- Joined
- Feb 6, 2007
- Messages
- 7,025
- Reaction score
- 2,896
- Location
- Deep in the Heart of Texas
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
This is obviously a case of entrapment. This freedom fighter was set up.
We need Homeland Security to set up checkpoints at every Christmas tree lighting ceremony in America to prevent future attacks that are exactly the same. They'll need to search the vehicles of every person in attendance, and possibly check the inside of their assholes for explosives as well. Sure, the next terrorist could just try some OTHER tactic somewhere ELSE, but at least there won't be any more terrorists who try to set off car bombs at Christmas tree lighting ceremonies. Sure, it will cost a huge amount of money for practically no security benefit, but we can't put a price on our lives. Amirite? :mrgreen:
This is obviously a case of entrapment. This freedom fighter was set up.
A Somali-born teenager attempting to detonate what he believed was a car bomb at a packed Christmas tree-lighting ceremony in downtown Portland, Ore., was arrested by the authorities on Friday night. They had spent nearly six months tracking him and setting up a sting operation, officials in Oregon said.
The bomb, which was in a van parked off Pioneer Courthouse Square, was a fake — planted by F.B.I. agents as part of the elaborate sting — but “the threat was very real,” said Arthur Balizan, the F.B.I.’s special agent in charge in Oregon. An estimated 10,000 people were at the ceremony on Friday night, the Portland police said.
Mr. Balizan identified the suspect as Mohamed Osman Mohamud, 19, a naturalized United States citizen. He graduated from Westview High School in Beaverton, Ore., a Portland suburb, and was a sophomore engineering student at Oregon State University in Corvallis, authorities said.
Read more: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/28/us/28portland.html?_r=1
If it didn't work in this one instance, it obviously can't be working anywhere else.
LOGIC.
Just what I figured.
You haven't really changed. You just think you're being witty.
I think we need a whole new approach but no idea what.
This kid said he'd been thinking about it since he was 15. So something made him hate Americans before that.
I think we need a whole new approach but no idea what.
This kid said he'd been thinking about it since he was 15. So something made him hate Americans before that.
We need to kill more extremist Muslims.
Bascially, cure the disease, vice curing the symptoms.
I thought Obama was supposed assuage the concerns of such morons? I recall something along those lines... don't others?
Seems the message isn't getting through.
I'm sure they feel the same way about us.
How's that been working out for them? :lol:
We need to kill more extremist Muslims.
Bascially, cure the disease, vice curing the symptoms.
We need to kill more extremist Muslims.
Bascially, cure the disease, vice curing the symptoms.
Religious extremism is a symptom. They aren't born extremist. There are bred and taught to hate and to identify phantom enemies to explain away their region's failures. Islam, as an organizing tool, had failed in the twentieth century. Since the era of independence (post WWII), government change in this region has been through militay coup and political strong arming. Only the elite form political parties and only they have social justice. As economic systems become more and more about the few, people without any avenue of approach to peacefully change things turn to the one thing they have spent 1400 years looking towards to fix all things. Over time, the radical cry to turn towards Islam has turned into mass extremism even as it proved to fail as well. Eventually, everything imaginable has been used to justify their rage and hatreds towards the West. And when that merely produces everything negative about religion...
Middle Eastern failure is the disease.
There is an old saying.... "- You can tell when a religion is in crisis when it begins to develop more rules to reject society and less compassion towards sinners." Is there any wonder why the most successful and prosperous Muslims reside in Western countries? Why the freeest live outside the Middle East? Why the further away religion got from this region, the healthier it got and so did the civilizations? Is the great religion of Islam really so threatened by a Western author's book or a cartoonist's square that murder for God becomes the answer? How fragile must God be that another's lack of faith will insult or shatter a religion. And how weak must Allah be that he needs human beings to be his self-appointed executioners.
The disease is clear. Fix the Middle East and the symptoms begin to dissapear. But it may be too late for the Middle East and all who live in it.
But killing more extremist Muslims is only curing the symptoms. The reason why extremist Muslims are militant is because many of them are poor and uneducated and have little way to improve their lot in life. So if you want to cure the disease, the best thing to do is to help Muslim areas promote an economic base and provide modern education rather than let them be ingrained by zealous religious leaders to be militant extremists.
I'm sure they feel the same way about us.
That's no ****in' excuse! Gimme a break!!!!!!
People weren't born to be Nazis and Communists, either.
Simply improving the standard of living in the ME isn't going to make Islamic extremism go away. Islamic extremism has been around for fourteen-hundred-years; long before there was a United States.
That's no ****in' excuse! Gimme a break!!!!!!
That may be true. However, killing them all won't fix anything either.
Excatly. What made them? There own failed and failing civilizations. Germany is far more healther today and this means that extremist organizations like the Nazi Party are without a means to arm itself.
This is a copout. Islamic exremism has come in waves and this current wave is by far the most dangerous,most wide spread, and most confused of any wave. Anyway, Islamic extremism will be just as present in life as Christian extremism is. Nobody has ever argued that this "War on Terror" was ever going to vanquish religious extremism. It is a false argument for either side to have.
The goal has always been to make it more manageable. Christian radicals in the U.S. are not quick to ruin their lives by breaking laws and murdering their fellow American because they live in a society where they are largely happy, represented, and have avenues of complaint that matter. Our extremists generally are content organizing amongst themselves into cults and at the most committing mass suicide through flavored sugar water. The American culture and society has given every single individual in it a way to improve upon his life. With absolutely no avenue to rely on except Islam, radicals are more quick to commit suicide in a blast if it will mean that his after life is an improvement. There is a reason that the vast majority of all suicide bombers are ueducated and full of personal family failure. Even our educated Islamic terrorists on high know this, which is why it is never them that wears the vest. Why do you think they recruit from the worst neighborhoods in the Middle East? Hell, in recent years with all of Islam looking towards Iraq's example, they have even turned towards Africa for recruits.
This is historical in terms of civilizational disasters. As society becomes more repressed and oppressed, religious people will turn towards God more and more. And as religion becomes more internally disruptive and violent, society becomes more and more abusive and suicidal. These go hand in hand. The Middle East is on a suicide path. And as it gets worse, the more deadlier it will be for our people. This is the disease. Fixing it has always been a generational effort and never the quick in and out people expected from Iraq and Afghanistan.
1) Extremists must die. They are too far gone and irredeemable.
2) Radicals must be given time to embrace the power and security of a the vote.
3) Current governments must be held absolutely accountable to their people by stronger nations.
It is our problem because as 9/11 proved, assassinating local leaders and slaughtering fellow Muslims is no longer good enough. The exportation of Islamic terror into Western nations is unacceptable and therefore we must force this change (since they will not). After all, waiting around and just sniping the never ending stream of religious terrorists is not exactly safe guarding our people.
You are right. It is absolutely no excuse.
But the fact that Islamic radicalism and extremism has exponentially grown as every Arab plan for prosperity failed in the 20th century is more than one can ignore. Everybody knows that ignorance amongst religious circles breeds more ignorance. This is true in any culture. We are witnessing the complete failure of the once great Islamic civilization and every radical in the region is looking for an excuse to blame anybody but themselves and their own culture. There is no coincidence that even in the religious Middle East ignorance has been breeding even more ignorance. And with this region being the most religiously focused on earth, failure here is very very bad.
A religion in crisis will always produce God's self-appointed executioners. The question then becomes, "What has caused Islam to fail in this region?" The answer here is that in a globalized Western world of free expression, creativity, individual freedom, and capitalism, Islam, as a governing tool, cannot succeed. It is as much a socialist religion as Christianity is. The difference is that Christianity doesn't govern. In the end, Islam is failing in the Middle East because the West exists and Islam's governance cannot compete. But since Islam's creator declared Islam as governance...what hope can we have for the Middle East and the rest of the world as it continues to fail?
The problem is the Islamic Middle East, not the extremist in a cave. Israelis is not governed through Islam. Turkey chose a long time ago to separate Islam for governance. Is it really supposed to be a mere coincidence that these two are the only prosperous and forward leaning governments in the region with the least amount of corruption? Would Turkey be a nation that seeks inclusion in the EU today had it not made the relgious separation 85 years ago? Or would it be like the rest, torn between loyalty to God and creating a modern prosperous society in the 21st century?
Again, that's no excuse. Nor, was it accepted as an excuse when we defeated the Nazis and the Communists.
Poverty in the ME is older than Islam, itself. The whatever standard of living that exist in the ME, is of their own doing.