But only inasmuch as both barrels are rotten.

If J mac thinks is apples to oranges, then he should at least explain why... The initial statement was meant for him... :lol:
 
Did they tell you why they couldn't accept your COLB, because they accept some... it just depends on the amount of info on the COLB

No. They said they would not accept it and that I needed the long form to continue. They said nothing else to me.
 
I call shenanigans.
 
I think he released it at the perfect time, because all of this overshadows it.

So it was 0bama playing the silly nonsense games. Got it.

Most of us want a President who is honest and doesn't play silly childish games. Most of us anyway.

For some that's all it takes to be "brilliant".
 
So it was 0bama playing the silly nonsense games. Got it.

Most of us want a President who is honest and doesn't play silly childish games. Most of us anyway.

For some that's all it takes to be "brilliant".

Childish games would be when people ask "Why didn't Obama release his BC until now" when it is firmly established that Obama released his BC in Aug 08, and that Obama only obtained a long form, via special request and armed with a team of lawyers, a week ago because issuing such long forms is not the normal practice of the state of Hawaii. Childish games are for people to rely on the birther BS to try to criticize Obama for anything whatsoever that gives reason to complain, even if illogically when there are already plenty of rational things on which to criticize the man, regarding his performance as President.
 
So it was 0bama playing the silly nonsense games. Got it.

Most of us want a President who is honest and doesn't play silly childish games. Most of us anyway.

For some that's all it takes to be "brilliant".

What are you even talking about?
 
Like the holocaust deniers, 9/11 truthers haven't a leg to stand on.

Bush was right to ignore them.

Yet Obama was wrong to ignore the birthers for so long?
 
Back
Top Bottom