• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Eighteen involved in gang rape of 11 year old girl in Texas

Just saw this article giving more details on the case:

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/29/us/29texas.html?pagewanted=1&_r=2

Notably I see not mention of the 14 year-old from earlier articles and one of the individuals charged was apparently only present according to the information. This also confirms it was not all a single incident but several incidents over three months. Oddly there is one individual charged with rape who appears to only be charged as acting alone in separate incidents.
 
Demon of Light said:
Just saw this article giving more details on the case:

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/29/us/29texas.html?pagewanted=1&_r=2

Notably I see not mention of the 14 year-old from earlier articles and one of the individuals charged was apparently only present according to the information. This also confirms it was not all a single incident but several incidents over three months. Oddly there is one individual charged with rape who appears to only be charged as acting alone in separate incidents.
Click to expand...

Four of the defendants are charged with continuous sexual abuse of a young child. The rest are charged with a single count of aggravated sexual assault of a child under 14. Both felonies carry a sentence of 25 years to life in prison.
Click to expand...

I hope they throw the book at them. What a bunch of sorry excuses for human beings.
 
X Factor said:
Let's talk credibility here, shall we. It's come up a couple times since credibility of the victim, the offender and whoever else is important. You say that you have not engaged in personal attacks. I say that is an inaccurate claim. I'm basically accusing you of being untruthful or, at least, mistaken. If this were a court of law, then, I would need to prove it, right? Well, I would offer, as my evidence, X's exhibit's A-N

Exhibit A

Exhibit B

Exhibit C

Exhibit D

Exhibit E

Exhibit F

Exhibit G

Exhibit H

Exhibit I

Exhibit J

Exhibit K
Exhibit L

Exhibit M

Exhibit N


I rest my case. Whether I've proven it, well, that'd be up to a jury.

Anyway, thanks for your participation in this little demonstration. :)
Click to expand...

And not one of those instances was I infracted for. I can even pop a screenie of my infraction list to prove my case. You, on the other hand, got a 3 day vacation for your attacks on me. Funny how that works, ain't it?

So while YOU might interpret them as personal attacks, the people that actually MATTER, don't. G'day! :2wave:
 
Last edited:
dontworrybehappy said:
And not one of those instances was I infracted for. I can even pop a screenie of my infraction list to prove my case.
Click to expand...
Do it, I dare ya.

You, on the other hand, got a 3 day vacation for your attacks on me. Funny how that works, ain't it?
Click to expand...
It was 2 days, not three, so there. :2razz:

So while YOU might interpret them as personal attacks, the people that actually MATTER, don't. G'day! :2wave:
Click to expand...
That's fine, that's their call. Just so you know, I didn't report any one of those. It's not the way I prefer to handle things.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom