• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Health Care Reform Repeal Passes House

I have noticed that liberals mention reasons why Obama won't allow repeal of obamacare as "it would inflame his base", "he would lose the support of his party", "that would make the democratic party mad" or " vetoing it would reinvigorate his base" etc. Nothing is mentioned of the desire of the American people, the good of the country, etc. Everything obama does is about Obama, getting reelected, pleasing his base, etc. Nowhere is America or American people mentioned. Wow, just wow, lefties. Nothing like being blatent about your lack of care for the country and your sole desire to run Washington. I think zero respect has become negative respect for the left.

Hey guys, just a little FYI, the country comes first, not the democratic party.

He tried to stick to a campaign promise. I personally didn't use any of the above phrases, but what are we supposed to say? Obama did this because he believed that healthcare reform was actually for the good of the country? Whether or not that's true, it's not like any of the rest of you would actually believe that. And the ridicule would just continue.
 
Lets's just see how much pressure the GOP can actually put on Harry Reid to bring this up for vote first.
 
There's that same cockamamy talking point...:lamo

So, something that is true is a talking point? Must make it easier for you to ignore things that way. :coffeepap
 
So, something that is true is a talking point? Must make it easier for you to ignore things that way. :coffeepap

I've said MANY true things on this forum, backed up by multiple links to various sources... only to have liberal leaning posters tell me I am doing nothing but apouting 'talking points'. Not really fair when either side does it.
 
I've said MANY true things on this forum, backed up by multiple links to various sources... only to have liberal leaning posters tell me I am doing nothing but apouting 'talking points'. Not really fair when either side does it.

I don't disagree. I've never understood the talking point dodge at all. If something is true, it's true.
 
So, something that is true is a talking point? Must make it easier for you to ignore things that way. :coffeepap

It's not true.

It seems alotta folks just weren't paying attention back in November.
 
It's not true.

It seems alotta folks just weren't paying attention back in November.

No, it is true. It was true in Novemeber. On this issue, many who disliked the reform disliked it because it didn't go far enough and not that it did too much.
 
No, it is true. It was true in Novemeber. On this issue, many who disliked the reform disliked it because it didn't go far enough and not that it did too much.

That's why they voted the Dems out and the Reps in? Because the Reps were going to go farther with the healthcare bill?
 
Won't happen. Even if it gets past the Senate(which won't happen) Obama will veto it.
The president is saying he will veto it, we will see. He might end up sticking his finger in the air and testing the wind before he actually does that though. As I understand matters there are now 26 states fighting this bill (half the country) and numerous constitituional challenges to it. Add to that the fact that tomorrow the republicans will start going about other methods of defunding and defeating the bill. I think the chances that this bill will actually survive and be enacted as intended are pretty slim. With or without Obama's threatened veto. The president may yet decide that it is not in his best interest to veto the bill owing to public sentiment.
 
The president is saying he will veto it, we will see. He might end up sticking his finger in the air and testing the wind before he actually does that though. As I understand matters there are now 26 states fighting this bill (half the country) and numerous constitituional challenges to it. Add to that the fact that tomorrow the republicans will start going about other methods of defunding and defeating the bill. I think the chances that this bill will actually survive and be enacted as intended are pretty slim. With or without Obama's threatened veto. The president may yet decide that it is not in his best interest to veto the bill owing to public sentiment.

Obummer actually considering the desire of the American people? Don't hold your breath.
 
The bill isn't perfect but if it repeals all the way I feel bad for children with preexisting conditions and people who get cancer and can't get health insurance.
 
That's why they voted the Dems out and the Reps in? Because the Reps were going to go farther with the healthcare bill?

Really, apdst?!!! Please show us exactly how the Republicans were going to go further. This I'd like to see. Links, please.
 
They should repeal it and replace it with reforms from both sides. The Republicans should implement their cost cutting measures and allow insurance companies to sell accross state lines. The Democrats should write in a public option for anyone that choses it. Both sides win along with every economic class of Americans, especially the poor who cannot afford health insurance.
 
Really, apdst?!!! Please show us exactly how the Republicans were going to go further. This I'd like to see. Links, please.

Uh, CC, I think he was being sarcastic. Asking a question, maybe. :confused:
 
They should repeal it and replace it with reforms from both sides. The Republicans should implement their cost cutting measures and allow insurance companies to sell accross state lines. The Democrats should write in a public option for anyone that choses it. Both sides win along with every economic class of Americans, especially the poor who cannot afford health insurance.

Spoken like a true centrist, I like it.
 
Obummer actually considering the desire of the American people? Don't hold your breath.

I think he just might consider his desire to serve a second term, or at least serve his one term and leave out looking like an asshole and not a total asshole.
 
Read the POLL not the SOURCE. Poll done by CBS/New York Times.

LOL, yeah, they're certainly not biased. I'm sure those numbers are right when you only poll unemployed people from New York City.

Across the land, about 70+ percent are against it.

Go ahead, Democrats, run on this 2012. I dare ya. (A bunch of Dem will turncoat on this to save their butts. Watch.)
 
Really, apdst?!!! Please show us exactly how the Republicans were going to go further. This I'd like to see. Links, please.

I wasn't saying that they would. I was asking a question, that's why I put the, "?", at the end of the sentence.
 
I wasn't saying that they would. I was asking a question, that's why I put the, "?", at the end of the sentence.

Oh, sorry. Didn't see the "?" and it didn't make sense in the statement. I don't think the Republicans gaining so many seats was about the health care bill. I think it was about the economy in general.
 
Oh, sorry. Didn't see the "?" and it didn't make sense in the statement. I don't think the Republicans gaining so many seats was about the health care bill. I think it was about the economy in general.

I don't think it was just about healthcare, but it damn sure didn't help the Dems's cause.

I'm seeing this song-n-dance from Leftists, claiming that the reason the Dems were voted out, is because the Dems weren't Liberal enough. Sorry, but I ain't buyin' it.
 
Back
Top Bottom