• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Oil rises above $90 amid US crude supply drop

Foreign Oil Dependence Has Grown

"In 1973, when President Richard Nixon said, “Our independence will depend on maintaining and achieving self-sufficiency in energy,” the United States imported 34.8 percent of its oil from foreign countries. In 1979, when President Jimmy Carter said the country will “never again use more foreign oil than we did in 1977,” imports were up to 45 percent of the nation’s oil supply. Dependence on foreign oil did indeed fall during a few economically troubled years when smaller, foreign-built cars gained popularity and American manufacturers reduced the weight of their vehicles. But that began to change when oil prices dropped in the mid-1980s, and by 1990, when President George H.W. Bush talked of the need to reverse “excessive dependence on foreign oil” at the dawn of the first Persian Gulf War, the United States was importing 42.2 percent of its oil. By the time his son ran for office, sport utility vehicles ruled the roads and 52.9 percent of the nation’s petroleum came from overseas. By 2006, when President Bush declared in his State of the Union that the nation was addicted to oil, foreign countries were delivering 59.9 percent of the fix. Geology has dealt the United States a bad hand if it hopes to achieve energy independence while continuing to rely heavily on oil. America’s old fields are tapped out; U.S. oil production has been in an inexorable decline since its peak in 1971. The government has pushed for the oil industry to squeeze out more domestic supply. Federal subsidies approved by Congress in 1995 encouraged a boom in oil drilling in the deep waters of the Gulf of Mexico. And the Bush administration’s Department of the Interior streamlined the process for drilling on federal lands, nearly doubling the number of permits approved each year. Nonetheless, U.S. oil production plummeted 22 percent over the past 10 years to about the same level that the nation’s oil fields were producing in 1947."
Broken Government | Failure: Foreign Oil Dependence Has Grown
 
I want to read exactly what Bill's explanation is, not Boehner's not some other, but his. And now yours. The failure to answer this simple question shows the weakness of your class warfare argument, and the disingenuousness of your argument. Now, would you like to answer the questions? or do I get more obfuscation?

j-mac

I suppose you would also like me to explain for you what the definition if IS is? You can't bully me into doing your homework for you, this isn't high school. Well, it isn't for me, it might be for you.
As The Prof would say, GROW UP......
 
today:

The average price of a gallon of regular gasoline continued its march to $4, hitting $3.96, the Energy Information Administration reported Monday afternoon. That’s 8 cents higher than last week and 86 cents higher than on Jan. 31.

U.S. gas prices rise again - Dan Berman - POLITICO.com

good news, greenies

tell dr chu we're gettin there
 
vote obama, 2012!

the elitist economic forces will do as they please!

The Federal Reserve, in a dramatic effort to rev up a "disappointingly slow" economic recovery, said it will buy $600 billion of U.S. government bonds over the next eight months to drive down interest rates and encourage more borrowing and growth.
 
jan 11, 2011:

Last November, as the economic recovery appeared to falter, the Fed said it would buy a new round of $600 billion in Treasury securities through June of this year. That's on top of the $1.7 trillion in Treasuries and mortgage-backed securities it had purchased in response to the financial crisis.

Still, the pitfalls of the Fed's approach are almost as numerous as the lending facilities it undertook to stem the crisis. Perhaps most daunting, the Fed's purchases of Treasury debt and mortgage-backed securities have effectively turned it into a mammoth investor -- a thoroughly undiversified one.

QE: Trillions of Dollars | Reuters
 
Last edited:
lol, the odd thing is, i think is insane

I didn't say vote Obama

O well

Maybe you don't know what you're talking about?

Maybe you just post links and hope you sound smart...

See this isnt "change"

Bernanke is a smart guy

Who's doing a really dumb thing

It's like trying to save a sinking cruise ship with a bucket up...

Print money

Last resort of banana republics

But its ok

Obamas got it under control...

Rght?
 
vote obama, 2012!

perhaps you'd prefer to live in venezuela!

LOL!

steven chu, obama's energy secty---we need gas prices like europe

pretty much says it all

seeya at the polls, progressives
 
That's because they pay so much in taxes. Instead our taxes are raided from highway funds and instead diverted toward transit projects that are a horrible investment in terms of the return.

Go back through the thread, its already been documented that our gas prices are so much lower than the rest of the world because of our heavy subsidies to the oil companies through our taxes.

I thought you were opposed to higher taxes?
 
Last edited:
Healthcare reform will produce an additional tax burden of $3.9 billion in 2019 alone for families making less than $200,000, according to Congress’ Joint Committee on Taxation.

Less partisan website, especially one known for using facts next time please. As for that $3.9 billion would you rather have them pay it or the rich/debt financed?

The new plan restricts the medical expense deduction, which is commonly used by the elderly or those with a serious illness, to raise $15.2 billion in 10 years.

Starting in 2013, you can only deduct medical expenses greater than 10 percent of your adjusted gross income (AGI). Now the threshold is 7.5 percent. That increase starts for older taxpayers in 2017.

You realize that very few people actually use this no? Furthermore, the actual use of it is during catastrophic events where the 2.5% different won't change anything relevant. Plus the relevant portion of HSAs hasn't changed. All this will do is incentivize more contributions to HSAs. Which is a good thing.

By 2019, when the law fully kicks in, the deduction reduction will hurt 14.8 million taxpayers — 14.7 million of whom will earn less than $200,000 a year, according to the committee, whose report was obtained by The Hill newspaper.

That includes single and joint filers and heads of households.

Better then debt financing or I dare say taxing the rich.
 
No. I want you stop pulling the "change my argumentswhever I get my ass kicked" bull****.

This coming from The Master of putting words in other people's mouths they never uttered and arguing those points because you were getting your ass kicked.

Isn't it ironic, dontcha think?

.
 
What's your evidence that he 'wants' gas prices hight?

His choice for energy secretary

Times Tough for Energy Overhaul - WSJ.com

In a sign of one major internal difference, Mr. Chu has called for gradually ramping up gasoline taxes over 15 years to coax consumers into buying more-efficient cars and living in neighborhoods closer to work.

"Somehow we have to figure out how to boost the price of gasoline to the levels in Europe," Mr. Chu, who directs the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory in California, said in an interview with The Wall Street Journal in September.
 
Less partisan website, especially one known for using facts next time please. As for that $3.9 billion would you rather have them pay it or the rich/debt financed?



You realize that very few people actually use this no? Furthermore, the actual use of it is during catastrophic events where the 2.5% different won't change anything relevant. Plus the relevant portion of HSAs hasn't changed. All this will do is incentivize more contributions to HSAs. Which is a good thing.



Better then debt financing or I dare say taxing the rich.




So you admit the article is correct
 
The story in the OP, while old, confuses me. I thought we were told that the United States has so little oil and would manufacture so little oil even if we did ramp up drilling that it would not have a significant effect on the price of gasoline. And yet, even at our current levels, we were able to cause the price of oil to rise? Somehow that doesn't make sense
 
today: Heath Shuler floats gas tax holiday - Dan Berman - POLITICO.com

shuler is probably the current leader of the house bluedog remnant, if not arkansas' mike ross

shuler, tho only in his third term, is the one dem who stood up to his palsied speakeress in the depressing days after tsunami tuesday

he was defeated in his bid to replace her as party leader but i think he rose in the caucus as a result of his effort

shuler is the former quarterback of the washington redskins, a #1 draft choice who went absolutely bust (i saw him play in oakland, one of the worst qb performances i think i've ever witnessed in more than 40 years of attendance)

shuler, from NC11, is a very attractive man, a very good man, he ran in NC on values, he won his constituency over, he was on the list of folks like me heading into tsunami tuesday but we couldn't dislodge him, he beat us by 8 points

shuler is pro life, pro gun and anti illegal immigration

fyi
 
Back
Top Bottom