• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Fed aid in financial crisis went beyond U.S. banks to industry, foreign firms

Erod

DP Veteran
Joined
Aug 28, 2008
Messages
15,483
Reaction score
8,227
Location
North Texas
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Conservative
Fed aid in financial crisis went beyond U.S. banks to industry, foreign firms

But the extent of the lending to major banks - and the generous terms of some of those deals - heighten the political peril for a central bank that is already under the gun for a wide range of actions, including a recent decision to try to stimulate the economy by buying $600 billion in U.S. bonds.

"The American people are finally learning the incredible and jaw-dropping details of the Fed's multitrillion-dollar bailout of Wall Street and corporate America," said Sen. Bernard Sanders (I-Vt.), a longtime Fed critic whose provision in the Wall Street regulatory overhaul required the new disclosures. "Perhaps most surprising is the huge sum that went to bail out foreign private banks and corporations. As a result of this disclosure, other members of Congress and I will be taking a very extensive look at all aspects of how the Federal Reserve functions."

The Fed launched emergency programs totaling $3.3 trillion in aid, a figure reached by adding up the peak amount of lending in each program.

See, this stimulus money was never intended to create jobs. It was to bail out banks (and friends of the administration).

Change we can believe in. Puke.

I wonder how much went into Democratic campaign slush funds, too?
 
FT.com / US / Economy & Fed - European banks took big slice of Fed aid

Foreign banks were among the biggest beneficiaries of the $3,300bn in emergency credit provided by the Federal Reserve during the crisis, according to new data on the extraordinary efforts of the US authorities to save the global financial system.

Were we told that the stimulus was to bailout foreign banks like this.

These foreign banks are bailed out, and it was all charged to our already maxed-out credit card? We printed money for this?
 
The fraud and lies from the "Trifecta of Doom" Obama, Pelosi, Reid, runs very deep and they will look you in the eye and lie to you about it even in the knowledge that you know they are lying.

They are pathological liars and one day the amount of money that went out to friends of Legislators and the percentage that came back either as direct corruption or hidden as campaign contributions might come out.

On top of that: Some of the money went for such items as, Railroad Retirement Board.

Social Security Administration: 13 billion spent upgrading computers and one time payments. Not stimulating as there is no direct impact to job creation.

Department of Labor: 18 billion spent on providing education and worker training to workers and "easing the burden of the recession" by assisting and expanding access to health care.

Department of Justice: 1 billion spent on providing training, equipment.

Department of Education which has spent 14 Billion on state grants, school modernization, Pell grant funding and possibly preserving education jobs in states where funding is critical.

To name a few areas where there was either very little but mostly not direct stimulus connection.

$3 billion was allotted for rebates for Cash for Clunkers and NO net jobs were created and the sales only caused a shot term blip in sales that then fell off to below what they would otherwise have been so there was no net increase in car sales because of the program that cost $24,000 per car to give and average of $4.000 per car sold and the most sold were Toyota.

The Stimulus like like Obama Care was and is a fraud, and not designed to do what we were told it would do.
 
This truly is the biggest story of the year, yet it will get little if any coverage. In fact, this is not "news" because this information could have been released anytime over the last year, but right after the elections, they get this out there so it can die in time for the next go-round. Instead, we here about DADT, wikileaks, and Bristol Palin. Distractions, distractions, distractions.

Obama said the stimulus to help homeowners and create jobs. He said during his campaign that he would go after "big business" and those "responsible for the financial crisis". Then what does he do? He bails out the banks here and abroad, General Electric, and all the big wigs and unions he owes favors to.

And yet, his sheep just sit quietly and nod.
 
Last edited:
wait til mom and pop hear about this

foreign banks---barclays, ubs, dexia, bank of scotland, societe generale, rbs, dresdner, bayerische landebank---among the "biggest beneficiaries of THREE POINT THREE TRILLION dollars in united states taxpayer backed loans

another newly disclosed recipient of 16B of "help" was ge, parent of msnbc

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/12/01/AR2010120106870.html

and an unnamed official from the imf, according to cnbc, is eager to DO MORE

CNBC: US Ready to Back Bigger EU Stability Fund

meanwhile, just look what's going on (in only the last week) in europe---is this a SOUND INVESTMENT?

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/12/01/business/global/01bonds.nervouseuro

EU Bailout News: Ireland's Ripples Spread Globally - WSJ.com

Euro, Stocks, Spanish Bonds Fall on Concern European Debt Crisis to Spread - Bloomberg

Ireland Gets $113 Billion Bailout as EU Ministers Seek to Halt Debt Crisis - Bloomberg

Thousands protest against Irish bailout | World news | guardian.co.uk

Ireland's Relief Proves Fleeting as `Day of Reckoning' Nears: Euro Credit - Bloomberg

My Way News - Portugal, Spain hit by investor fears over debt

CNBC: In Bailouts, Spain Will Be the Biggie

My Way News - Irish bond yields hit euro-era high, banks sink

EU rescue costs start to threaten Germany itself - Telegraph

Euro-Zone Crisis News: Fears of Domino Effect Spread Across Europe - WSJ.com

the fed has for a year and a half worked its butt off to keep these embarrassing details from the taxpaying public which will ultimately be held responsible

Fed Seeks Delay of Bank Data Release While Considering Appeal - Bloomberg

now we know why

just YESTERDAY the supreme court criticized the white house's overuse of foia

High court questions broad use of FOIA exemption - Forbes.com

despite the hopey-changey crap we all had crammed down our throats during a year of charismatic campaigning, transparency to this white house, it appears, does not extend beyond WIKILEAKS

remember, geithner's fed instructed aig to keep the terms of its bailout secret from the sec, surely for similar reasons

and don't forget obama's SECRET deal with phrma

Geithner's New York Fed Pushed AIG To Keep Sweetheart Deals Secret (READ THE AIG EMAILS)

Internal Memo Confirms Big Giveaways In White House Deal With Big Pharma

sadly, the secrecy continues

Fed Withholds Collateral Data for $885 Billion in Financial-Crisis Loans - Bloomberg

of course, bernanke couldn't keep quiet his decision to pump another 600B of qe last month, more taxpayer secured purchases of crap

Fed to Buy $600 Billion of Treasurys - WSJ.com

it was bernanke's gambit which killed obama's g20 three days later, paving the perplexed way for the nonplussed president's RODNEY DANGERFIELD MOMENT

NationalJournal.com - America?s Rodney Dangerfield Moment - Friday, November 12, 2010

chickens are roosting, progressives

party on, proudly
 
Last edited:
Fed aid in financial crisis went beyond U.S. banks to industry, foreign firms



See, this stimulus money was never intended to create jobs. It was to bail out banks (and friends of the administration).

Change we can believe in. Puke.

I wonder how much went into Democratic campaign slush funds, too?

It might have helped had you read the articles you posted because neither of them had anything to do with the Obama Administration or the actual stimulus package that Congress passed in Feburary 2009. Instead they discussed financial measures that the Federal Reserve began to take all the way back in the summer of 2007 to help stabilize the economy.

Only an idiot would attack either Presidents Bush or Obama for actions taken by an almost completely institution like the Federal Reserve.
 
It might have helped had you read the articles you posted because neither of them had anything to do with the Obama Administration or the actual stimulus package that Congress passed in Feburary 2009. Instead they discussed financial measures that the Federal Reserve began to take all the way back in the summer of 2007 to help stabilize the economy.

Only an idiot would attack either Presidents Bush or Obama for actions taken by an almost completely institution like the Federal Reserve.

LOL, whatever. Then why did Obama sell it like he did?
 
LOL, whatever. Then why did Obama sell it like he did?

For the very same reason Bush sold it. Here is the difference between you and me - I blame everybody, not just the people with either a D or an R after their name.
 
The most disturbing part of all this economic mess is that people are more interested in pointing fingers at one another than actually solving the problem
 
what we learned today:

Tax Breaks for Bailout Recipients Spark Debate - WSJ.com

A series of tax relief measures is saving companies bailed out by the government billions of dollars at a time when concern over tax revenues has risen.

Although the Treasury Department first provided the tax guidance in the fall of 2008, the magnitude of the tax savings has become clearer in the past year. The tax relief drew new scrutiny last month after Wall Street bankers touted it to investors in the initial public offering of General Motors Corp.

The tax breaks, already known to apply at GM and Citigroup Inc., also are helping results at another company rescued by Uncle Sam, American International Group Inc., according to tax experts and people familiar with the companies.

The Treasury gave the same treatment to mortgage agencies Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, but their ability to save taxes as a result is less certain, the same people said.

The tax treatment allows companies whose ownership changes to keep the right to use past losses and other deductions to offset future profits for as long as 20 years. Ordinarily, companies' ability to use such tax assets is curtailed when they are acquired, under a 1986 law aimed at curbing "trafficking" acquisitions arranged to capture tax shelters.

would it be fair to call such incentives, "tax cuts for the rich?"

"corporate welfare?"

you can decide as well as i

either way, it certainly appears this admin plays favorites

and the pets are pretty upscale

aig---we've already seen geithner's fed instruct the tawdry too big to keep SECRETS from the sec

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/01/07/geithners-new-york-fed-to_n_414449.html

geithner and dead dodd also are responsible for grandfathering those obscene aig bonuses, remember?

http://articles.latimes.com/2009/mar/19/business/fi-dodd19

f & f---the home lenders, responsible for some 70% of american mortgages, more than any institutions responsible for bringing us all precisely here, are, you recall, EXEMPT from barry obama's WALL STREET REGULATORY REFORM, the perplexed president's second most substantial legislative accomplishment

Wall Street Reform: A Summary of What's In the Bill - Political Hotsheet - CBS News

meanwhile, ON THE STREEET the results ARE IN---9.8% unemployment and heading the WRONG WAY

this administration has failed, is failing

sorry
 
Last edited:
LOL, whatever. Then why did Obama sell it like he did?
I'm not talking about the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. If you want to talk about that, then by all means start another thread.

Again, had you actually taken a few minutes to read the articles you posted it would be crystal clear that both were discussing Federal Reserve stimulus policies, most of which occurred before President Obama took office. Even after he took office he would have had nothing to do with the decision-making process because the Federal Reserve is an independent institution.
 
while it is true that the fed is SUPPOSED to be independent, oafish obama has managed even to begin to screw that up

ie, he's taking an awful lot of HEAT

At issue is a U.S.-led proposal to prohibit currency manipulation of the kind that U.S. officials say China uses to give its exports an unfair advantage over American-made products.

Doesn’t it “look hypocritical,” Obama was asked at the news conference, to make that demand after the United States last week announced a $600 billion plan to boost U.S. economic growth that will have the effect of driving down the value of the dollar?

First Obama distanced himself from the decision, saying the Fed “doesn’t take orders from the White House,” then he defended it. But coming only hours after he had conceded on CBS’s “60 Minutes” that he is sometimes at a loss about what to do on the economy, the dispute put a damper on a trip that was supposed to emphasize that Obama’s electoral losses didn’t diminish his stature as the leader of the world’s most powerful economy.

And Germany, for decades a close U.S. ally in persuading other nations to control budget deficits, effectively called U.S. officials hypocrites for neglecting bank regulation and for failing for years to curb runaway trade and budget deficits. The Fed’s decision last week to start buying Treasury bonds to help stimulate the sluggish U.S. economy, something likely to lower the value of the dollar and make it tougher for Germany’s export-oriented economy, brought that criticism out into the open.

Obama, who normally avoids discussing the informal and close coordination between the Fed and the Treasury Department, was forced to spring to the Fed’s defense Monday. “I will say that the Fed's mandate, my mandate, is to grow our economy. And that's not just good for the United States, that's good for the world as a whole."

Barack Obama can?t escape economic debate - John Maggs - POLITICO.com
 
Back
Top Bottom