no.clearly, you are unable to rebut the points i made
i distinguished between a hearing about the KKK's terrorism and a hearing about moslems who have done nothing wrong. you failed to apprehend the distinction. no surprise [/sarcasm]
please. let's do
any observer who watched the hearings knows what they were actually about, no matter how much that IRA terrorist supporting congressman pretends otherwise. it was a public demonization of a religion. as with many reich wing matters, one must examine the real actions instead of the misleading descriptive words. the words are only there to deceive the gullible who choose not to examine the actions
i understand your opposition to my comparison, where it is noteworthy that white Christians - those not affiliated with white supremacists - were not similarly summoned to appear before the congress to explain why members of their Christian religion engage in racial terrorism
that direct comparison undermines your argument. continue to whine about it as that tells me you are pissed off at losing the debate
the congress should be investigating terrorism
but it instead diverts its time and resources to pursue a divisive, partisan, destructive attack on innocent members of the islamic faith
congress has no reason to summon before it innocent practitioners of the islamic religion to have them explain why they tolerate those who practice the same faith. that is like asking you why you tolerate the pedophiles who practice your religious beliefs, despite your not having any knowledge of those perverts or their actions
sadly, osama bin forgotten is the George Washington of the disenfranchised moslem world. when, by our nation's actions, we give credibility to his pronouncements against us, his fatwas, we assist his ability to recruit more prospective terrorists. if this were only theatre
