• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

TSA ejects Oceanside man from airport for refusing security check

Gill said:
Proper is in the eye of the person being fondled. Legal is in the eye of the D.A.
Click to expand...

In this case, legal is proper. I wouldn't look at the world too subjectively. Some actually said 9/11 was justified. I can possibly see accepting that subjective view as valid. The point of bring that up is to say that any wild view can't be accepted by the majority just because they hold it. We have to make reasonable judgments knowing some fringe will always disagree. So, we look at what something really is and not just how a few individuals choose to look at it.
 
Harshaw said:
Are you blind? What's "patted my genitals"?

The lengths to which you're going to defend this are staggering.
Click to expand...

Patting the area. Like in a normal pat down down, done regularly by police officers. She mentions nothing that would fit the definition of copping a feel or fondling.
 
Laila said:
Your obsession with the word fondled is showing.

I did not mention fondle. She did have her breasts touched and her vagina was patted. :roll:

I would hardly call it appropriate touching.
Click to expand...

Again, what you describe is the definition of the word fondle whether you use it or not. ANd to be an offense, it must be fondling or coping a feel, which are essentially the same thing.
 
Boo Radley said:
Patting the area. Like in a normal pat down down, done regularly by police officers. She mentions nothing that would fit the definition of copping a feel or fondling.
Click to expand...

Shifty_Eyes_Emoticon_by_Canaan1.gif

Police officers regularly pat your vagina or penis? Really?

Sucks to be American.
 
Last edited:
Boo Radley said:
Patting the area. Like in a normal pat down down, done regularly by police officers. She mentions nothing that would fit the definition of copping a feel or fondling.
Click to expand...

Under the underwear?

I think if you had any allies in this thread, they've all abandoned you as of now. :roll:

It is truly astonishing what you'll do to convince yourself that a liberal administration can do nothing wrong.

Meanwhile, righteous rage about someone having their phone line tapped without even knowing it, and only when talking to someone overseas who's known to be a terrorist. Yeah, that's beyond the pale and grabbing someone's genitals under their underwear is just good sense.
 
Boo Radley said:
In this case, legal is proper. I wouldn't look at the world too subjectively. Some actually said 9/11 was justified. I can possibly see accepting that subjective view as valid. The point of bring that up is to say that any wild view can't be accepted by the majority just because they hold it. We have to make reasonable judgments knowing some fringe will always disagree. So, we look at what something really is and not just how a few individuals choose to look at it.
Click to expand...

Feel free to continue with your hypocrisy. If a president with a R behind his name was in charge, you would be screaming for his head.

We'll see if this farce by TSA makes it past Christmas. I seriously doubt it will.
 
Harshaw said:
It is truly astonishing what you'll do to convince yourself that a liberal administration can do nothing wrong.
Click to expand...

I wonder if this passed under the Bush administration whether it would have had the same response. :shrug:
 
Since two of you got it wrong, let me repost the quote:

. . . then put her hands up on outside of slacks, and patted my genitals.”
Click to expand...
 
Gill said:
Feel free to continue with your hypocrisy. If a president with a R behind his name was in charge, you would be screaming for his head.

We'll see if this farce by TSA makes it past Christmas. I seriously doubt it will.
Click to expand...

No, I wouldn't. This is merely your effort to avoid dealing with the facts. Shameful on your part.
 
Boo Radley said:
Since two of you got it wrong, let me repost the quote:

. . . then put her hands up on outside of slacks, and patted my genitals.”
Click to expand...

Strong editing
Moroney explains “Her gloved hands touched my breasts...went between them. Then she went into the top of my slacks, inserted her hands between my underwear and my skin... then put her hands up on outside of slacks, and patted my genitals.”
Click to expand...

You know what is between underwear? Yeah .... Just saying :shrug:
 
Last edited:
Laila said:
I wonder if this passed under the Bush administration whether it would have had the same response. :shrug:
Click to expand...

He'd be screaming about it. Of this, there is no question, at all.
 
Boo Radley said:
No, I wouldn't. This is merely your effort to avoid dealing with the facts. Shameful on your part.
Click to expand...

You're the only one that should be ashamed... for hypocrisy and for dishonest quoting.
 
Laila said:
Strong editing


You know what is between underwear? Yeah .... Just saying :shrug:
Click to expand...

No, at the top of the rim and not her vigina. She did not touch near the genitals until she went outside of the slacks. Her hands, two, both, outside of her slacks, and then the patting of the genital region.
 
Boo Radley said:
No, at the top of the rim and not her vigina. She did not touch near the genitals until she went outside of the slacks. Her hands, two, both, outside of her slacks, and then the patting of the genital region.
Click to expand...

I think we're done here.
 
Harshaw said:
He'd be screaming about it. Of this, there is no question, at all.
Click to expand...

So now when someone refuses to acquiesce to your opinion, you attack their politics? How absurd. Please explain what President Obama has to do with body scanners and pat downs. Or is it just because he occupies the Oval Office? Good God.

I think we're done here.
Click to expand...

This horse died three pages ago.
 
Boo Radley said:
No, at the top of the rim and not her vigina. She did not touch near the genitals until she went outside of the slacks. Her hands, two, both, outside of her slacks, and then the patting of the genital region.
Click to expand...




A WOMAN is suing over an incident where airport staff allegedly pulled down her top and joked about her breasts in public view.
Click to expand...


Swift says they told her she was singled out because she was wearing a skirt. She says the search earlier this month was very rough and left her in tears.

"The female officer ran her hand up the inside of my leg to my groin and she did it so hard and so rough she lifted me off my heels," she says. "I think I yelped. I was in pain for about an hour afterwards. It just felt excessive and unnecessary."
Click to expand...


"She put her full hand on my breast and said, 'What is this?'. And I said, 'It's my prosthesis because I've had breast cancer.' And she said, 'Well, you'll need to show me that'."
Click to expand...

I guess these women should just relax and enjoy it eh ???
 
MaggieD said:
So now when someone refuses to acquiesce to your opinion, you attack their politics? How absurd. Please explain what President Obama has to do with body scanners and pat downs. Or is it just because he occupies the Oval Office? Good God.
Click to expand...

It's a policy of his administration, put in place by his appointee. I would think that was obvious, but apparently not.

Not that Boo would make any distinctions had this been put into place 3 years ago.
 
Gill said:
I guess these women should just relax and enjoy it eh ???
Click to expand...

LENO: They touch your genitals at the airport…which is crazy, considering you don’t have the right to touch your own genitals at the airport.

You go to the airport, touch your genitals, and see what happens!

These new patdown procedures are causing trouble between couples. I heard one woman say to her husband: ‘How come you don’t touch me like that anymore?’
Click to expand...

....................................
 
MaggieD said:
So now when someone refuses to acquiesce to your opinion, you attack their politics? How absurd. Please explain what President Obama has to do with body scanners and pat downs. Or is it just because he occupies the Oval Office? Good God.



This horse died three pages ago.
Click to expand...

No, Boo's hypocrisy is what's being attacked.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom