- Joined
- Mar 11, 2009
- Messages
- 41,104
- Reaction score
- 12,202
- Location
- South Carolina
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
This is absurd. Liberals would be attacking her punctuation if they nothing else.
j-mac
j-mac
What's the difference between "blood libel" and "blood slander"?
Why would anyone care if Palin is a hemophiliac?
Liberals would be attacking her punctuation if they nothing else.
j-mac
Now that you mentioned it, I nothing elsed just yesterday, and I punctuated my nothing else by adding in a something fishy.
Now that you mentioned it, I nothing elsed just yesterday, and I punctuated my nothing else by adding in a something fishy.
Loughner video with 'genocide' and 'torture' ramblings is released - latimes.com
Here's the video that got loughner kicked out of school. Too bad he wasn't forced to get a mental evaluation. People might still be alive.
Doubtful. Not sure he was doing anything he could get arrested or detained for. There's freedom of speech remember?
Oh clever.
j-mac
Now, that's something that certainly bears repeating, J-Mac.
It sure beats the sweeping generalizations about liberals.
Obvious problems recognizing sarcasm.
j-mac
No... you missed the point. It done flewed right over yer hed son.Your child-like logic keeps on going and making an ass out of your platform. You actually make liberals look GOOD. Just because (and I know you cant understand this zimmer because it takes logic and reasoning) someone knows Palin is a moron doesnt mean they are a liberal.
The poster made the point that he had a Republican friend who decided not to vote for Palin "When McCain picker her as his running mate." See Enigma's OP below. Now... this is pure bull**** because NOBODY knew who Palin was. Not even the press. So to me that type of BS indicates the poster has some motive... probably a Lib leaning motive.
I'm not a liberal. Just because I think she's out of her league and an idiot doesn't automatically make me a liberal. I have a staunch republican friend in Idaho that feels the same way about here. When McCain picked her as his running mate he no longer supported McCain.
It's been proven otherwise... but if you think so... then fine. Your opinion. Wrong again, but yours.Palin lost the 2008 election for McCain.
This is funny. Obama sits in The Church of Vile for 20-years. He's OK. Obama works with terrorists and terror supporters... and Obama's OK. Obama is an ACORN Alinskyite... but that's OK. Obama believes Cap gains should be increased for fairness, even though it will screw millions... and proven so, and will bring in less government revenue... That's OK. Obama wants to tax and spread the wealth around... that's OK.
And you don't vote for McCain because of Palin... who forgot more about how America works than Obama will ever know!? Pfffffffffffffft... ROTFLOL... Retarded I say, but hey... never before has a VP swung an election and we are supposed to believe she did? Rrrrrrrrrrright.
That is retarded and you're sounding like a Lib... not a Libertarian.At first glance it was a great idea. That is until she started speaking. AS much as I dont care that much for Obama, America is MUCH better off with Obama in office than having Sarah Palin as VP.
Let's say for argument sake she can't name a case in the SCOTUS, let's say she had a couple poor interviews. What she does have that Obama lacks, is an understanding what makes America work. Obama hasn't a clue. He's way in over his head, and it shows.She didnt even know what that position DID 100% for christs sake! Anyways zimmer you are SOOOOOOOOO biased that you cant think rationally regarding politics. Conservatives are always better than anyother party no matter what for you and that is a MAJOR problem. Without thinking objectively your words are useless.
Now you and Enigma might do well to change your political lean to Lib. At least be honest about who you are.
.
You're wrong. My friend knew she was a moron as soon as she opened her mouth. Unlike yourself apparently he was hoping on a serious VP he could believe in. I think the comment where she said she was like a soccer mom turned him immediately.
See bold... checking Wikipedia was your first mistake...
This is absurd. Liberals would be attacking her punctuation if they nothing else.
j-mac
I guess you haven't read the links that have been posted to note that the phrase has grown in meaning over the 20th century... and liberals like to call conservatives closed-minded... shesh...
Checking any source that is factual and strives for objectivity is a mistake in the ideas of a regressive..... The only authoritive, impeccable source to a conservative is Fox. I never saw a group of people so afraid of facts.
Please list 10 examples of material Wikipedia errors or stand down.
Do I understand it correctly, Palin is comparing the heated opposition she is facing (which she fueled herself with equally heated rhetorics) with the persecution of Jews by the Nazis?
WTF? Is she even in her right mind? Could it become any more tasteless?
I didn't like Palin before and this certainly doesn't help to change my opinion.
At any rate, I'm glad so many here agree that all sides should tone down their rhetorics. We're all not enemies, but opponents at worst, who respectfully disagree what's best for the country, and politicians run in fair competitions against each other. We shouldn't forget that.
Do I understand it correctly, Palin is comparing the heated opposition she is facing (which she fueled herself with equally heated rhetorics) with the persecution of Jews by the Nazis?
I very seriously doubt that Palin had a clue about "blood libel" having a connection to anti-Semitism. You can't see Israel from any part of Alaska.
No, she is not. The left would have you believe that, just as they tried to get people to believe that her and conservatives were responsible for the Tucson shootings.
Please list 10 examples of material Wikipedia errors or stand down.
Gee, more unfounded speculation... You all will never learn the meaning of honesty, will you?
Palin is comparing the heated opposition she is facing (which she fueled herself with equally heated rhetorics) with the persecution of Jews by the Nazis?
At any rate, I'm glad so many here agree that all sides should tone down their rhetorics.
I very seriously doubt that Palin had a clue about "blood libel"
You know what "blood libel" means, do you?