• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Obama's Democrats in disarray over expiring tax cuts

Nah, but we all tell ourselves what we would like....Oh, my profession doesn't lend to drug use like yours does...


j-mac

Yes, you do, sadly. And drugs are bad OK . . .

:coffepap
 
What? You won't take someone's word? Ofcourse you do.....It happens to be Keith Olberman's, or his nephew Rachel Maddow's but you do.

j-mac

And Obama who can do no wrong in Boo's eyes
 
And Obama who can do no wrong in Boo's eyes

As I have criticised him for his efforts in Afghanistan, you would be mistaken as well. But don't let me ruin a good case of denial. :coffeepap
 
afghanistan is a disaster

biden moved the DROP DEAD DATE for withdrawal to 2014

The Page by Mark Halperin | Biden: 2014 “Drop Dead Date”

more americans have been killed over there since obama took over than 01 to 08 combined, 55 in november

iCasualties | Operation Enduring Freedom | Afghanistan

for what?

wapo's watergate wonderboy wrote it's all about politics (and incompetence) in his characteristic voice of judgement, OBAMA'S WARS

Bob Woodward book details Obama battles with advisers over exit plan for Afghan war

tragic
 
Last edited:
As I have criticised him for his efforts in Afghanistan, you would be mistaken as well. But don't let me ruin a good case of denial. :coffeepap

You seldom find fault and a huge majority of the time praise him and defend him
 
You seldom find fault and a huge majority of the time praise him and defend him

So, I like him better than I did Bush, largely because he is better than Bush. But it all boils down to his policies and efforts. Those I disagree with, I state clearly that I disagee with them. I know this is evil and I don't know how I could behave such in such a manner, but hell, that's how I roll.

:coffeepap
 
So, I like him better than I did Bush, largely because he is better than Bush. But it all boils down to his policies and efforts. Those I disagree with, I state clearly that I disagee with them. I know this is evil and I don't know how I could behave such in such a manner, but hell, that's how I roll.

:coffeepap

You are an Obama apologist and good liberal who want to destroy this country and its economic system.

What will be interesting is will democrats vote to pass this or will they hurt all of America to try and get more money from the rich so they can spend more.
 
You are an Obama apologist and good liberal who want to destroy this country and its economic system.

What will be interesting is will democrats vote to pass this or will they hurt all of America to try and get more money from the rich so they can spend more.

Please, wild hyperbolic exaggeration is never a good argument. :coffeepap
 
Please, wild hyperbolic exaggeration is never a good argument. :coffeepap

But it does make for entertaining reading.

480-picture-of-coffee-refill-by-kenny-adams.jpg
 
No its not you just won't believe anything negative about the dems or Obama

Again, demonstratively false. That's why your statement is wild hyperbolic exaggeration. :coffeepap
 
Again, demonstratively false. That's why your statement is wild hyperbolic exaggeration. :coffeepap

It is not false. The proof is you are not being specific but claiming exaggeration
 
It is not false. The proof is you are not being specific but claiming exaggeration

I gave you one example. How many do you need? I think Rangle should he fired. I think democrats cave too readily. I think both parties are corrupt. I like divided government over one party holding all the power. I can go on, but would it really make any difference to someone so inclined to such wild hyperbolic exaggeration as you have stated? :coffeepap
 
No its not you just won't believe anything negative about the dems or Obama

Most Americans voted for Republicans in the last election. The same majority of Americans who voted Republican, including me, now oppose the Republicans on the tax cuts for the rich issue.
 
I gave you one example. How many do you need? I think Rangle should he fired. I think democrats cave too readily. I think both parties are corrupt. I like divided government over one party holding all the power. I can go on, but would it really make any difference to someone so inclined to such wild hyperbolic exaggeration as you have stated? :coffeepap
Democrats don't cave. The problem up to now has been democrats disagreements among themselves. GOP was not able to stop any thing.

Rangle may get that yet since he is in trouble again.

Before It's News
 
Most Americans voted for Republicans in the last election. The same majority of Americans who voted Republican, including me, now oppose the Republicans on the tax cuts for the rich issue.

I do not believe that. So people want tax cuts for the rich to expire leaving that much less money for hiring people. So you are saying people want unemployment to continue
 
Democrats don't cave. The problem up to now has been democrats disagreements among themselves. GOP was not able to stop any thing.

Rangle may get that yet since he is in trouble again.

Before It's News

Yes, they do have a problem agreeing, another fault that is less prevelent with republicans. But they also cave.

And I all for Rangle being fired.

But the point is, you're wild hyperbolic exaggerated statement is simply false.
 
Yes, they do have a problem agreeing, another fault that is less prevelent with republicans. But they also cave.

And I all for Rangle being fired.

But the point is, you're wild hyperbolic exaggerated statement is simply false.

What is false be specific
 
Back
Top Bottom