• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

TSA ejects Oceanside man from airport for refusing security check

maybe he does?

maybe obama cares about losing?

LOL!

and the facts are in your face---"runs afoul of privacy and civil rights," house homeland security

that's losing, mr serling

no maybe
 
Last edited:
The Prof said:
maybe he does?

maybe obama cares about losing?

LOL!

and the facts are in your face---"runs afoul of privacy and civil rights," house homeland security

that's losing, mr serling

no maybe
Click to expand...

You won't mind if I disagree, will ya? :coffeepap
 
what self respecter could possibly care, you're less significant than a flea

fact is the white house is getting killed on this

ask abc, the aclu and house homeland security

millions of americans listen to THEM
 
Boo Radley said:
No, I don;t always agree with the ACLU, just believe they serve a necessary function. But this is again the difference between us. You look at what people "SAY" while I look at what something actually IS.
Click to expand...

Let me tell you something. When even communist orgs like the ACLU call it "groping", IT IS! End of story.
 
This debate still rages?

The TSA should not confine people nor should they feel up the junk. Honestly I feel it should be less invasive.
 
Last edited:
American said:
Let me tell you something. When even communist orgs like the ACLU call it "groping", IT IS! End of story.
Click to expand...

No, it isn't. Words have actual definitions and meanings. It isn't, and that is the end of the story. ;)
 
Boo Radley said:
No, it isn't. Words have actual definitions and meanings. It isn't, and that is the end of the story. ;)
Click to expand...

And the ACLU has plenty of lawyers.
 
American said:
And the ACLU has plenty of lawyers.
Click to expand...

Yes they do. But that doesn't amke them right. And those many lawyers have even lost from time to time. :coffeepap
 
right or wrong, the obamites are getting killed

aclu---GROPING

house homeland security---runs afoul of privacy and civil liberties

abc---gross

LOL!
 
j-mac said:
So stick to your guns, even when faced with the opposite being said by an organization that you have long agreed with. Everybody is wrong but you eh? is that it?


j-mac
Click to expand...
I see what you mean now. :roll:
 
American said:
I see what you mean now. :roll:
Click to expand...

Why would anyone think facts are not facts just because someone disagrees with you? I have never understood your sides dependence on what people SAY. Facts mean more than claims. Sorry.
 
because right and wrong are subjective, silly, other people's sentiments matter as much as narcissistic yours

winning and losing, however, are BOTTOM LINE

and the white house is getting killed

aclu---GROPING

house homeland security---PRIVACY and CIVIL LIBERTIES

abc---getchur hands outta my underwear, you creep!

LOL!

and CHANGE your GLOVES!
 
What was that about Hillary Clinton refraining from such searches? If that is true, then what can we derive from it?
 
Wake said:
What was that about Hillary Clinton refraining from such searches? If that is true, then what can we derive from it?
Click to expand...

Nothing. No one has to have a search.
 
I am starting to realize that even liberal sources are against such policies. Perhaps this means something?
 
Boo Radley said:
Nothing. No one has to have a search.
Click to expand...

Though they are told they cannot leave should they refuse and are also threatened with fines and lawsuits. Quite understandable, I'd imagine.
 
The Prof said:
because right and wrong are subjective, silly, other people's sentiments matter as much as narcissistic yours

winning and losing, however, are BOTTOM LINE

and the white house is getting killed

aclu---GROPING

house homeland security---PRIVACY and CIVIL LIBERTIES

abc---getchur hands outta my underwear, you creep!

LOL!

and CHANGE your GLOVES!
Click to expand...

Opinions are subjective. True. But definitions are objective. The dennotative definition of a word carries weight. It is not as open to interpretation as you suggest. Words actually have rather objective meanings. That is why I posted the definitions.
 
Boo Radley said:
Words have actual definitions and meanings.
Click to expand...

they sure do, words like GROPING, words like RUNNING AFOUL

and that is the end of the story
Click to expand...

hardly

another blanket claim outside your purview

we are as entitled to click and submit as anyone

thus story continues

your turn

and HURRY!
 
If you are to play around with the definition of "groping," then I can use your logic to totally take away all words used in negative liberal slander/discussion.

Trade?
 
Wake said:
Though they are told they cannot leave should they refuse and are also threatened with fines and lawsuits. Quite understandable, I'd imagine.
Click to expand...

Sounds like the fine would be related to more than just saying no:

TSA officers have even threatened to fine passengers who protest the new pat-downs. The agency can fine passengers up to $10,000 for behaving in a manner that is so uncooperative and disruptive that it physically interferes with the screening process, according to the agency.

Confused and abused by the TSA

So we'll see how this plays out. But let me ask you. If someone was transporting something, and refused to be search, are you OK with them leaving to try elsewhere?

And what do you make of most people being OK with this?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom