- Joined
- Sep 19, 2008
- Messages
- 53,409
- Reaction score
- 31,478
- Location
- Northern California
- Gender
- Female
- Political Leaning
- Independent
And you will end up in jail, for life. Sorry, your "room full of advocates discussing the 2nd Amendment with you" have no clue what they are talking about. I'd ask you to link to some actual evidence of this, but I have learned that when you are cornered and confronted with your posting of absurdity, you bitch and run.
End up in Jail? Not if I do not want to...as I am an agent of free will. As I said and you demonstrated....Law cannot force anyone to do anything. If someone chooses to kill another...what's to stop him, writing on a piece of paper? Really? If Law could stop free will there would be NO CRIME. And who says that anyone has to end up in JAIL? What wrong with placing one behind your ear...and then one behind Mine...IF IS SO CHOOSE? What idiocy.
End up in Jail? Not if I do not want to...as I am an agent of free will. As I said and you demonstrated....Law cannot force anyone to do anything. If someone chooses to kill another...what's to stop him, writing on a piece of paper? Really? If Law could stop free will there would be NO CRIME. And who says that anyone has to end up in JAIL? What wrong with placing one behind your ear...and then one behind Mine...IF IS SO CHOOSE? What idiocy.
Moderator's Warning: |
For being off topic, I am threadbanning myself from this thread. |
This thread = proof that drugs are bad.
Moderator's Warning: For being off topic, I am threadbanning myself from this thread.
Moderator's Warning: |
For commenting on moderation, I am warning myself for a 6A violation. |
Good to know that you are in favor of things like murder. Also good to know that you would then take the coward's way out and kill yourself rather than taking responsibility for your behavior.
Oh... and though there is nothing to stop behaviors, there are consequences for behaviors. I would think you might understand that concept.
What idiocy.
by what authority to you even attempt to lecture anyone about MORALITY
Just facing the FACTS. Anyone, anywhere can be killed and no law can stop FREE WILL. According to YOU PROGRESSIVES there are no absolute wrongs or rights as MORALITY is a personal choice. If such is true...by what authority to you even attempt to lecture anyone about MORALITY...if morality is unique to each individual. But..who can expect LOGIC from anyone that attempts to define NORMAL as placing round pegs into square holes? Laugh My Ass Off.
By what AUTHORITY do you have to lecture ANYONE about MORALITY, how come YOU got it RIGHT and WE got it WRONG!?
Just facing the FACTS. Anyone, anywhere can be killed and no law can stop FREE WILL. According to YOU PROGRESSIVES there are no absolute wrongs or rights as MORALITY is a personal choice. If such is true...by what authority to you even attempt to lecture anyone about MORALITY...if morality is unique to each individual. But..who can expect LOGIC from anyone that attempts to define NORMAL as placing round pegs into square holes? Laugh My Ass Off.
You do realize that 1: buttholes are round...not square. 2: Women that are homosexual don't have a "round peg" to put into any type of hole...much less a square one. 3: you have yet to back up ANY of your assertions in this thread.
You do realize that 1: buttholes are round...not square. 2: Women that are homosexual don't have a "round peg" to put into any type of hole...much less a square one. 3: you have yet to back up ANY of your assertions in this thread.
I'll bet ya he starts using the Bible as his evidence and starts talking for God.
Of course your comments had ZERO correlation to what I posted. Your comments never do since you have no logical responses to being confronted on you absurd postings. For example, please show where I said anything about morality... I'll give you a hint... I didn't. And, of course, you will refuse to define the term "normal" because you know if you did, it would give anyone with the ability to post an opening to show just how little logic you have. All you are doing is soapboxing, with absolutely nothing of substance to back you up... as usual. Makes your posts look pretty ridiculous.
Since WHEN do you get to DIRECT MY RETORTS? I freely chose to point out your ABSURD logical fallacies by demonstrating that Law is but a reflection of societies Moral Compass.
Does anyone besides me see the irony in this...
Again? Another Self Professed Genius?
Moderator's Warning: |
Play nice guys. Don't make me pull this thread over. |
Since WHEN do you get to DIRECT MY RETORTS? I freely chose to point out your ABSURD logical fallacies by demonstrating that Law is but a reflection of societies Moral Compass. A legend in YOUR OWN MIND? Now you self profess to have the ability to direct a debate....and if you cannot, its ILLOGICAL? Really? Again, Laugh My proverbial ass off. Nope, not at all....progressives are not pompous condescending trolls whatsoever.
Better then a self professed moron...
Just facing the FACTS. Anyone, anywhere can be killed and no law can stop FREE WILL. According to YOU PROGRESSIVES there are no absolute wrongs or rights as MORALITY is a personal choice. If such is true...by what authority to you even attempt to lecture anyone about MORALITY...if morality is unique to each individual. But..who can expect LOGIC from anyone that attempts to define NORMAL as placing round pegs into square holes? Laugh My Ass Off.
Your idea of OBJECTIVE DEBATE? Not surprising in the least...Round Peg, Square Hole.
Except for a couple of facts. First of all, you can kill whoever you choose to if you actually are capable of doing it, but that doesn't mean that you can guarantee that you will not face some form of punishment, either from society or from the family/friends of the deceased. On top of that, I highly doubt that God would be very happy with you killing a person just because they were a man who wanted to marry another man or a woman who wanted to marry another woman. Last time I looked, that was definitely not what Jesus would do.
Secondly, I believe that most people have certain agreements on certain right and wrong things. This generally leads to what becomes laws for a society.
The thing about these arguments is that some of us base laws off of the morality that is set down in the US Constitution, which states that every person should have the right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. By this phrase is how I base my interpretation of what laws should impose upon the population. It requires a very simple test. Do the actions of a person or group affect someone else's right to life, liberty, or the pursuit of happiness in a tangible way? Essentially, does the action cause harm to another person or their property without due cause? Does the action keep someone captive in some way without due process? These things should be what causes laws to be made. Now sometimes one person's liberties have to be weighed against another person's liberties to determine which one is most important. That is what we have courts for.
If you cannot respond to what I say, I'll point out your ABSURDITY anytime I want. I will also point out your lack of logic and your inability to demonstrate any evidence for your positions, or any ability to debate whatsoever. That's called FREE WILL, as you have pointed out. And as I have pointed out, there are consequences for your behavior. Me pointing out that you have no ability to debate logically is the consequence of your behavior. Don't like it? Change your behavior. Don't want to? I'll keep poining it out.