• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Mystery Missile Launch Seen off Calif. Coast

Okay I need a crystal ball. I got it wrong, Richard C. Hogland is not going to be the conspiracy nut tonight.

First Hour: Whitley Strieber and Charles R. Smith comment on a mysterious missile launch in Los Angeles.

I still say it's no big deal. KCAL-9 News showed another video this evening taken at almost the same time and while it was not an exact match it was so close as to put this story to bed.

Chalk it up to optical illusion.
 
Ok. First off the missile came from the ocean (submarine). The only countries with the capabilities to launch an ICBM from submarines are USA, Russia, China, France, Britain. So assuming France isn't planning on destroying us any time soon. I would bet my ridiculous government salary that it was in fact the US who launched this and its secret enough that they are denying they had nothing to do with it. The fact that not one of the military branches, NORAD, or NASA claim they have NO IDEA what it was kinda leads one to speculate. Or what about the missile facility/range at Barking Sands in Hawaii. I'm stationed at Hickam AFB and have done my fair share of ferrying missions to and from there in support of test launches. The Japanese and US have been flexing their partnership with the joint missile defense tests as recent at late October. Many of these training missiles are launched from that very same facility in Hawaii. Basic idea one side launches crap into the air and the other side shoots it down. Who's to say it wasn't just a more covert part of those training exercises? See if a sub launched missile could be shot down. But the fact that our government is just coming right out and saying they have no idea...one, I honestly don't think they would risk looking this incompetent by admitting they don't know. And two, I would bet it was US who launched it. I've also heard some folks claim it was an "accidental" launch. Lets be clear. It is IMPOSSIBLE to accidentally launch from a submarine. Way too many fail safes ie: the cookie, the safe who's combination isn't even known on the submarine, multiple keys, etc....
 
Last edited:
Heavy Duty said:
Mystery Missile Launch Seen off Calif. Coast - CBS News

No one knows who the hell fired it. 35 miles off shore means only one thing could have fired it, a sub. Who's we are yet to find out. Could it be a show of force and military might by our bumbling leader for some hairball reason? Or is it another nation letting us know that they can get close enough and have the means to attack our shores?
Click to expand...

Probably just a jet. or a Goa'uld ship.



L.A.’s Mystery ‘Missile’ Is Probably a Jet | Danger Room | Wired.com

GlobalSecurity.org director John Pike, there’s an easy explanation: “It is obviously an airplane.”

“The aircraft is flying towards the observer; the air over the Pacific is clear, so the contrail is visible all the way to the horizon. This creates the optical illusion of a rocket flying up, rather than the actual situation of an airplane flying horizontally,” Pike tells Danger Room. “The object generating the contrail is moving too slowly to be a rocket; the contrail is not expanding as the ‘rocket’ gains ‘altitude’ — which would be the case as the exhaust plume expanding into less dense high altitude air.”

MIT astronomer Jonathan McDowell tells New Scientist pretty much the same thing.
 
Last edited:
Lord Tammerlain said:
You do realize where the Indian ocean is dont you?

And if you do, just why do you think the US might have 34 warships and an aircraft carrier in the region?

Just a hint it is not to protect Obama on a trip to India, and Indonesia
Click to expand...

If it was a classified test, no is going to either. ;)
 
Tedminator said:
Probably just a jet. or a Goa'uld ship.



L.A.’s Mystery ‘Missile’ Is Probably a Jet | Danger Room | Wired.com

GlobalSecurity.org director John Pike, there’s an easy explanation: “It is obviously an airplane.”

“The aircraft is flying towards the observer; the air over the Pacific is clear, so the contrail is visible all the way to the horizon. This creates the optical illusion of a rocket flying up, rather than the actual situation of an airplane flying horizontally,” Pike tells Danger Room. “The object generating the contrail is moving too slowly to be a rocket; the contrail is not expanding as the ‘rocket’ gains ‘altitude’ — which would be the case as the exhaust plume expanding into less dense high altitude air.”

MIT astronomer Jonathan McDowell tells New Scientist pretty much the same thing.
Click to expand...

I haven't really followed this story too closely but, for those of you claiming it was a plane, it was mentioned earlier in the thread that FAA saw nothing on radar. Explain?
 
theangryamerican said:
I haven't really followed this story too closely but, for those of you claiming it was a plane, it was mentioned earlier in the thread that FAA saw nothing on radar. Explain?
Click to expand...

there are always aircraft on the radar, and when asked to search radar for anomalies consistent with a missile launch they disregard them. They would scan a specific area for a vertical launch, they did not take into account a wider range of area and consider slower moving horizontal targets that are always there.. these are not anomalies.
 
Last edited:
ReverendHellh0und said:
I just saw the video, that is most assuredly a solid propellant missile.
Click to expand...

Why was this only reported in one area of California and only captured in limited footage? If this were a launch it would have been seen all up and down the coast, and there would be reports from other areas as well of this, it would to have gone unnoticed aside from one news crews helicopter camera.

Think what you may however. but the missile that is not on radar and only seen in one area story just does not make sense to me.
 
marduc said:
Why was this only reported in one area of California and only captured in limited footage? If this were a launch it would have been seen all up and down the coast, and there would be reports from other areas as well of this, it would to have gone unnoticed aside from one news crews helicopter camera.

Think what you may however. but the missile that is not on radar and only seen in one area story just does not make sense to me.
Click to expand...



From the video you can clearly see the efflux of a solid propellant missile. That is what I can tell from the video.
 
ReverendHellh0und said:
From the video you can clearly see the efflux of a solid propellant missile. That is what I can tell from the video.
Click to expand...

either that or you are filling in the blanks with what you want to see. I could be wrong, but this has all the hallmarks of the Charlie Chaplin cell phone video to it.
 
marduc said:
either that or you are filling in the blanks with what you want to see. I could be wrong, but this has all the hallmarks of the Charlie Chaplin cell phone video to it.
Click to expand...




<---- worked with space launch systems, icbm missile launch and cheyenne mountain upgrade program in an OT&E environment.
 
look at very beginning of this video and how dispersed the trail is at its base.. as I point out earlier in this thread a missile would ascend to quickly to allow time for this to occur.. unless there were some incredibly strong low level winds at launch

[video]http://www.necn.com/11/09/10/Mysterious-missile-launched-off-Californ/landing_scitech.html?blockID=348833&feedID=4213[/video]
 
theangryamerican said:
Tedminator said:
Probably just a jet. or a Goa'uld ship.
L.A.’s Mystery ‘Missile’ Is Probably a Jet | Danger Room | Wired.com
Click to expand...

I haven't really followed this story too closely but, for those of you claiming it was a plane, it was mentioned earlier in the thread that FAA saw nothing on radar. Explain?
Click to expand...

I can't explain. But I am hoping it's the joint Goa'uld/USAF project codenamed Anubis...

AeroVironment's Anubis - Lethal MAV?
Pentagon budget documents for FY2010 describe Project Anubis as a "Tactical MAV for Time-Sensitive Fleeting Targets".



or maybe it's just this:
it_was_awe808.png
 
Last edited:
ReverendHellh0und said:
<---- worked with space launch systems, icbm missile launch and cheyenne mountain upgrade program in an OT&E environment.
Click to expand...

still is not versed in the appearance and formation of jet contrails, and could be just filling in the gaps with what he is familiar with
 
marduc said:
look at very beginning of this video and how dispersed the trail is at its base.. as I point out earlier in this thread a missile would ascend to quickly to allow time for this to occur.. unless there were some incredibly strong low level winds at launch

[video]http://www.necn.com/11/09/10/Mysterious-missile-launched-off-Californ/landing_scitech.html?blockID=348833&feedID=4213[/video]
Click to expand...



what do you base this conjecture on? How hard would the wind need to be blowing? Did you measure the humidity in the air? humidity output of the solid propellant. Air pressure, etc... There are many factors that could or would cause the dispersement pattern you see. Also distance to horizon and position of the camera.


If the missile say was launced at 45 degrees then turned its vertical axis it could cause this for example.
 
Tedminator said:
I can't explain. But I am hoping it's the joint Goa'uld/USAF project codenamed Anubis...

AeroVironment's Anubis - Lethal MAV?
Pentagon budget documents for FY2010 describe Project Anubis as a "Tactical MAV for Time-Sensitive Fleeting Targets".



or maybe it's just this:
it_was_awe808.png
Click to expand...




It very well could be. One would have to get the weather conditions and air tempurature to see if this was the case.
 
marduc said:
still is not versed in the appearance and formation of jet contrails, and could be just filling in the gaps with what he is familiar with
Click to expand...

The only thing you need to know about contrails is that the govt is secretly spraying experimental chemicals on the populace to test their efficacy. :lol:
 
American said:
The only thing you need to know about contrails is that the govt is secretly spraying experimental chemicals on the populace to test their efficacy. :lol:
Click to expand...

You know during the 08 elections I was standing in line with a person that actually said that. I looked three people behind me and asked the person if they would like to switch places.
 
While I do hope the Ori get their asses handed to them got too love the star gate references going on in this thread.


Heavy Duty, I would have just said were is your tin foil hat.
 
Last edited:
Megan Kelley of Fox said it was a MASSIVE ballistic missile. Gotta believe her ;)
 
My two cents. The fact is: there is a rocket launching. Pentagon say they don't know it. Ordinary people have no such resource and ability. Then:

The rogue team of government insiders (who also did 911 attack) this time had an exercise for the nuclear attack. They stole a ballistic missile and launched it. And they found it was very successful that nobody discover the plot. So be careful for a big false flag attack.

651. Terror case around 10/27 (11/2/2010)

My wife was arranged an unusual Chinese trip from 10/17 to 10/27. If a framed drug case broke out at this time, big events would be created to distract public attention. Either there would be natural disasters (artificial), or terror attacks, or the war on Iran, or all of them. A typical one was the plot of April 8, 2009. My wife, severely sickened with flu, returned from her China trip on that day. Around 4/8/2010, there was a pandemic took place in Mexico that killed 168 people in that month. Later, government said that was a new flu and gave it a new name - Swine flu. I had accurately predicted that event in "596. Bio-attack in the name of pandemic (3/30/09)".

This time the big event was terror attack. On 10/29, media made it a big news that two mail bombs from Yemen were found on separate cargo planes. The information was delivered by Saudi-Arabia security to US on 10/28. I think if Feds had activated the framed drug case on 10/27, next day there would be a series of terror bombings in US and Europe. That could have developed to a nuclear attack. People could see it from their pre-psychological propaganda.

Re: "
10/10/21 Clinton Lost Nuclear 'Biscuit'

Published October 21, 2010
FoxNews

At the time, Patterson described how Clinton misplaced the card for months, confessing the loss after being asked to provide the card so it could be replaced with an updated code.

ABC noted that a similar claim was made about former President Jimmy Carter, who was said to have left the card with the launch codes in a suit sent to the dry cleaner.

FoxNews.com - Report: Clinton Lost Nuclear 'Biscuit'
Click to expand...
/ "

Quote, "
Oops! US Air Force loses 50 nukes

Published 28 October, 2010

US military lost track of 50 intercontinental ballistic missiles recently. The incident became public after a former Air Force officer tweeted about the loss of communication between the missiles and the control center.

Oops! US Air Force loses 50 nukes - News
Click to expand...
"

Clinton time is a decade away. Carter time is much older. Why would they beat a dead horse? It's similar to the recent attack on Roman Catholic with decades old sex abusing cases. There is a purpose behind it. Did other presidents of US have committed similar negligence? Why Clinton and Carter were picked up? It抯 because they are in same party with current president - Obama. To make it easy for people to believe Demo-controlled government is negligent in security. These events are used to justify a coming nuclear terror attack. The two news within a week is not a coincidence. It opens a passage of nuclear attack when the low end gate (operation) of air force and the high end gate (command) of President are both opening.

These bombing attack news and nuclear negligence news were all released at a time around 10/27.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom