Re: Obama Administration's New Proposed Gun Regulation for Border States Met With Bip
Oh ok, if the politician says so I'll believe him
Do you really want me to post videos of Obama espousing socialist policies? Did you forget the "Joe the Plumber" incident? Did you forget the comment about how to get to socialized medicine? Did you forget his comments in his book about how business is the enemy of his world? Come on now, don't be so blindly ignorant.
You do understand that I am basing my logic off of actual statements and behavior and you are basing your "logic" off of racist (yes...you are a racist) assumptions.
Do you even see how you are racist? Where did I say I hate Obama? I dislike his policies, but that is because we are ideologically polar opposites and has nothing to do with his race. I dislike Pelosi's policies and Reed's policies equally. By your incredibly stupid logic (I use that term very loosely because I believe there is very little brain power behind anything you just posted) I hate women and white people too. Let's tack on some more...I don't like the policies of Sotomayor so I must hate Latinos too. I'm not a big fan of the EU and UN so I must hate all the people of all the countries over seas as well.
Now, I'm sick of defending myself from accusations of ignorant racist liberals like your self. If you are too stupid to see your own bigotry, that is not my fault.
No, sir. By my logic, you're a racist for proscribing Obama to a militant racist group and ideology, because of his political leaning. Therein lies the difference -- and it is a marked one, I assure you.
Now, as for the socialist bit -- I realise that someone as ingrained with conservative values as yourself won't ever admit to such a thing, but (and here comes the sun), "Socialism isn't evil".
Putting aside your American knee-jerk mouth-foaming reaction to the word 'socialism', I'll point out that one can espouse socialist ideas, while not being a socialist, just the same as I, a socialist, can espouse some conservative values, while not being a conservative.
If you wish to label the man a socialist (which I might point out is something we could only wish for), you must look at the policies he's implemented, and those he's failed to implement. He has implemented some socialist policies (albeit badly, unfortunately), and many more liberal democratic policies, along with acquiescing to some conservative policies. To me, that would place him squarely in the liberal democrat (or just Democrat, in the States) camp, while still allowing for non-partisan (or bi-partisan, if there're only two parties) co-operation and the fair appraisal of each policy, based on how it would affect the nation, not his party's ideological stance on it.
Labelling him a socialist any further would be turning a blind eye to all the non-socialist policies he's passed through, and all the socialist policies that've failed to pass -- thus making you, as I said, ignorant.
As well, the blanket claim that, as a politician, Obama MUST be lying is laughable. Do politicians lie? Of course. Does everything they say necessarily have to be a lie? No, of course not. The likelihood of him lying about his political leanings to become some sort of socialist sleeper-cell and turn the USA into the USSA is absolutely stupid. If he says he's not a socialist, he's not a socialist. If he says he IS a socialist, then he's probably a socialist. You didn't start calling him a neo-con when he refused to shut down Gitmo, did you?
You're a fearmonger, and you fall prey to your own fearful ramblings.
Cease the personal attacks.
