- Joined
- Dec 9, 2009
- Messages
- 134,496
- Reaction score
- 14,621
- Location
- Houston, TX
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
No, you don't know what I'm talking about. First of all, I was talking about those no longer in the labor force, secondly, 921K is the total amount, not the monthly change. And it's the monthly change which affects the rate. Thirdly, I posted a link to the BLS.gov website to confirm the number I posted.
By the way, even the numbers you show of discouraged workers indicates there were almost 100,000 fewer in March than there were in February.
You don't even know what you are talking about, discouraged workers and not in the labor force are two different numbers. Notice the change between discouraged workers in February and March, that isn't 11,000, so keep spinning all in support of an empty suit in the WH. I can see why you need him.