• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

'Don't ask' repeal fails in Senate

You lefties never get tired of playing the homophote, bigot or race card.........

Why does the GOP hate our troops? Isn't this like the first time in 48 years that Congress voted to not fund our troops. ;)
 
You lefties never get tired of playing the homophote, bigot or race card.........

Not if it is absolutely 100% true and you know it is. Give me a valid argument against the repeal that isn't "I'm not a homophobe. Playing the 'bigot card' is unfair!" And how on earth am I playing the "race card?" Homosexuals aren't a race.
 
Last edited:
It's only a matter of time. Plenty other discriminatory laws have been enforced and later repealed in our military.
 
yeah, homophobia still alive and well...

Go America!
 
We shall see my left wing friend.....I doubt if good morals will drop in that short period of time....It took many years for God to destroy Sodom.....

Ahh, so you're back to it being a moral God-mandated issue then. I take it you're officially backing off of your promise to accept this if the military was ok with it, then? After all, surely God's Will (tm) would override even the will of the American people and the American military.

Settle it, NP. I think you were full of crap when you made that promise.
 
We shall see my left wing friend.....I doubt if good morals will drop in that short period of time....It took many years for God to destroy Sodom.....

Liars don't get to talk about good morals. You loudly proclaimed that you would support repeal if most of the military supported it and you even challenged others to stand down from the issue if the military was against repeal. You lied. What does the Bible have to say about lying? How does the military feel about liars?
 
Last edited:
You lefties never get tired of playing the homophote, bigot or race card.........

Here's a suggestion. If you want to avoid being labelled as a homophobe, then perhaps you should avoid making remarks that reek of underlying hatred towards homosexuals - "We shall see my left wing friend.....I doubt if good morals will drop in that short period of time....It took many years for God to destroy Sodom....." Navy Pride

While you can say whatever you want (freedom of speech and all that), don't act all surprised when folks call you out for being homophobic when you say silly stuff like this. Newsflash - no supernatural entity is going to destroy cities nowadays because folks living there are homosexual. Having consensual sex with folks of the same gender is just as moral and acceptable as having consensual sex with folks of the opposite gender. And yes, despising homosexuals enough so that you don't want them to have the same rights and privileges as heterosexuals is being prejudicial, bigoted, and homophobic. There is nothing wrong with homosexuals serving their country in the military. They bleed just the same as anyone else, and they are quite capable of serving with distinction. Until you come to grips with that, and you can avoid such caustic attitudes towards these people - people who, I might add, are doing absolutely nothing immoral or wrong to begin with - then you can expect to be labelled as homophobic.

So either stop the hate speech, or relish in being labelled as a homophobe. Your choice.
 
I'm just going to start ignoring NavyPride threads, it's never a debate, just says something (usually inaccurate) without any attempt to back it up. It's a forum not a blog.
 
You people do realize that Navy's argument has nothing to do with the military or defense no?

It's merely a cover for his homophobia. Navy would have us kick out linguistic specialists who are gay. The same people we badly need to decode terrorist chatter to prevent new attacks.

The bad for defense argument is just hiding his dislike of gays who he has come out and argued are nothing more then animals who cannot control themselves despite the thousands who do so every day defending his freedom with their lives.
 
Last edited:
What he is describing is sociologically verified by evidence. Due to the media and other socializing factors, white people typically hold different views of black people, even if they aren't aware that they do. It has been shown empircally that white psychiatrists are more likely to diagnose black people with a mental illness and to prescribe injection medications which can be administered involuntarily. It has been shown empircally that white judges are more likely to sentence black people and give them harsher sentences. It has been shown empiraclly that white teachers treat black students differently than white students. It isn't "racism" so much as an unconcious response to a group that they have been psychologically primed to view as more threatening.



i'm sure you have plenty of links to this... :roll:


so you are just as bigoted as obama, thats wonderful.
 
where's the collins-lieberman stand alone?

The left’s been looking for a new hero. Tonight they latched onto one: Sen. Bernie Sanders.

The Vermont independent took progressive fury over President Obama’s tax-cut deal with Republicans to the floor of the Senate Friday, bringing the chamber to a standstill for eight hours with a filibuster-style speech that set the liberal Twitterverse ablaze.

Bernie Sanders's last stand - Shira Toeplitz - POLITICO.com

only 5 days of duck to go, and harry gives the house to the socialist

are you sure your leaders know what they're doing?
 
harry and house alliterate

where's the stand alone, parliamentarian pete?
 
We shall see my left wing friend.....I doubt if good morals will drop in that short period of time....It took many years for God to destroy Sodom.....

Funny to hear you talk about "Good morals" Navy.....it was just a few months back that you were bragging about committing adultry with a married woman while her huband was off serving our country. Are those the "Good Morals" that you are advancing?
 
Yeah that is what your surveery says that asks the wrong question but when I talk to guys in the fleet and ask them the right question not one has answered me to this point that they want to repeal DADT and several senior people said they would leave the Navy if DAFT is repealed.........

If there are really E-6s and up or anyone with more than 10 years in the service that would leave just because they would have to serve with gays, then they are making really stupid career decisions and the military doesn't need them. If they are so homophobic that they cannot properly deal with serving alongside someone that they may not like, then I'd say the military is way better off without that kind of horrible, bigoted leadership. There are plenty of other people to take their place in almost every job. And it has been my experience that those in undermanned jobs are the least likely to be homophobic.
 
We shall see my left wing friend.....I doubt if good morals will drop in that short period of time....It took many years for God to destroy Sodom.....

And Sodom had nothing to do with homosexuality, not according to the Bible. So I have no idea why you would bring it up.
 
And Sodom had nothing to do with homosexuality, not according to the Bible. .

But you have to admit that as far as role models are concerned, you really can't top Lot's offering up his two young daughters to the crowd for gang rape.

That old-timey morality can get pretty tricky at times, so it's important to remember what's what. Offering your underage daughters for gang rape isn't so bad, and their getting you drunk and having sex with you afterwards isn't so bad, but if you are evil enough to look back on your burning city as you are running away, it's pillar of salt time, baby!
 
I saw what was asked and the question of "Do you think DADT should be repealed was not asked.........

And it shouldn't have been asked. Would you ask the military "Do you want to go to war?" or would you ask them "What problems do you anticipate if we go to war, at this time, with this country, concerning your particular job/role?" The servicemembers are generally very knowledgeable in their own fields. They can tell you specific about what they have worked with and what has and hasn't worked in those areas.

Since most of the people, especially in the Marine Corps, admitted to not having worked/lived with someone who is gay, then how would they know how they would really react to working with one? And there is no proof that having openly gay servicemembers affects unit morale, discipline or cohesion, so they must be basing their answers off fears and assumptions.
 
And how on earth am I playing the "race card?" Homosexuals aren't a race.
Yes, exactly right. Now, please tell this to all your lib friends so they can quit falsely comparing DADT to Jim Crow.
 
i'm sure you have plenty of links to this... :roll:


so you are just as bigoted as obama, thats wonderful.

I'm bigoted against my own race? Yeeeeeeah. Good luck with that one Rev. You say some some pretty stupid stuff when it comes down to facts.

Racial Disparities Found in Pinpointing Mental Illness - washingtonpost.com
Is Schizophrenia Really a Black Disease? | Going Mental | Big Think
Racial inequality in the American criminal justice system - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
http://cte.rockhurst.edu/s/945/imag...NT PAPERS(Listed Alphabetically by P/rest.pdf
 
I was somehow under the impression that only the cheese stands alone.

then you haven't been watching the news

only 5 days remaining for the 111th, unless you think harry's gonna hold em over for christmas for this

good luck
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom