• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

House passes huge GOP budget cuts

I provided you a handy dandy wiki article that you simply refused to read. Not my problem.

I read your link. It didn’t answer my question just as you still refuse to. The obvious answer is that you have no clue


The problem is, you are the one who accused me of having my head up my ass and said I need to actually research how bad the economic conditions are instead of listening to pundits screaming on radio and television shows about how bad things are. You post a “pretty little graph” but can’t explain how the numbers were derived, yet you have the audacity to assume that I base my opinions upon screaming talk radio and tv talking heads?

The reality is that I look at real numbers, sort through the political hackery and try to come to intelligent conclusions on my own. You on the other hand have relied upon a progressive anti Reagan political hack site that doesn’t bother to explain how its statistical calculations are performed; it simply paints a partisan picture in the hopes that mindless individuals will accept the data as true without asking where the numbers come from.

As was already pointed out by another poster, S&P gave the US a negative outlook today. Perhaps you should spend a little less time listening to the extreme progressive “spend, spend and spend more” web sites and join the rest of us here in reality.
 
They just handed the Dems a political play book by putting these fringe-right Tea Party ideas down on the Congressional record -- the yeas just voted to pull the plug on grandma and a whole host of other things...

Go GOP!! Drink the Tea!

Pull the plug on Grandma? Care to point to anything in the Ryan budget that does anything close to this?
 
As was already pointed out by another poster, S&P gave the US a negative outlook today. Perhaps you should spend a little less time listening to the extreme progressive “spend, spend and spend more” web sites and join the rest of us here in reality.

And why did they give a negative rating? Because they are sure that Congress won't raise the debt ceiling. Exactly what I said only a few posts back. Your listening comprehension really, really sucks.
 
Platform | Libertarian Party

I will admit that I’m not an expert on political parties but the Libertarian Party platform doesn’t hold the same principles that some of you self proclaimed libertarians do. I don’t see how you can oppose private property rights and/or call for more government regulations and call yourself a libertarian.

I didn't mean that I identified myself with any specific party. Just that you could define my ideology along those lines. I actually consider myself a "practical anarchist", a term entirely of my own design. Which basically declares a condition of NO rule is optimal, but not practical.

Like pure democracy is impractical.

And how does a libertarian declare anyone un-libertarian.

Isn't that un-libertarian?
.
:2wave:
 
And why did they give a negative rating? Because they are sure that Congress won't raise the debt ceiling. Exactly what I said only a few posts back. Your listening comprehension really, really sucks.

If that is your reason for the S&P rating, your economic comprehension is worse than my listening comprehension. It must be nice to live in a bubble.

I'm done chatting with you on this as it really is pointless.
 
I didn't mean that I identified myself with any specific party. Just that you could define my ideology along those lines. I actually consider myself a "practical anarchist", a term entirely of my own design. Which basically declares a condition of NO rule is optimal, but not practical.

Like pure democracy is impractical.

And how does a libertarian declare anyone un-libertarian.

Isn't that un-libertarian?
.
:2wave:

I can respect that. I certainly don’t agree with your political position but you are at least capable of critical thought, unlike some around here.

BTW, I’m not a libertarian and not affiliated with any party so I think it’s ok when an unaffiliated declares someone unaffiliated.
 
Back
Top Bottom