• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Maryland Gay Marriage Bill sent back to cmte. Shelved for this year at least.

CaptainCourtesy said:
And you will end up in jail, for life. Sorry, your "room full of advocates discussing the 2nd Amendment with you" have no clue what they are talking about. I'd ask you to link to some actual evidence of this, but I have learned that when you are cornered and confronted with your posting of absurdity, you bitch and run.
Click to expand...

End up in Jail? Not if I do not want to...as I am an agent of free will. As I said and you demonstrated....Law cannot force anyone to do anything. If someone chooses to kill another...what's to stop him, writing on a piece of paper? Really? If Law could stop free will there would be NO CRIME. And who says that anyone has to end up in JAIL? What would stop someone from placing one behind your ear...and then one behind theirs...IF IS THEY SO CHOOSE? Not to mention the fact that almost 80% of all murders go unsolved. What idiocy. Law only works because of the MORAL CHARACTER of those who "choose" to live by those precepts. Really, do you believe that all the law enforcement people in the US could stop all the people from doing anything they want....If they choose not to live by those laws? A prime example....look at the middle east.

But back to YOU attempting to PROJECT your perverted sense of morality or rather the lack thereof upon other people, there are but a few BROKEBACK states and all those but ONE have made the perverted practice supposedly LEGAL by legislating law form the bench void of any representation from society. The only state that has passed such a law through and act of legislation done as much by cherry picking one of the smallest populated states in the UNION with the queer eye for the straight guy LOBBY purchasing the representatives. Why did they choose this state to purchase? Its simple, not only is it one the smallest in population....THE PEOPLE thereof do not have the right to VOTE by the use of a Referendum or RECALL. Then the PLAN is transparent...they attack the DOMA law and attempt to FORCE the peoples of all other states to accept one small states voice.....less than .5% of the total US POPULATION, to incorporate a supposed LAW upon the entire NATION. Its the progressive way...if you cannot win on the battle field of ideas...you attempt to circumvent the voice of the people through the Courts. Transparent as Glass.
 
Last edited:
Walter said:
End up in Jail? Not if I do not want to...as I am an agent of free will. As I said and you demonstrated....Law cannot force anyone to do anything. If someone chooses to kill another...what's to stop him, writing on a piece of paper? Really? If Law could stop free will there would be NO CRIME. And who says that anyone has to end up in JAIL? What wrong with placing one behind your ear...and then one behind Mine...IF IS SO CHOOSE? What idiocy.
Click to expand...

:inandout:
 
Walter said:
End up in Jail? Not if I do not want to...as I am an agent of free will. As I said and you demonstrated....Law cannot force anyone to do anything. If someone chooses to kill another...what's to stop him, writing on a piece of paper? Really? If Law could stop free will there would be NO CRIME. And who says that anyone has to end up in JAIL? What wrong with placing one behind your ear...and then one behind Mine...IF IS SO CHOOSE? What idiocy.
Click to expand...

Good to know that you are in favor of things like murder. Also good to know that you would then take the coward's way out and kill yourself rather than taking responsibility for your behavior.

Oh... and though there is nothing to stop behaviors, there are consequences for behaviors. I would think you might understand that concept.

What idiocy.
 
Last edited:
This thread = proof that drugs are bad.

Moderator's Warning:
For being off topic, I am threadbanning myself from this thread.
 
Redress said:
This thread = proof that drugs are bad.

Moderator's Warning:
For being off topic, I am threadbanning myself from this thread.
Click to expand...

I know what you are doing. Very cheap.

Moderator's Warning:
For commenting on moderation, I am warning myself for a 6A violation.
 
CaptainCourtesy said:
Good to know that you are in favor of things like murder. Also good to know that you would then take the coward's way out and kill yourself rather than taking responsibility for your behavior.

Oh... and though there is nothing to stop behaviors, there are consequences for behaviors. I would think you might understand that concept.

What idiocy.
Click to expand...

Just facing the FACTS. Anyone, anywhere can be killed and no law can stop FREE WILL. According to YOU PROGRESSIVES there are no absolute wrongs or rights as MORALITY is a personal choice. If such is true...by what authority to you even attempt to lecture anyone about MORALITY...if morality is unique to each individual. But..who can expect LOGIC from anyone that attempts to define NORMAL as placing round pegs into square holes? Laugh My Ass Off. The only reason that MURDER is considered to be IMMORAL and ILLEGAL stems from the FACT that US JURISPRUDENCE referenced Blackstones theory concerning law...and Blackstone directly referenced the Holy Scriptures.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commentaries_on_the_Laws_of_England
 
Last edited:
Walter said:
by what authority to you even attempt to lecture anyone about MORALITY
Click to expand...

By what AUTHORITY do you have to lecture ANYONE about MORALITY, how come YOU got it RIGHT and WE got it WRONG!?

And WHY must you INCESSANTLY CAPITALIZE EVERY FRICKING 3RD WORD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
Last edited:
Walter said:
Just facing the FACTS. Anyone, anywhere can be killed and no law can stop FREE WILL. According to YOU PROGRESSIVES there are no absolute wrongs or rights as MORALITY is a personal choice. If such is true...by what authority to you even attempt to lecture anyone about MORALITY...if morality is unique to each individual. But..who can expect LOGIC from anyone that attempts to define NORMAL as placing round pegs into square holes? Laugh My Ass Off.
Click to expand...

You do realize that 1: buttholes are round...not square. 2: Women that are homosexual don't have a "round peg" to put into any type of hole...much less a square one. 3: you have yet to back up ANY of your assertions in this thread.
 
Walter said:
Just facing the FACTS. Anyone, anywhere can be killed and no law can stop FREE WILL. According to YOU PROGRESSIVES there are no absolute wrongs or rights as MORALITY is a personal choice. If such is true...by what authority to you even attempt to lecture anyone about MORALITY...if morality is unique to each individual. But..who can expect LOGIC from anyone that attempts to define NORMAL as placing round pegs into square holes? Laugh My Ass Off.
Click to expand...

Of course your comments had ZERO correlation to what I posted. Your comments never do since you have no logical responses to being confronted on you absurd postings. For example, please show where I said anything about morality... I'll give you a hint... I didn't. And, of course, you will refuse to define the term "normal" because you know if you did, it would give anyone with the ability to post an opening to show just how little logic you have. All you are doing is soapboxing, with absolutely nothing of substance to back you up... as usual. Makes your posts look pretty ridiculous.
 
Kal'Stang said:
You do realize that 1: buttholes are round...not square. 2: Women that are homosexual don't have a "round peg" to put into any type of hole...much less a square one. 3: you have yet to back up ANY of your assertions in this thread.
Click to expand...

He's not going to... simply because he can't.
 
Kal'Stang said:
You do realize that 1: buttholes are round...not square. 2: Women that are homosexual don't have a "round peg" to put into any type of hole...much less a square one. 3: you have yet to back up ANY of your assertions in this thread.
Click to expand...

Round pegs are not that expensive to buy, and you can get them online so no more embarrassing trips to the sleazy place where you don't want to touch any of the surfaces.
 
CaptainCourtesy said:
Of course your comments had ZERO correlation to what I posted. Your comments never do since you have no logical responses to being confronted on you absurd postings. For example, please show where I said anything about morality... I'll give you a hint... I didn't. And, of course, you will refuse to define the term "normal" because you know if you did, it would give anyone with the ability to post an opening to show just how little logic you have. All you are doing is soapboxing, with absolutely nothing of substance to back you up... as usual. Makes your posts look pretty ridiculous.
Click to expand...

Since WHEN do you get to DIRECT MY RETORTS? I freely chose to point out your ABSURD logical fallacies by demonstrating that Law is but a reflection of societies Moral Compass. A legend in YOUR OWN MIND? Now you self profess to have the ability to direct a debate....and if you cannot, its ILLOGICAL? Really? Again, Laugh My proverbial ass off. Nope, not at all....progressives are not pompous condescending trolls whatsoever.
 
Last edited:
Walter said:
Since WHEN do you get to DIRECT MY RETORTS? I freely chose to point out your ABSURD logical fallacies by demonstrating that Law is but a reflection of societies Moral Compass.
Click to expand...

Does anyone besides me see the irony in this...
 
StillBallin75 said:
Does anyone besides me see the irony in this...
Click to expand...

Again? Another Self Professed Genius? Yet no one is capable of explaining how LAW stops anyone from engaging their God granted gift of FREE WILL. Funny as Hell.
 
Moderator's Warning:
Play nice guys. Don't make me pull this thread over.
 
Walter said:
Since WHEN do you get to DIRECT MY RETORTS? I freely chose to point out your ABSURD logical fallacies by demonstrating that Law is but a reflection of societies Moral Compass. A legend in YOUR OWN MIND? Now you self profess to have the ability to direct a debate....and if you cannot, its ILLOGICAL? Really? Again, Laugh My proverbial ass off. Nope, not at all....progressives are not pompous condescending trolls whatsoever.
Click to expand...

If you cannot respond to what I say, I'll point out your ABSURDITY anytime I want. I will also point out your lack of logic and your inability to demonstrate any evidence for your positions, or any ability to debate whatsoever. That's called FREE WILL, as you have pointed out. And as I have pointed out, there are consequences for your behavior. Me pointing out that you have no ability to debate logically is the consequence of your behavior. Don't like it? Change your behavior. Don't want to? I'll keep poining it out.
 
Walter said:
Just facing the FACTS. Anyone, anywhere can be killed and no law can stop FREE WILL. According to YOU PROGRESSIVES there are no absolute wrongs or rights as MORALITY is a personal choice. If such is true...by what authority to you even attempt to lecture anyone about MORALITY...if morality is unique to each individual. But..who can expect LOGIC from anyone that attempts to define NORMAL as placing round pegs into square holes? Laugh My Ass Off.
Click to expand...

Except for a couple of facts. First of all, you can kill whoever you choose to if you actually are capable of doing it, but that doesn't mean that you can guarantee that you will not face some form of punishment, either from society or from the family/friends of the deceased. On top of that, I highly doubt that God would be very happy with you killing a person just because they were a man who wanted to marry another man or a woman who wanted to marry another woman. Last time I looked, that was definitely not what Jesus would do.

Secondly, I believe that most people have certain agreements on certain right and wrong things. This generally leads to what becomes laws for a society.

The thing about these arguments is that some of us base laws off of the morality that is set down in the US Constitution, which states that every person should have the right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. By this phrase is how I base my interpretation of what laws should impose upon the population. It requires a very simple test. Do the actions of a person or group affect someone else's right to life, liberty, or the pursuit of happiness in a tangible way? Essentially, does the action cause harm to another person or their property without due cause? Does the action keep someone captive in some way without due process? These things should be what causes laws to be made. Now sometimes one person's liberties have to be weighed against another person's liberties to determine which one is most important. That is what we have courts for.
 
Walter said:
Your idea of OBJECTIVE DEBATE? Not surprising in the least...Round Peg, Square Hole.
Click to expand...

You seem to have a really unhealthy obsession with square holes...

roguenuke said:
Except for a couple of facts. First of all, you can kill whoever you choose to if you actually are capable of doing it, but that doesn't mean that you can guarantee that you will not face some form of punishment, either from society or from the family/friends of the deceased. On top of that, I highly doubt that God would be very happy with you killing a person just because they were a man who wanted to marry another man or a woman who wanted to marry another woman. Last time I looked, that was definitely not what Jesus would do.

Secondly, I believe that most people have certain agreements on certain right and wrong things. This generally leads to what becomes laws for a society.

The thing about these arguments is that some of us base laws off of the morality that is set down in the US Constitution, which states that every person should have the right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. By this phrase is how I base my interpretation of what laws should impose upon the population. It requires a very simple test. Do the actions of a person or group affect someone else's right to life, liberty, or the pursuit of happiness in a tangible way? Essentially, does the action cause harm to another person or their property without due cause? Does the action keep someone captive in some way without due process? These things should be what causes laws to be made. Now sometimes one person's liberties have to be weighed against another person's liberties to determine which one is most important. That is what we have courts for.
Click to expand...

You're honestly trying to reason with this person Rogue?

Great post by the way, too bad you wasted it on on someone who will never aknowledge it :(
 
Last edited:
CaptainCourtesy said:
If you cannot respond to what I say, I'll point out your ABSURDITY anytime I want. I will also point out your lack of logic and your inability to demonstrate any evidence for your positions, or any ability to debate whatsoever. That's called FREE WILL, as you have pointed out. And as I have pointed out, there are consequences for your behavior. Me pointing out that you have no ability to debate logically is the consequence of your behavior. Don't like it? Change your behavior. Don't want to? I'll keep poining it out.
Click to expand...

Of course, You can point out (JUDGE) anything....but no one is allowed to JUDGE YOU. I see quite clearly, said the blind man. Again, Laugh My Ass Off.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom