Walter
Banned
- Joined
- Nov 19, 2008
- Messages
- 421
- Reaction score
- 83
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
I think this is fine for Wyoming. Wyoming is the least populous state, and so doesn't suffer from social issues that more urbanized states, such as California, facee. I also doubt that Wyoming is a major hub for organized crime, which is one reason why some states pass laws on prohibiting ex-cons from purchasing or owning a firearm.
Such has always been a States Right to regulate...but even so no state has the right to infringe upon private ownership in totality as the City of Chicago and the District of Columbia have found out. It is up to the citizens of each state to decide whether or not a state permit must be issued to arm oneself in PUBLIC...but there is no prohibiting ownership in the privacy of your own property. And what sane Citizen would authorize private ownership of Nuclear arms or heavy military attack weapons such as 50 Cal. machine guns..etc.? But...even if a state like Wyoming should authorize UNLIMITED ARMS, a neighboring state could make it against the law carry certain weapons into that state. Even as much as some progressives do not like the fact.....THE STATES BILL OF RIGHTS (amendments 1-10) have not been rescinded, and the State Constitutions are used for more than Federal **** Paper.
Last edited: