• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Obama Health-Care Reform Act Ruled Unconstitutional(edited)

Ok, you stated nobody loses any freedom...it's your statement to prove Boo...don't hide from it.

and....

Again, the present reform has incentives to add more more doctors.

Now, show us where this is true....show us from the Text.....not a Lefty Article.

Again, false. You really seem to be drinking the kool aid of the tired old tactics. No one loses any freedom.
 
You can't interpret facts without reasoning. Present some facts, and show your reasoning. That would be appropriate.

No, facts speak for themselves are unassailable. If you truly present facts, no reasoning is necessary.
 
why doesn't obama talk about his health care bill anymore?

recall immediately after he passed the pig (via senate reconciliation---LOL!), our poor, perplexed prez proclaimed his all out PUSH to make the piece popular

First Read - Obama agenda: Selling health care

he DROPPED that faster than the MOSQUE and GITMO

LOL!

so...

where are we today?

we see CONSERVATIVES (like anthony WEINER) all EAGER to discuss it, on and on we go

and BOO, the language challenged dept chair HISSELF

LOL!

ie, WHERE have all the self respecting progressives gone?

very revealing
 
No, facts speak for themselves are unassailable. If you truly present facts, no reasoning is necessary.

exactly, facts speak for themselves

three quarters of a tril in tax hikes, half a tril cuts to medicare while simultaneously expanding its already strained enrollment, a quarter tril dumped on the states in the form of medicaid (whose patients, according to the asa, do WORSE than their neighbors with NO insurance), docs running away despite the FIX, er costs thru the hospital roof, waivers for weiners everywhere, the double counting of a quarter tril according to cbo...

yup

let's keep talking obamacare

this is FUN

LOL!
 
Meaning as usual you have no idea as to what you are talking about...again.

I get it.

No. Burden of proof lies with the person making the affirmative claim. Failing to do so means you're running away. Present the evidence or admit you don't know what you're saying.
 
Ok, you stated nobody loses any freedom...it's your statement to prove Boo...don't hide from it.

and....

Again, the present reform has incentives to add more more doctors.

Now, show us where this is true....show us from the Text.....not a Lefty Article.

The first state was that we lose freedom. No evidence was given. I say it is BS. He has to present evidence. You don't prove the negative. The proof for that is in the absence of evidence. You really don't know how this works, do you?
 
No, facts speak for themselves are unassailable. If you truly present facts, no reasoning is necessary.

No, they actually don't. A fact doesn't tell us how or why. If we say health care costs are increasing. There would be factual information on that, but it would not tell us how or why. We would have to be able to reason and look at all factors and reach a reasonable conclusion. This requires the ability to reason.
 
I know you are running scared because you refuse to bck up the claims that YOU made ;)

The first state was that we lose freedom. No evidence was given. I say it is BS. He has to present evidence. You don't prove the negative. The proof for that is in the absence of evidence. You really don't know how this works, do you?
 
I know you are running scared because you refuse to bck up the claims that YOU made ;)
:lamo :lamo :lamo

I guess you have to tell yourself that to excuse your lack of evidence. But, the support for my claim is your lack of evidence. I can't help that you don't understand this. :coffeepap
 
Did you want to show m where the incentives were Boo?

:lamo :lamo :lamo

I guess you have to tell yourself that to excuse your lack of evidence. But, the support for my claim is your lack of evidence. I can't help that you don't understand this. :coffeepap
 
Did you want to show m where the incentives were Boo?

All you had to do was ask:

A New Focus on Education and Worker Training
This effort is just one part of a comprehensive, multi-faceted strategy to encourage and educate more physicians, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants to practice in primary care, including:

Fact Sheet: Creating Jobs and Increasing the Number of Primary Care Providers

The Affordable Care Act includes a comprehensive strategy to achieve these goals by investing in a new generation of primary caregivers through increased resources for training, new incentives to physicians for providing primary care to patients, and support for caregivers who choose to enter primary care in underserved areas.

On June 16, 2010, the Administration is announced a key step in that strategy – the availability of $250 million in new funding provided by the Affordable Care Act to expand the primary workforce. The new funding – part of the Prevention and Public Health Fund – will help prepare the health system to meet the demand for health care workers with a new initiative that will train and support thousands of new doctors, nurses, nurse practitioners, and physician’s assistants.

Creating Jobs and Increasing the Number of Primary Care Providers | HealthCare.gov

http://www.healthcare.gov/center/brochures/rural_america.pdf
 
three LINKS!

all from THE WHITE HOUSE!

LOL!

what a SHILL

sebelius, i mean
 
You did NOT just quote something the Admin wrote as proof....

lmao.

All you had to do was ask:

A New Focus on Education and Worker Training
This effort is just one part of a comprehensive, multi-faceted strategy to encourage and educate more physicians, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants to practice in primary care, including:

Fact Sheet: Creating Jobs and Increasing the Number of Primary Care Providers

The Affordable Care Act includes a comprehensive strategy to achieve these goals by investing in a new generation of primary caregivers through increased resources for training, new incentives to physicians for providing primary care to patients, and support for caregivers who choose to enter primary care in underserved areas.

On June 16, 2010, the Administration is announced a key step in that strategy – the availability of $250 million in new funding provided by the Affordable Care Act to expand the primary workforce. The new funding – part of the Prevention and Public Health Fund – will help prepare the health system to meet the demand for health care workers with a new initiative that will train and support thousands of new doctors, nurses, nurse practitioners, and physician’s assistants.

Creating Jobs and Increasing the Number of Primary Care Providers | HealthCare.gov

http://www.healthcare.gov/center/brochures/rural_america.pdf
 
hey, that's what department chairs due

LOL!

beats wik!
 
Forcing us to have insurance is putting us under the control of HHS

that's what THOMAS BARTHOLD says

altho he'd probably point more specifically at the I-R-S
 
THREE links...

to the WHITE HOUSE!

LOL!

now, we've seen some funny stuff coming out of this language deprived department chair

but three LINKS...

from the WHITE HOUSE!

!!!

i mean, c'mon, you gotta ADMIT

that's pretty FUNNY!
 
No, they actually don't. A fact doesn't tell us how or why. If we say health care costs are increasing. There would be factual information on that, but it would not tell us how or why. We would have to be able to reason and look at all factors and reach a reasonable conclusion. This requires the ability to reason.

No, the how and why would be additional facts. None of them are open to your reasoning. Conclusions must be based on facts, not your "reasoning" which is just a synonym for your opinion.
 
No, the how and why would be additional facts. None of them are open to your reasoning. Conclusions must be based on facts, not your "reasoning" which is just a synonym for your opinion.

Fact: More than 98 percent of convicted felons are bread eaters.

Fact: Fully HALF of all children who grow up in bread-consuming households score below average on standardized tests.

Fact: More than 90 percent of violent crimes are committed within 24 hours of eating bread.

Fact: Newborn babies can choke on bread.

If you can't reason, you might conclude the following:

No sale of bread to minors.
No advertising of bread within 1000 feet of a school.
A 300 percent federal tax on all bread to pay for all the societal ills we might associate with bread.
No animal or human images, nor any primary colors (which may appeal to children) may be used to promote bread usage.
A $4.2 zillion fine on the three biggest bread manufacturers. Please send this e-mail on to everyone you know who cares about this crucial issue.


The ability to reason goes beyond facts, and no facts do not speak for themselves, and your conclusion, no matter what it is, is not equal to fact. It is telling that you don't understand this.
 
You did NOT just quote something the Admin wrote as proof....

lmao.

Do your own search, those were just the first links available. The fact is, those things are there. And I gave evidence. Where's your evidence that freedoms will be lost. none of you have present any evidence at all. :coffeepap
 
Back
Top Bottom