- Joined
- Nov 6, 2009
- Messages
- 36,877
- Reaction score
- 22,202
- Location
- Didjabringabeeralong
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Communist
But thats exactly what the gay lobby is doing to the rest of the country.
The gay lobby is forcing people to be gay?
But thats exactly what the gay lobby is doing to the rest of the country.
But thats exactly what the gay lobby is doing to the rest of the country.
How does changing the meaning of one word to include other types of couples, without even excluding those couples that it already describes, change society? And even if it does, how is that change bad?
The gay lobby is forcing people to be gay?
How in the hell are LGBT people forcing you to be gay?
Want some cheese?
That's all you think is going to change? How we define a word?
That's all you think is going to change? How we define a word?
That's all you think is going to change? How we define a word?
Obviously the world is going to collapse into itself.
Just ask Canada.
I don't get that one.
No, people will actually be able to live their lives without the government limiting their pursuit of happiness.
Wine..........whine............whine-n-cheese.....come on, really?
Wine..........whine............whine-n-cheese.....come on, really?
Wine..........whine............whine-n-cheese.....come on, really?
The appropriate way to set up that insult is, "Do you want some cheese with that whine."
Anywho, what all is gonna change with same sex marriage? I'm sure the Canadians on the forum are eager to hear your predictions.
You think changing society doesn't do that?
That would have helped you follow?
That would have helped you follow?
You think your opinion on homosexuality is going to change when same-sex marriage becomes legal?
You dodged the question.
Oppression oppression oppression, that's what your position is all about.
The gay lobby is forcing people to be gay?
Okay, look, you cannot base a defense for a law on "I don't know what might happen but because I and others personally believe that this behavior is bad/wrong/sinful/distasteful/whatever negative word you care to use, it should remain that way because something bad might happen if we legalize it". This could easily be used as an excuse to legitimize almost any law. You have to have a legitimate reason to deny people equal protection. The behavior/action has to have some state interest to be denied equal protection.
Are you trying to be funny? Leave it to a liberal.
I didn't dodge it, I ignored it. I've given up giving a crap about CT's questions and statements.