First of all, it isn't "my" party, but it is the party closer to my ideology. Second, it is the Obama economic policy that the people rejected in 2010. You seem to think because some perceive that things are getting better the facts simply don't support that contention and if the economy is getting better the question is at what cost? This President is the most leftwing President in U.S. history spending more money to grow the govt. than any other President in U.S. history. It is the direction and cost of this economic policy that is turning people off. Most people are smart enough to understand that you cannot spend the kind of money Obama has spent and get the results he has gotten then claim things are better and we have really turned the corner. All that spending did was generate 4 million more unemployed and added 3 trillion to the debt. Wouldn't you have expected less employment today? If not why spend all that money? Now the Democrats want to continue that economic policy, extended unemployment benefits well beyond two years and ignore the will of the people which is "stop the spending."
Tell me what economic results justify what Obama has done in the past two years? You think things are getting better? Where? Why extend unemployment benefits? Why implement Obamacare? Why bailout unions? Tell me what Obama has done that has made anything better? The answer is the reason that he lost in historic proportions on Nov. 2
first of all, yes, its your party, the party whose policies you support, own up to it ....second, i believe i'm spot on, people want recovery, and they want it NOW....sad fact of life is you don't get out of mess in 2yrs when the mess was over 5 years in the making, sorry, you don't. why implement obamacare? because by god this is America, and every citizen deserves basic healthcare, whether they be rich, or poor.
Bailing out unions? good grief , get a damn clue already, i've already explained this to you, you were comfy just letting the economy totally collapse because it would have served your purposes, to have an all republican government, never mind all the people, OTHER THAN THOSE 'UNION' JOBS you like to cry about, who would have been out of work because those companys, members of the 'big three' went belly up. UNION JOBS would not have been the only jobs lost, a fact you can't, don't, don't want to, grasp. If it hurt the democrats, hurt the unions, then apparently everyone else be damned who would have been hurt by the fallout.
extended unemployment benefits? YOU YOURSELF LIKE TO BANG THE DRUM ABOUT HOW MANY 'MILLIONS' OF PEOPLE ARE UNEMPLOYED, but claim that, apparently, all these unemployed people are lazy bums, wanting to live off the government teat, and are all happy servants of the democratic party. so explain something to me....you don't see any need for unemployment benefits for these people? how do you expect them to eat? pay their rent? have gas money to look for a job? what do you expect these people to do? i've read some of your posts that say perhaps they need to move...hey genius, where are they supposed to get the money to move on?