• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Oil rises above $90 amid US crude supply drop

the problem is a lot bigger than instability in the middle east


Duh................... We were warned a year ago this was coming. This is just the beginning.

US military warns oil output may dip causing massive shortages by 2015
• Shortfall could reach 10m barrels a day, report says
• Cost of crude oil is predicted to top $100 a barrel
 
you were warned---another winning slogan from the class hate junta

seeya at the polls, pal
 
you were warned---another winning slogan from the class hate junta

seeya at the polls, pal

The polls have no affect on peak oil.
 
Earlier this week, Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton told "Early Show" co-anchor Erica Hill in an exclusive interview that the administration believes, "it's important that this not be an American, or a NATO, or a European effort. It needs to be an international one."

She's right. It's time we stopped being the World's Police Man much less footing all the bills for doing so. Europe is being hurt more financially than we are with this crisis. Let them friggin' fix it. We'll assist on this one, but they foot the bill.
 


What does the failed cap and trade bill have to do with the price of oil? Please try to stay on topic. It is very annoying when when you suddenly jump to another topic that has nothing to do with the thread.
 
what does the failed cap and trade have to do with the price of oil?

LOL!

it's only THE PRESIDENT'S entire ENERGY POLICY

and, yes, it is already FAILED

i'd be stunned anyone would have to ask

except...
 
what does the failed cap and trade have to do with the price of oil?

LOL!

it's only THE PRESIDENT'S entire ENERGY POLICY

and, yes, it is already FAILED

i'd be stunned anyone would have to ask

except...

Except you left out the largest investment in Nuclear power and other alternative forms of energy of any administration in history. And you left out the increase schedule to meet increased CAFE standards. And you left out that US oil production increased under this administration to the highest its been since 2003.
 
Last edited:
Except you left out the largest investment in Nuclear power and other alternative forms of energy of any administration in history. And you left out the increase schedule to meet increased CAFE standards. And you left out that US oil production increased under this administration to the highest its been since 2003.


Obama and the EPA want to continue a failed program of ethanol and increase the amount of ethanol to 15%.

I will get better fuel milage and have less engine problems because I use ethanol free gas. I suspect soon Obama will also take away the right to buy ethanol free gas.
 
wrong, even the Sierra Club has come around in favor of nuclear....Obama has an engineer for an energy secretary. While Obama may know nothing about engineering and energy, he at least knows to pick someone who does.

Nice talk, where are any expedited permits. Where are the speeches imploring building of specific plants versus general B.S. How much better off would this country be if we had built 100 nuclear power plants with the stimulus money. Something that would have a positive impact on our society for the next 50 years instead of repaving roads which has no meaningful impact.
 
Nice talk, where are any expedited permits. Where are the speeches imploring building of specific plants versus general B.S. How much better off would this country be if we had built 100 nuclear power plants with the stimulus money. Something that would have a positive impact on our society for the next 50 years instead of repaving roads which has no meaningful impact.
Expedited permits? other liberals would file suit immediately.....
yes, we should have been building new nukes all along, but we didn't. Who takes the blame for that? or credit, based on your viewpoint.
We wouldn't need a substantial percentage of the power plants we have now if we all decided to conserve electricity.
Where is the expedited effort there?
 
Obama and the EPA want to continue a failed program of ethanol and increase the amount of ethanol to 15%.

I will get better fuel milage and have less engine problems because I use ethanol free gas. I suspect soon Obama will also take away the right to buy ethanol free gas.

I am not a fan of ethanol either, I would prefer to pay the extra price it would cost without. You convince everyone a price increase is necessary to avoid ethanol, and I'm with you! LOL!
 
Is it really true that you do not understand the difference between spending money and a loan guarantee?

They can't be built without loan guarantees from the government because private sector lenders think they are too risky. From the same article:

"Free-market groups complained that the loan guarantees could leave taxpayers on the hook for projects too risky for the private sector to finance."

If the private sector lenders were correct in their risk assessment, we are out $8 billion dollars. Which administration has ever committed more funding for Nuclear Power?
 
Not to worry. The news people on FOX news were smiling and laughing this morning saying gas prices are sure to drop because of the reduced driving by the Japanese after the disaster. I thought I had heard everything but they shocked me again.
 
Not to worry. The news people on FOX news were smiling and laughing this morning saying gas prices are sure to drop because of the reduced driving by the Japanese after the disaster. I thought I had heard everything but they shocked me again.

"after the break, pulling the wings off butterflys"....sure to be a crowd pleaser.

Fox News is puke served on a silver platter...
 
"after the break, pulling the wings off butterflys"....sure to be a crowd pleaser.

Fox News is puke served on a silver platter...

It did make me want to hurl.
 
Expedited permits? other liberals would file suit immediately.....
yes, we should have been building new nukes all along, but we didn't. Who takes the blame for that? or credit, based on your viewpoint.


Blame the EPA, and the whacko environmentalists like Martin Sheen that would chain themselves to the gates with a cross claiming some moral high ground. Now when we need to rely more on that tech we find ourselves behind the rest of the world when it comes to nuke tech for power.....Good job!


We wouldn't need a substantial percentage of the power plants we have now if we all decided to conserve electricity.
Where is the expedited effort there?


Ah the famous Jimmah Carter 'wear an extry sweater' speech. You know he was a laughing stock then when he said it, and now it just makes you look foolish. Everything from our Auto's to our homes have become so energy efficient to the point of climate controlled buildings making some sick because they won't let germs out. This country has enough resource to be energy independent for hundreds of years, and with the money saved we could invest in alternate energy supplies for the future. Rather than the back ass way liberals want to pursue it which is drive cost up, starve the people until we have no choice but to start over as we sit in the dark.... Get with the program man, I know you are a smart guy, but damn, you can't be this duped.


j-mac
 
Ah the famous Jimmah Carter 'wear an extry sweater' speech. You know he was a laughing stock then when he said it, and now it just makes you look foolish. Everything from our Auto's to our homes have become so energy efficient to the point of climate controlled buildings making some sick because they won't let germs out. This country has enough resource to be energy independent for hundreds of years, and with the money saved we could invest in alternate energy supplies for the future. Rather than the back ass way liberals want to pursue it which is drive cost up, starve the people until we have no choice but to start over as we sit in the dark.... Get with the program man, I know you are a smart guy, but damn, you can't be this duped.


j-mac
Had we followed Carters policies we would be energy independent by now, but morons like you thought conservation, increasing fuel efficiency and eliminating waste were just too much of an inconvenience.
Carters policies actually started to work driving down oil company profits, so Reagan scrapped them.

Carter a laughing stock when he gave his speech? Hardly. He was dead on in what needed to be done. Too bad profits were more important.

If we fail to act soon, we will face an economic, social and political crisis that will threaten our free institutions.

But we still have another choice. We can begin to prepare right now. We can decide to act while there is time.

That is the concept of the energy policy we will present on Wednesday. Our national energy plan is based on ten fundamental principles.

The first principle is that we can have an effective and comprehensive energy policy only if the government takes responsibility for it and if the people understand the seriousness of the challenge and are willing to make sacrifices.

The second principle is that healthy economic growth must continue. Only by saving energy can we maintain our standard of living and keep our people at work. An effective conservation program will create hundreds of thousands of new jobs.

The third principle is that we must protect the environment. Our energy problems have the same cause as our environmental problems -- wasteful use of resources. Conservation helps us solve both at once.

The fourth principle is that we must reduce our vulnerability to potentially devastating embargoes. We can protect ourselves from uncertain supplies by reducing our demand for oil, making the most of our abundant resources such as coal, and developing a strategic petroleum reserve.

The fifth principle is that we must be fair. Our solutions must ask equal sacrifices from every region, every class of people, every interest group. Industry will have to do its part to conserve, just as the consumers will. The energy producers deserve fair treatment, but we will not let the oil companies profiteer.

The sixth principle, and the cornerstone of our policy, is to reduce the demand through conservation. Our emphasis on conservation is a clear difference between this plan and others which merely encouraged crash production efforts. Conservation is the quickest, cheapest, most practical source of energy. Conservation is the only way we can buy a barrel of oil for a few dollars. It costs about $13 to waste it.

The seventh principle is that prices should generally reflect the true replacement costs of energy. We are only cheating ourselves if we make energy artificially cheap and use more than we can really afford.

The eighth principle is that government policies must be predictable and certain. Both consumers and producers need policies they can count on so they can plan ahead. This is one reason I am working with the Congress to create a new Department of Energy, to replace more than 50 different agencies that now have some control over energy.

The ninth principle is that we must conserve the fuels that are scarcest and make the most of those that are more plentiful. We can't continue to use oil and gas for 75 percent of our consumption when they make up seven percent of our domestic reserves. We need to shift to plentiful coal while taking care to protect the environment, and to apply stricter safety standards to nuclear energy.

The tenth principle is that we must start now to develop the new, unconventional sources of energy we will rely on in the next century.

These ten principles have guided the development of the policy I would describe to you and the Congress on Wednesday.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom