• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Swedish Police Report Details Case Against Assange

Tashah

DP Veteran
Joined
May 25, 2005
Messages
18,379
Reaction score
9,233
Gender
Female
Political Leaning
Centrist
Swedish Police Report Details Case Against Assange
By John F. Burns and Ravi Somalya
Published: December 18, 2010

LONDON — Julian Assange, the founder of WikiLeaks who was released from a British jail late last week, is facing a new challenge: the leak of a 68-page confidential Swedish police report that sheds new light on the allegations of sexual misconduct that led to Mr. Assange’s legal troubles. The Swedish report traces events over a four-day period in August when Mr. Assange had what he has described as consensual sexual relationships with two Swedish women. Their accounts, which form the basis of an extradition case against Mr. Assange, state that their encounters with him began consensually, but became nonconsensual when he persisted in having unprotected sex with them in defiance of their insistence that he use a condom.

The Swedish document traces the accounts given by the two women of their intimate encounters with Mr. Assange. As previously reported, both women say that Mr. Assange first agreed to use a condom and then refused, in the first instance by continuing with sex after the condom broke, and in the second by having sex without using a condom with a woman who was asleep. Mr. Assange’s suspicions of political interference in the case were confirmed, he has said in recent days, by the decision of the Swedish prosecutors to drop the initial arrest warrant, and to downgrade the investigation to one of “molestation,” a minor offense. Those decisions were reversed in late August when the chief state prosecutor, Marianne Ny, overruling a subordinate prosecutor in Stockholm, Eva Finne, restored the original allegations, saying that rape was the appropriate charge for the evidence on file with the prosecutors.

Legal experts in Sweden have said that the decision was not unusual given the success that the women’s movement in Sweden has had over the last 30 years in recasting Sweden’s criminal laws on sexual issues, making them extremely protective of women’s rights. In an interview in Stockholm, plaintif's lawyer Claes Borgstrom said it was common under Sweden’s rape laws for men who force sex on women without a condom to face prosecution. “It’s a violation of sexual integrity, and it can be seen as rape,” he said.
Source: New York Times

If the allegations of forced unprotected sex are true, I would also consider this to constitute non-consensual sex and forced violation (rape).
 
the first woman felt so threatened and distressed with the 'incident' that she continued living with Assange and having sex with him for another week. the second woman felt so threatened and distressed with the 'incident' that she threw a party for Assagne that same night and then had sex with him again a couple of days later.

10 days in Sweden: the full allegations against Julian Assange | Media | The Guardian
Happy campers wouldn't have demanded that Mr. Assange be tested for sexually transmitted diseases. Both women here did so. He refused. Thus, the two women went to Stockholm’s Klara police station to seek advice on how to proceed.
 
Happy campers wouldn't have demanded that Mr. Assange be tested for sexually transmitted diseases. Both women here did so. He refused. Thus, the two women went to Stockholm’s Klara police station to seek advice on how to proceed.

So his wiki may not be the only thing that is leaking? :shock:
 
Source: New York Times

If the allegations of forced unprotected sex are true, I would also consider this to constitute non-consensual sex and forced violation (rape).

I'm an 18-year-old boy having sex with an 18-year-old girl. The condom breaks and I continue on despite her protests. Rape? I can't buy it. And besides that, prove it.

Same boy rolls over in bed and has sex with the girl lying next to him. She says, "Not if you're not going to use a condom." Again, I say, "prove it."

She said/he said simply cannot result in a guilty verdict. There'd better be bruises. There'd better be a rape kit. There'd better be a witness to yelling in the next room. On the basis of what I'm reading here, I don't believe those charges would have been filed in the U.S. I see these charges as much ado about nothing.
 
Source: New York Times

If the allegations of forced unprotected sex are true, I would also consider this to constitute non-consensual sex and forced violation (rape).

The forced part is what I would say is the issue. (also the lack of consent part when the women was sleeping would be considered rape)

If it was forced then it is rape, protected or unprotected.

But given the behaviour of the two women after the incidents took place I have doubts about thier claims
 
Last edited:
If they didn't go to forensics right away, it'll be hard to overcome reasonable doubt. Does Sweden have reasonable doubt thingy?
 
I don't believe those charges would have been filed in the U.S.
Perhaps. Perhaps not. The fact remains that they were filed in Sweden. The chief prosecutor there obviously believes sexual crimes were committed. I have no idea what the legal code in Sweden regarding a rape conviction entails. However, the article did produce this interesting excerpt...

Legal experts in Sweden have said that the decision was not unusual given the success that the women’s movement in Sweden has had over the last 30 years in recasting Sweden’s criminal laws on sexual issues, making them extremely protective of women’s rights.
The words "extremely protective" implies a definitive above the norm.
 
Those seem like pretty circumstantial allegations to me, but we'll have to see what the courts say. It's basically their word against his.

If a man is not using a condom it's your responsibility to know that before he is penetrating you, just as much as it's his responsibility to be wearing one. The allegation that he had sex with one of them while she was asleep and didn't use a condom seems highly unlikely to me. Like she wouldn't wake up? If she did and let him keep going, again it's her own fault for not turning around and asking the simple condom question.

I'm not the kind of person who blames rape victims but calling this rape is a stretch, and you can tell that Sweden is really trying to milk this obscure law in order to get Assange into custody.
 
I'm an 18-year-old boy having sex with an 18-year-old girl. The condom breaks and I continue on despite her protests. Rape? I can't buy it. And besides that, prove it.

Same boy rolls over in bed and has sex with the girl lying next to him. She says, "Not if you're not going to use a condom." Again, I say, "prove it."

She said/he said simply cannot result in a guilty verdict. There'd better be bruises. There'd better be a rape kit. There'd better be a witness to yelling in the next room. On the basis of what I'm reading here, I don't believe those charges would have been filed in the U.S. I see these charges as much ado about nothing.

I don't know about Sweedish law, but in the US, you don't need any physical violence to prove rape. Threat, incapacitation (victim being roofied, drunk beyond the ability to consent, or asleep) or coercion work just as well.
 
I don't know about Sweedish law, but in the US, you don't need any physical violence to prove rape. Threat, incapacitation (victim being roofied, drunk beyond the ability to consent, or asleep) or coercion work just as well.

I didn't mean to imply that one needed to show signs of physical violence. I was insisting that there would have to be proof beyond "He-Said She-Said" -- signs of violence being one way to do that. I probably wasn't too clear.
 
Last edited:
Bush & Congress mislead the entire country into war and nothing happens to any of them. Assange reveals information about the lies pushed through by our politicians and he goes to jail. The world is now officially run by ******s.
 
Back
Top Bottom