• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Obama to speak on birth certificate

Last edited:
What's up witht he Registrars name? "U.K. Lalee"? Really?

j-mac

I take it you never been to Hawaii.

Not everybody is named Jones or Smith in the USA. Doesn't mean they are less American just that they may have a name of foregin descent.

A good reading is about the 442nd Regimental Combat Team in WWII without a single Jones of Smith in the unit.
 
I take it you never been to Hawaii.

Not everybody is named Jones or Smith in the USA. Doesn't mean they are less American just that they may have a name of foregin descent.

A good reading is about the 442nd Regimental Combat Team in WWII without a single Jones of Smith in the unit.

Yes, must have been a family of Hawian ditty singers....Named their daughter after a popular musical instrument.

j-mac
 
It would be nice if you right wing extremists would get your facts straight and knock off the lies.

It would be nice to see the left give credit for "Clinton's" balanced budget to the Rebublicans in Congress who forced it on him.

All you have to do is look at the Clinton budgets, the ones he bothered to submit anyway. None of them proposed a balanced budget.

If memory serves Clinton railed against the "Contract With America" that proposed a balanced budget.
 


"Right wing Extremists" eh? See, this is where you and the lib shill FactCheck gets it wrong. By relying on CBO, and organization that is well known for coming up with their conclusions based only on the numbers that the majority party at the time gives them...

Read and weep.

While not defending the increase of the federal debt under President Bush, it's curious to see Clinton's record promoted as having generated a surplus. It never happened. There was never a surplus and the facts support that position. In fact, far from a $360 billion reduction in the national debt in FY1998-FY2000, there was an increase of $281 billion.

Verifying this is as simple as accessing the U.S. Treasury (see note about this link below) website where the national debt is updated daily and a history of the debt since January 1993 can be obtained. Considering the government's fiscal year ends on the last day of September each year, and considering Clinton's budget proposal in 1993 took effect in October 1993 and concluded September 1994 (FY1994), here's the national debt at the end of each year of Clinton Budgets:



FY1993 09/30/1993 $4.411488 trillion
FY1994 09/30/1994 $4.692749 trillion $281.26 billion
FY1995 09/29/1995 $4.973982 trillion $281.23 billion
FY1996 09/30/1996 $5.224810 trillion $250.83 billion
FY1997 09/30/1997 $5.413146 trillion $188.34 billion
FY1998 09/30/1998 $5.526193 trillion $113.05 billion
FY1999 09/30/1999 $5.656270 trillion $130.08 billion
FY2000 09/29/2000 $5.674178 trillion $17.91 billion
FY2001 09/28/2001 $5.807463 trillion $133.29 billion


As can clearly be seen, in no year did the national debt go down, nor did Clinton leave President Bush with a surplus that Bush subsequently turned into a deficit. Yes, the deficit was almost eliminated in FY2000 (ending in September 2000 with a deficit of "only" $17.9 billion), but it never reached zero--let alone a positive surplus number. And Clinton's last budget proposal for FY2001, which ended in September 2001, generated a $133.29 billion deficit. The growing deficits started in the year of the last Clinton budget, not in the first year of the Bush administration.

The Myth of the Clinton Surplus
 
No welcome to the arrogant elitist that makes all people mad. Even England is mad that is why he did not get invited to the Royal Wedding

Hope you know there is more than one "elitist"........ Not just dems are "elitists"... Even conservatives are! I know this might be ashock to you...
 
Hope you know there is more than one "elitist"........ Not just dems are "elitists"... Even conservatives are! I know this might be ashock to you...

Ofcourse there are. But the people are fed up with this crap. They are on their way out.

j-mac
 
I'm going to have to give Obama props for releasing his official birth video... :thumbs:



:lamo
 
I'm going to have to give Obama props for releasing his official birth video... :thumbs:



:lamo


As the night wore on, it didn't look like Trump was all too happy about it...Kinda looked like the first 20 jokes were allright, but after that he was getting upset.

j-mac
 
As the night wore on, it didn't look like Trump was all too happy about it...Kinda looked like the first 20 jokes were allright, but after that he was getting upset.

j-mac

Yes, he was all upset, and no one to fire.
 
As the night wore on, it didn't look like Trump was all too happy about it...Kinda looked like the first 20 jokes were allright, but after that he was getting upset.

j-mac

Oh well, Trump will get over it.
 
As the night wore on, it didn't look like Trump was all too happy about it...Kinda looked like the first 20 jokes were allright, but after that he was getting upset.

j-mac

It turned into a roast, actually. This is probably the only occasion that Obama could legitimately target Trump so harshly. It was fantastic that still could still make the President seem overly harsh if one did not consider the context of his rebuttal.
 
Poor Donald has a bad temper and a poor sense of humor. As American said, he'll get over it.

It's time to move on. There is much about this President and administration to be concerned with and angry about. This is not one of them.
 
What's up witht he Registrars name? "U.K. Lalee"? Really?

j-mac

Why bother saying anything, if all you're going to say is stupid falsehoods like this?
 
It would be nice to see the left give credit for "Clinton's" balanced budget to the Rebublicans in Congress who forced it on him..

Actually, what would be nice is people would stop being partisan hacks like you're doing, and give credit to both sides. Clinton and the GOP congress battled every year over the budget and economic policy. They even shut the government down when they couldn't find enough common ground. But in the end, both sides were able to negotiate agreements and make compromises, and were able to figure out where and when to stick to things, and when and where to make concessions.
 
Actually, what would be nice is people would stop being partisan hacks like you're doing, and give credit to both sides. Clinton and the GOP congress battled every year over the budget and economic policy. They even shut the government down when they couldn't find enough common ground. But in the end, both sides were able to negotiate agreements and make compromises, and were able to figure out where and when to stick to things, and when and where to make concessions.

It's going to take both sides working together to find real world solutions to the massive problems currently facing this nation. The problem is, it doesn't look like they are capable of doing more than partisan sniping back and forth. Sometimes, the future of the US doesn't look very good.
 
Actually, what would be nice is people would stop being partisan hacks like you're doing, and give credit to both sides. Clinton and the GOP congress battled every year over the budget and economic policy.

They sure did battle over the budget. Republicans forced budget cuts on Clinton he didn't want and when they passed he took credit for it. There are people who still give Clinton credit for "balancing the budget" and welfare cuts when he was dragged kicking and screaming the whole way.


They even shut the government down when they couldn't find enough common ground.

They shut down the government? Who the hell are they? Clinton and dems had nothing to do with it.

Republicans refused to fund even more spending that Clinton wanted and were willing to shut it down.

But in the end, both sides were able to negotiate agreements and make compromises, and were able to figure out where and when to stick to things, and when and where to make concessions.

In the end Republicans forced spending cuts on Clinton. They were not his idea. He just took credit for them and still does today.

Partisan hack my a**. I lived through those times and was paying attention. I remember them well.

Where were you? Studying "Creative History"?
 
Who is invited to the royal wedding of Prince William and Kate Middleton? - International Business Times


Royal dignitaries include the king and queen of Norway, the grand duke of Luxembourg and a clutch of Middle Eastern princes, the queens of Denmark and Spain and crown princes. A number of religious leaders and representatives will also be present at the occasion apart from the bishop of London and the archbishop of Canterbury.


Read more: Who is invited to the royal wedding of Prince William and Kate Middleton? - International Business Times



Maybe if Obama would stop claiming France as our best ally or maybe when he got rid of Englands gift of a bust of Churchill this may have upset some in the royal family.

Obama has not been good at foreign policy

Mostly monarchs were invited... Honestly, that family has nothing to do with politics. They have no power in the parliament. I really don't see why Obama should have been invited anyway. It's more about traditional and celebrity news IMO
 
As the night wore on, it didn't look like Trump was all too happy about it...Kinda looked like the first 20 jokes were allright, but after that he was getting upset.

j-mac

Where is that video?

And I am not surprised that Trump would get pissed. He takes everything personally...
 
It turned into a roast, actually. This is probably the only occasion that Obama could legitimately target Trump so harshly. It was fantastic that still could still make the President seem overly harsh if one did not consider the context of his rebuttal.

Where are those videos? Seriously? I missed it.. :(

And Trump was already roasted... :lamo :lamo

I guess I'll do some searching on youtube.
 
Ptif,

I doubt any American president has been invited to a royal family wedding. Do you happen to know of any? .... and it's not surprising other monarchs would attend, because they often marry their kids off to each other.
:lamo:lamo
 
Ptif,

I doubt any American president has been invited to a royal family wedding. Do you happen to know of any?

Reagan.......
 
Reagan.......

Thanks for that fact. From reading further, it sounds like he was well acquainted and friendly with the royal family. He hosted their stay at the white house before... Michelle only met the Queen once from what I understand.
 
Back
Top Bottom