• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Sarah Palin accuses critics of "blood libel"

This is absurd. Liberals would be attacking her punctuation if they nothing else.


j-mac
 
j-mac said:
Liberals would be attacking her punctuation if they nothing else.


j-mac
Click to expand...


Now that you mentioned it, I nothing elsed just yesterday, and I punctuated my nothing else by adding in a something fishy.
 
Gardener said:
Now that you mentioned it, I nothing elsed just yesterday, and I punctuated my nothing else by adding in a something fishy.
Click to expand...

Oh clever...Listen I am on my lap top, with a spotty connection....So I mistyped...you got me....:roll:


j-mac
 
Gardener said:
Now that you mentioned it, I nothing elsed just yesterday, and I punctuated my nothing else by adding in a something fishy.
Click to expand...

Oh clever...Listen I am on my lap top, with a spotty connection....So I mistyped...you got me....:roll:


j-mac
 
j-mac said:
Oh clever.

j-mac
Click to expand...


Now, that's something that certainly bears repeating, J-Mac.

It sure beats the sweeping generalizations about liberals.
 
j-mac said:
Obvious problems recognizing sarcasm.


j-mac
Click to expand...

No need for any personal confessionals. Just knowing that you were so moved by my cleverocity that you would post twice about it is thanks enough for me.
 
Opinions are like assholes... everyone has one... now Noodle... let's break your post down:

The Giant Noodle said:
Your child-like logic keeps on going and making an ass out of your platform. You actually make liberals look GOOD. Just because (and I know you cant understand this zimmer because it takes logic and reasoning) someone knows Palin is a moron doesnt mean they are a liberal.
Click to expand...
No... you missed the point. It done flewed right over yer hed son.
The poster made the point that he had a Republican friend who decided not to vote for Palin "When McCain picker her as his running mate." See Enigma's OP below. Now... this is pure bull**** because NOBODY knew who Palin was. Not even the press. So to me that type of BS indicates the poster has some motive... probably a Lib leaning motive.

EnigmaO01 said:
I'm not a liberal. Just because I think she's out of her league and an idiot doesn't automatically make me a liberal. I have a staunch republican friend in Idaho that feels the same way about here. When McCain picked her as his running mate he no longer supported McCain.
Click to expand...



Palin lost the 2008 election for McCain.
Click to expand...
It's been proven otherwise... but if you think so... then fine. Your opinion. Wrong again, but yours.

This is funny. Obama sits in The Church of Vile for 20-years. He's OK. Obama works with terrorists and terror supporters... and Obama's OK. Obama is an ACORN Alinskyite... but that's OK. Obama believes Cap gains should be increased for fairness, even though it will screw millions... and proven so, and will bring in less government revenue... That's OK. Obama wants to tax and spread the wealth around... that's OK.

And you don't vote for McCain because of Palin... who forgot more about how America works than Obama will ever know!? Pfffffffffffffft... ROTFLOL... Retarded I say, but hey... never before has a VP swung an election and we are supposed to believe she did? Rrrrrrrrrrright.

At first glance it was a great idea. That is until she started speaking. AS much as I dont care that much for Obama, America is MUCH better off with Obama in office than having Sarah Palin as VP.
Click to expand...
That is retarded and you're sounding like a Lib... not a Libertarian.

She didnt even know what that position DID 100% for christs sake! Anyways zimmer you are SOOOOOOOOO biased that you cant think rationally regarding politics. Conservatives are always better than anyother party no matter what for you and that is a MAJOR problem. Without thinking objectively your words are useless.
Click to expand...
Let's say for argument sake she can't name a case in the SCOTUS, let's say she had a couple poor interviews. What she does have that Obama lacks, is an understanding what makes America work. Obama hasn't a clue. He's way in over his head, and it shows.

Now you and Enigma might do well to change your political lean to Lib. At least be honest about who you are.

.
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
BULL**** ALERT​

EnigmaO01 said:
You're wrong. My friend knew she was a moron as soon as she opened her mouth. Unlike yourself apparently he was hoping on a serious VP he could believe in. I think the comment where she said she was like a soccer mom turned him immediately.
Click to expand...

You said he knew when he picked her. Now it is when she opened her mouth. Next it will be after her interview with Couric.

INTERESTING.

You see, I have a pretty good memory, and after she was picked McCain's numbers went up because of her speeches. At the RNC she rocked the house... so once again... I smell the clear stench of manure.

Nice try... but try it on someone else. I ain't buy'in.

.
 
Last edited:
ludahai said:
See bold... checking Wikipedia was your first mistake...
Click to expand...

Checking any source that is factual and strives for objectivity is a mistake in the ideas of a regressive..... The only authoritive, impeccable source to a conservative is Fox. I never saw a group of people so afraid of facts.

Please list 10 examples of material Wikipedia errors or stand down.
 
j-mac said:
This is absurd. Liberals would be attacking her punctuation if they nothing else.


j-mac
Click to expand...

No worries, she so naturally produces so much attackable material that no one notices her punctuation.

She isn't going anywhere in politics. When will this boring circus act move on?
 
ludahai said:
I guess you haven't read the links that have been posted to note that the phrase has grown in meaning over the 20th century... and liberals like to call conservatives closed-minded... shesh...
Click to expand...

I wasn't replying to you. Note who I quoted before posting next time.
 
upsideguy said:
Checking any source that is factual and strives for objectivity is a mistake in the ideas of a regressive..... The only authoritive, impeccable source to a conservative is Fox. I never saw a group of people so afraid of facts.

Please list 10 examples of material Wikipedia errors or stand down.
Click to expand...

You're joking right ????

They have so many errors that they have been sued for libel countless times. There was even a scientific study published in the journal Nature that proved Wiki has hundreds of errors in it.
 
Do I understand it correctly, Palin is comparing the heated opposition she is facing (which she fueled herself with equally heated rhetorics) with the persecution of Jews by the Nazis?

WTF? Is she even in her right mind? Could it become any more tasteless?

I didn't like Palin before and this certainly doesn't help to change my opinion.

At any rate, I'm glad so many here agree that all sides should tone down their rhetorics. We're all not enemies, but opponents at worst, who respectfully disagree what's best for the country, and politicians run in fair competitions against each other. We shouldn't forget that.
 
German guy said:
Do I understand it correctly, Palin is comparing the heated opposition she is facing (which she fueled herself with equally heated rhetorics) with the persecution of Jews by the Nazis?

WTF? Is she even in her right mind? Could it become any more tasteless?

I didn't like Palin before and this certainly doesn't help to change my opinion.

At any rate, I'm glad so many here agree that all sides should tone down their rhetorics. We're all not enemies, but opponents at worst, who respectfully disagree what's best for the country, and politicians run in fair competitions against each other. We shouldn't forget that.
Click to expand...

I very seriously doubt that Palin had a clue about "blood libel" having a connection to anti-Semitism. You can't see Israel from any part of Alaska.
 
German guy said:
Do I understand it correctly, Palin is comparing the heated opposition she is facing (which she fueled herself with equally heated rhetorics) with the persecution of Jews by the Nazis?
Click to expand...

No, she is not. The left would have you believe that, just as they tried to get people to believe that her and conservatives were responsible for the Tucson shootings.
 
independent_thinker2002 said:
I very seriously doubt that Palin had a clue about "blood libel" having a connection to anti-Semitism. You can't see Israel from any part of Alaska.
Click to expand...

Gee, more unfounded speculation... You all will never learn the meaning of honesty, will you?
 
Grim17 said:
No, she is not. The left would have you believe that, just as they tried to get people to believe that her and conservatives were responsible for the Tucson shootings.
Click to expand...

You know what "blood libel" means, do you?
 
upsideguy said:
Please list 10 examples of material Wikipedia errors or stand down.
Click to expand...

You weren't replying to me, but they have countless errors. I'm not going to name 10, but if you look back in this thread just a page or two, you'll see Haymarket, who apparently hates palin, state that he checked her wiki page out while her name was being floated about. Apaprently between then and the time she was actually nominated, someone had changed the page entirely.
 
Grim17 said:
Gee, more unfounded speculation... You all will never learn the meaning of honesty, will you?
Click to expand...

Did you even read what I wrote or do you just use a pre-written response?
 
Palin is comparing the heated opposition she is facing (which she fueled herself with equally heated rhetorics) with the persecution of Jews by the Nazis?
Click to expand...

Yes you are mistaken.

At any rate, I'm glad so many here agree that all sides should tone down their rhetorics.
Click to expand...

Let the people on the left, who started these attacks against the right, shut their mouths and I’m betting that the issue will fade away.

I very seriously doubt that Palin had a clue about "blood libel"
Click to expand...

When I was a kid “GAY” meant to have fun. I guess it still does, for those who like that kind of fun, but it may very well be that Palin used those words to explain exactly what she meant. Accusing the right of a liability for the blood shed in the AZ shootings.
 
German guy said:
You know what "blood libel" means, do you?
Click to expand...

It's been discussed in this thread ad nauseum, so I think most on here do by now. The question is, does it mean the same thing it did 400 years ago or has it evolved. The word "Crusade" meant something entirely different 400 years ago than it does now. Words evolve.

Assuming a word has only meaning is a big mistake.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom