• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Appeals court turns to state on key Prop. 8 issue Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/c

Chappy

User
DP Veteran
Joined
Nov 24, 2009
Messages
2,443
Reaction score
733
Location
San Francisco
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Liberal
Excerpted from “Appeals court turns to state on key Prop. 8 issue” By Bob Egelko, Chronicle Staff Writer, The San Francisco Chronicle, Tuesday, January 4, 2011
[SIZE="+2"]T[/SIZE]he federal appeals court reviewing California's ban on same-sex marriage asked the state Supreme Court today to answer a legal question that may determine the outcome of the case - whether a ballot measure's sponsors can defend it in court when state officials refuse to do so.

However, the Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco also made it clear how it believes the question should be answered - saying California would be "ill-served" if the sponsors of the 2008 initiative that banned same-sex marriage were barred from making their case. …

If the Protect Marriage group has standing in the case, it will allow the federal review to proceed; otherwise the work of Former U.S. Solicitor General Theodore B. Olson and David Boies will be for not; a disappointing outcome despite having re-established California marriage equality.
 
Back
Top Bottom