• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Fox News firebrand Glenn Beck facing axe

I'm still waiting for the evidence to support the OP. At about post 500, I asked for it.... crickets.

No, first things first, I want Beck fired. NOW!!!
 
An accomplishment requiring little effort.

Your statement clearly shows that you consider "losing me" to be an "accomplishment", which is something one sets out to do. And that it required "little effort". So it was easy to do what you set out to do, which, according to your statement was to "lose me".

Semantics, not antics.

And since this is the case I have no choice but to label you collaborator.

Working with the very communists you pretend to fear.

Ranting about the issue in such an incoherent manner that no one will actually take the threat seriously. That way, your pinko leaders will meet no opposition.

Because you made everyone think the topic silly.

Silly
 
So did he get fired yet or what? I was expecting something to happen relatively quick given the OP.
 
OK so you want me to get into this Alice in Wonderland dreamworld?

No, I'd like you to lay out a rational, and honest argument, neither of which are in your well proven past.

In London there is a little man with a billboard saying "the End of the World is Nigh". He's a nutter. People don't tend to enter debate with him. But if you insist that the sheer number of gullible fools who give Beck's tedious drivel the time of day is a reason to take him seriously, then let's try shall we?

Wonderful, you start out predictably as any good mouth foaming lib, with a direct slam against the person. Straight out of 'Rules for Radicals'.... Bravo.

Tell me. When is the end of the world coming?

Me? Why would I know that? Have I ever said that I have that vision? Better yet, even though you try to make this about me, Beck has never said that he knows either.

Who is the anti-Christ (which particular muslim today is the Whore of Babylon?)

Well, there were some pretty entertaining shows that delved into the 12th Imam and how that coincided with Biblical scripture, however, I don't think he specifically named anyone, other than the mythical Mhadi himself.

Where exactly do reform Rabbis fit into the Revelation of St John?

Not versed enough to give an answer to that, are you saying that Beck did?

Let's here some more about Jews who are complicit with the Holocaust.

Such as whom? Soros? he was. That is documented.

Tell us about God's special plan from America and why he entrusted its foundation to a bunch of anti-Christians and atheists who despised the type of dagmatic nonsense that Beck and other nutters support.

I don't know where exactly you learned about the founding fathers, but it sure sounds twisted.

Why are we foreigners untermenschen?

Explain further please.

You can continue to fete this anti-semitic scumbag if you wish. Don't expect anyone with any sense to take this piece of crap seriously, or anyone who seriously supports him.

Who is anti Semitic? If any ideology fits that moniker today, it is liberals.

j-mac
 
Your statement clearly shows that you consider "losing me" to be an "accomplishment", which is something one sets out to do. And that it required "little effort". So it was easy to do what you set out to do, which, according to your statement was to "lose me".
I see. When you have no response, no defense...do the old linguistic twist. I hate being redundant, but how very infantile. A correction for your edification. An accomplishment requiring little effort on my part means just that. The accomplishment, in this case, was yours for being unable to discern the meaning of my comment. Likely you are not stupid, but unashamedly evasive and having no adequate response in return and having realized just that very fact you did your linguistic two-step, side-step semantical terpsichorean best effort.


Semantics, not antics.
You are, of course, addressing this to yourself you know!


And since this is the case I have no choice but to label you collaborator.
Working with the very communists you pretend to fear.
WOW!
You are in need of help. While we have just reformed out entire healthcare system as per your Hope and Change Great Leader to what you have desired and "pre-existing conditions" shall be covered, I strongly suggest you get in line. Making leaps of illogic like you do here strains credulity. I see a full-frontal lobotomy in your future.




Ranting about the issue in such an incoherent manner that no one will actually take the threat seriously. That way, your pinko leaders will meet no opposition.

Because you made everyone think the topic silly.

Silly
Thanks for validating that my humble opinion just offered is NOT premature and right-on! This excursion into left-field la-la-land is amazing.



Please to TRY to get back on-topic with some degeree of coherence and rational thought. Thanks in advance.
 
No, I'd like you to lay out a rational, and honest argument, neither of which are in your well proven past.



Wonderful, you start out predictably as any good mouth foaming lib, with a direct slam against the person. Straight out of 'Rules for Radicals'.... Bravo.



Me? Why would I know that? Have I ever said that I have that vision? Better yet, even though you try to make this about me, Beck has never said that he knows either.



Well, there were some pretty entertaining shows that delved into the 12th Imam and how that coincided with Biblical scripture, however, I don't think he specifically named anyone, other than the mythical Mhadi himself.



Not versed enough to give an answer to that, are you saying that Beck did?



Such as whom? Soros? he was. That is documented.



I don't know where exactly you learned about the founding fathers, but it sure sounds twisted.



Explain further please.



Who is anti Semitic? If any ideology fits that moniker today, it is liberals.

j-mac

Quod erat demonstrandum. Joining in the anti semitic Jew hating fest to blame Jews for the Holocaust. Obscene, disgusting and unworthy of any respect whatsoever. It has long been a defence of Nazis and Holocaust deniers to allege that Jews who acted in duress to show limited cooperation with Nazis, were collaborators. It is a vile and anti semitic piece of filth. If you want to look for collaboration look for the wholesale cooperation of communists and conservatives with appeasing Hitler, in Europe and America, as the centre and centre left formed the only political constituency to oppose him. The complicity of the American Right in appeasing these scum, as it wallowed in its vicious anti-semitism, was far more a collaboration than anything Jews did under duress.

"Liberals" is an ideology? Can we have something coherent posted here please. Just drivel. Utter drivel from you here again.

And I didn't start off against the person at all. Can you actually follow an argument buddy? I attacked "end of days" nonsense, a phenomenon where hucksters, confidence tricksters and fools have woven lies and superstitious deceit since the founding of Christendom. A phenomenon whcih Beck contributes to. It is the utter stupidity of his crackpot and of days paranoia that I clearly attacked. Try and keep up.

But I am also hapopy to slam someone as manifestly evil, deceitful, dishonest and avaricious as Beck.

Jews and anti-semitism is just a game for the Right. Especially these religious nutter Christian Talibani. We know they need Israel for their prophesy fulfullment but we also know that they still hate the Jews as the killers of Christ. Underneath it is clear that the anti-semitic language they use ("blood-libel"), the people they support (like Elizabeth Dilling, Beck's Nazi symapthizing idol), the Holocaust denial of the "American First" scum like Pat Buchanan - it's all there below the surface. People like Beck are supersitious, irrational, fairy story spinning snake oil salesmen. More fool the arseholes who buy their wares.

Now as you are defending Beck here, perhaps you could lay out why we should take his views on the end of days, the Whore of Babylon, the Antichrist et cetera, seriously. Let's all have a good laugh eh?

Or does this stuff embarass you?
 
Last edited:
I see. When you have no response, no defense...do the old linguistic twist. I hate being redundant, but how very infantile. A correction for your edification. An accomplishment requiring little effort on my part means just that. The accomplishment, in this case, was yours for being unable to discern the meaning of my comment. Likely you are not stupid, but unashamedly evasive and having no adequate response in return and having realized just that very fact you did your linguistic two-step, side-step semantical terpsichorean best effort.


You are, of course, addressing this to yourself you know!


WOW!
You are in need of help. While we have just reformed out entire healthcare system as per your Hope and Change Great Leader to what you have desired and "pre-existing conditions" shall be covered, I strongly suggest you get in line. Making leaps of illogic like you do here strains credulity. I see a full-frontal lobotomy in your future.




Thanks for validating that my humble opinion just offered is NOT premature and right-on! This excursion into left-field la-la-land is amazing.



Please to TRY to get back on-topic with some degeree of coherence and rational thought. Thanks in advance.

First, you don't get to post long diatribes about communism in every thread as proof of how stupid liberals are and b**** at people for being off topic. Ever.

Second: for all those who rant on about the monstrous communist threat at the same time as constantly referrng to liberals as lazy commies who always want something for free, two questions:

Who's gonna take it for them (outta all these lazy commies)?

And if these communist "leaders" aren't gonna get anything extra, why would they go to all the effort in the first place?

Isn't Ambitious Communist an oxymoron?

And its not my job to understand you. Its your job to present your information in a manner that a reasonable person not only can understand, but does.

And for the record, you did call JB winkin. I stand corrected. Didn't scroll down far enough. Just saw two kanes.

Sense of humor would be nice. And a little less absolute certainty.

You write well though, I enjoy your vocabulary.:2wave:

And Glen Beck is still a jack***!
 
Last edited:
First, you don't get to post long diatribes about communism in every thread as proof of how stupid liberals are and b**** at people for being off topic. Ever.
Ohhhhh! Mighty oracle of the west. Excuuuuuuuuuuuse me., but it was you who have made a concerted effort at introducing communism here as your distractive whipping boy.



Second: for all those who rant on about the monstrous communist threat at the same time as constantly referrng to liberals as lazy commies who always want something for free, two questions:
Where did I say "...lazy commies who always want something for free"? If you want a definition of liberals in America I can give you one. Sanctimonious and hypocritical, 'holier than thou', arrogant, useless bastards who have no respect for the lessons of history or the right of dissenting opinion. Hmmm! Yep. Works for me.



Who's gonna take it for them (outta all these lazy commies)?

And if these communist "leaders" aren't gonna get anything extra, why would they go to all the effort in the first place?
??? Irrelevant.



Isn't Ambitious Communist an oxymoron?
Please to show me the context wherein I used mabiyious communist as a reference.



And its not my job to understand you. Its your job to present your information in a manner that a reasonable person not only can understand, but does.

And for the record, you did call JB winkin. I stand corrected. Didn't scroll down far enough. Just saw two kanes.
Interesting how you libs contradict yourself with no help from anyone else. First you lambast me for not being coherent enough in meaning and then you follow-up with an apology (noted and respected) for an error in perception, an oversight, on your part. I do not speak in tongues nor write in sanskrit. I enjoy using metaphorical references to make points. Sometimes sarcastically, sometimes not. It is not being didactic or pedantic at all, merely a style of posting opinion. If that is offensive or confusing to you why not pass on by and go to the next post? For minor annoyances there are always alternatives.



Sense of humor would be nice. And a little less absolute certainty.
Great! Glad you enjoy my definition of an American liberal.



You write well though, I enjoy your vocabulary.:2wave:
Good. I appreciate that. As my mentor Willie the Speare once offered..."All's well that ends well."



And Glen Beck is still a jack***!
A perception worth considering dependent upon how one defines a "jackoff". You see..., I'm a reasonable fellow. I've stated here on other threads that I respect Mr. Beck for that which he has accomplished in his life, but I do not like his style of presentation. Much of his content though is very accurate. He does tend to do what those who mix too heavy a dose of emotion into intellectual opinion do. He rants and takes latitudes with the truth at times. As an example I once took note of him linking the beginnigs of liberal progressivism to Teddy Roosevelt. I'd debate him on his confusion there.
I also believe that he's a good and decent person doing what he perceives is the right thing. Has his personal belief in God played a heavy-hand in his still developing persona? Of course. If you've ever known anyone who has been at the bottom of the barrel in life and lifted themselves by their own bootstraps above and beyond the average you'd make some accomodation for the vicissitudes of a deeply emotional personal epiphany. That's my view on Mr. Glen Beck.
 
I will accept your gracious acknowledgement of your own wrongness on this thread at any point now, Beck worshippers.

Gawker — Today's gossip is tomorrow's news

And no, Zimmer, Barb, cpwill, whovian, Councilman, Conservative, etc., I am not so classy that I'm unwilling to gloat about the fact that you were completely wrong, and the article I posted was, in fact, correct. ;)
 
Last edited:
I will accept your gracious acknowledgement of your own wrongness on this thread at any point now, Beck worshippers.

Gawker — Today's gossip is tomorrow's news

And no, Zimmer, Barb, cpwill, whovian, Councilman, Conservative, etc., I am not so classy that I'm unwilling to gloat about the fact that you were completely wrong, and the article I posted was, in fact, correct. ;)

Now you did it, Catz, I watched that video and wasn't wearing my boots.:-(
 
Now you did it, Catz, I watched that video and wasn't wearing my boots.:-(

Completely wrong about what? I do hope that along with penis enlargement ads that balls will come with those and that will assure liberal viewship since it seems that liberals have neither.
 
Hhmm...i wonder what beck will do now .Also a big bump so we can look at the eggs on the face of a few of our winger contingent.




:thumbs:
 
Hhmm...i wonder what beck will do now .Also a big bump so we can look at the eggs on the face of a few of our winger contingent.




:thumbs:
Roger Ailes is a businessman and only the bottom line matters and Beck was starting to bleed red ink. Though much of what he said was true, his presentation was annoying as Hell to me and the reason I originally stated that I never watched him regularly. His presentation defined "maudlin" and I think wore out many of his regular viewers. I'm conservative and I think that for comparison to what he was at his peak he's heading for the toilet. You cannot be continually repetitious with the same message harping on the same thing and not expect to get the big yawn as a result. Who knows...maybe The Blaze will lead to Glenn Beck Ministries after a short stint back wearing out the faithful on AM radio. And to think that the guy never realized that O'Reilly, his pal, was just using him as a foil. Oh well...se la vie!
 
Hhmm...i wonder what beck will do now .Also a big bump so we can look at the eggs on the face of a few of our winger contingent.




:thumbs:
Now that I made my honest, forthright observation as a conservative, I'll make a separate observation.

As of Beck's canning he still has a wider audience that any of the leftards like Mr. Ed, Rachel Madcow, et al. You see Donc, it has to be that conservatives have much higher standards than liberals. The audience for the top leftard on radio/TV would spell THE END if he/she were a conservative. So I wouldn't get too slap-happy and giddy over Beck.
 
Now that I made my honest, forthright observation as a conservative, I'll make a separate observation.

As of Beck's canning he still has a wider audience that any of the leftards like Mr. Ed, Rachel Madcow, et al. You see Donc, it has to be that conservatives have much higher standards than liberals. The audience for the top leftard on radio/TV would spell THE END if he/she were a conservative. So I wouldn't get too slap-happy and giddy over Beck.

I just got a call on my hot line to the White House that the first thing on the agenda after the swearing in ceremony of President Obama,s second term is implementing the. Dreaded…FAIRNESS DOCTRINE.:shock:

Sshh don’t tell anyone, wouldn’t want to panic any wingers.:mrgreen:
 
I just got a call on my hot line to the White House that the first thing on the agenda after the swearing in ceremony of President Obama,s second term is implementing the. Dreaded…FAIRNESS DOCTRINE.:shock:

Sshh don’t tell anyone, wouldn’t want to panic any wingers.:mrgreen:
Making your usual illogical sense. Laughter in the face of a real threat to all our freedoms, not just to right-wing Americans, but all Americans because you just don't get it. Have fun.
 
Back
Top Bottom