• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

NAACP backs report that ties racist groups to tea party

Status
Not open for further replies.
The real racism lies within the ranks of the Left Wing, because they can't imagine a black person being a Conservative.

The reason you don't see many black Conservatives, is because of the fear mongering coming from the Left. You say it enough and people will start to believe it. There's not a day that goes by, that Liberals are screaming racism.

IMO, that strategy is going to do more harm than good, to the Left, but carry on.

Fear Mongering is the GOP's middle name.

You still don't understand the real reason blacks aren't seen in the Republican Party and that only says volumes about the typical Republican. Trust me, Black America is able to see through White America true motives more than the other way around.
 
Fear Mongering is the GOP's middle name.

You still don't understand the real reason blacks aren't seen in the Republican Party and that only says volumes about the typical Republican. Trust me, Black America is able to see through White America true motives more than the other way around.

I thought its middle name was "Old". :confused:
 
Trust me, Black America is able to see through White America true motives more than the other way around.
What are "White America"'s true motives?
 
How many black Republicans has the NAACP endorsed? They have no credibility and should not be trusted in my opinion. They will lie about the Tea Party for their own political interests, and they will abuse their status as being the "organization for the advancement of colored people" to push the idea that the Tea Party is indeed, racist. In my opinion, there are more racists in the NAACP than in the Tea Party.
 
Fear Mongering is the GOP's middle name.

You still don't understand the real reason blacks aren't seen in the Republican Party and that only says volumes about the typical Republican. Trust me, Black America is able to see through White America true motives more than the other way around.

I don't trust you.
 
Fear Mongering is the GOP's middle name.

You still don't understand the real reason blacks aren't seen in the Republican Party and that only says volumes about the typical Republican. Trust me, Black America is able to see through White America true motives more than the other way around.

Can you please let me know what my motives are. I was absent at the last White America meeting due to the fact that it's a figment of your imagination.
 
Can you please let me know what my motives are. I was absent at the last White America meeting due to the fact that it's a figment of your imagination.
It was moved to a different Denny's. Didn't you get the memo?
 
Blacks for the forseeable future will be the Hard Core base of the Democratic Party. That's how it Shakes down and as such they will be Pandered to by White Liberals. It won't really improve the lives of many , but no way will that core support be jeopardized.
 
Blacks for the forseeable future will be the Hard Core base of the Democratic Party. That's how it Shakes down and as such they will be Pandered to by White Liberals. It won't really improve the lives of many , but no way will that core support be jeopardized.

Hey, if they want to do something dumb, that's up to them.
 
Well, I get called dumb all the time on this forum, by Liberals. It's assumed, regularly, that I'm white, since I'm a Conservative and won't get in line with the Left wing agenda and I'm "uppity". Yes, I do ask, all the time, who the real racists are.

Here's a prime example of what I'm talking about:

You really don't know what the word hyperbole means do you? Because you'd have to not know what it means to single out a comment I made and then ignore the fact that I myself stated it was hyperbole with the next sentence.
 
Hatuey,

Allow me to clarify...

By all means.

I am referring to American Liberalism more specifically the Welfare State. In its most extreme form, communism, it is capable of producing the worst atrocities mankind has ever seen. However, the American Welfare State in its current form is not worse than slavery. However, I still agree with this statement to make a point. Blacks, other minorities, and even whites are "enslaved" by the Welfare State. It robs them of their dignity forces them into a pattern of thinking that this is the way "we" should live.

And yet that still doesn't come even close to what slavery is. Seriously pick up a book on slavery and cross comparisson it with a book on liberalism. Unless you're reaching something by a biased sourced you can't possibly maintain intellectual credibility and still claim that slavery is better than liberalism. Or are you saying that being dependent on somebody is better than being subservient to them? No no. As I stated before. It's hyperbole.

The liberal ideology creates the “slavery” I am referring to. Therefore, this question is akin to asking, “Would you be a slave or one who supports the enslavement of others?”

No, they support the “enslavement” of others.

And yet this is a complete liberalisation of what the term slavery actually means and more hyperbolic fallacies. I don't support the enslavement of anyone anymore than you do and yet somehow because I approve of welfare programs and you don't that is enslavement? Well what about this: I consider right wing social policies to be far more enslaving than anything liberalism could ever come up with. Historically they have restricted the freedoms of the individual and supported the very real slavery of millions of others in the so called 'democratic world'. Is that hyperbolic enough for you?

Please do not take this personal. I would like to discuss this further. We cannot if your need to have us all agree with you cases such anger. Temper tantrums do not convince me. Sound arguments do.

Here is how I see the situation:

You have argued that liberalism is worse than slavery. There is not a single credible historical source or historian on either side of the fence that would agree with you. Not the CATO institute, not the NAACP not even the Tea Party. It's not an opinion which is based on historical research. It is simply rhetoric. If you are going to complain that 'temper tantrums' are not convicing maybe you should take your own advice and maybe pick up a book on liberalism and the dozens of different ideologies it espouses. When you start the argument off from a completely baseless claim then there is really no room for discussion. It doesn't matter how much historical evidence there is contradicting your argument.
 
Isn't "colored" a racist term?
 
Hatuey,

I said you are right.

However, the American Welfare State in its current form is not worse than slavery.

Please address the point I am making. Do not let your anger blind you.
 
Hatuey,

I said you are right.

Please address the point I am making. Do not let your anger blind you.

Having intensively studied 'slavery' for the past 3 years and having thought about the historical implications of it to the point where I want to go to university simply so that I can become a full fledged expert on it. I simply disagree with your liberalization of the terms slavery and liberalism to make a point. I'd wish my enemy free health care and public housing long before I'd wish them to be slaves. I mean I wouldn't wish the worst of the worst human beings slavery. It's the worst state you can possibly push the human condition into. I also find it quite disrespectful to people who have actually been slaves that somebody who claims to want to engage in rational conversation would start off the conversation with it. The terms aren't even remotely comparable. Not psychologically, not historically, not sociologically. It doesn't matter how much rhetoric you use in an attempt to compare them, in practice they simply don't come close.
 
Last edited:
Hey how come none of your ilk ever call us racist in person?


Sad really, running around digital media bloviating on and on about racism, when not once has it been shown here that ANY of the tea party posters here are racist....


we are learning a lot about you folks, and it aint pretty.
 
Hey how come none of your ilk ever call us racist in person?

Sad really, running around digital media bloviating on and on about racism, when not once has it been shown here that ANY of the tea party posters here are racist....

we are learning a lot about you folks, and it aint pretty.

So what you're saying is that because the 4 and a half people who support the tea party on this forum aren't racist then the Tea Party has no racist elements what so ever? There is a gap of reason in there somewhere. Or is your argument that there are racist elements in the Tea-Party but they don't reflect it as a whole? Two completely different responses to those questions.
 
Last edited:
Of course the NAACP is going to tie in racism with the Tea Party. The Liberals have no choice--especially now--but to scare the crap out of the Black vote with the, "fear whitey", rhetoric. Liberals cultivate racism, more than any other group in the country. Without it, there would never be another Leftist Democrat elected, again.

It'll be a great day--a great day!--in this country, when the Black Community wakes up and sees how they've been used by the Liberals. It'll be yet another signal, that this is the greatest country in the history of mankind.

The number one event that will do the most to stop racism, is the day the NAACP disbands.
 
So what you're saying is that because the 4 and a half people who support the tea party on this forum aren't racist then the Tea Party has no racist elements what so ever? There is a gap in there somewhere. DP doesn't even come close to being a relevant cross section of American politics.


try at least 33. either you are being hyperbolic or ignorant.


and the tea party has no more racist elements in it than the democrat party. Sorry.
 
try at least 33. either you are being hyperbolic or ignorant.and the tea party has no more racist elements in it than the democrat party. Sorry.

Hyperbolic? 33 people? Out of a forum with: 10,000 members. So that makes it what percentage of the Tea Party exatcly? 33 people out of let's say 4 million strong aren't racist. What does that prove exatcly? Well I guess that kind of disproves a claim that the Tea Party itself has racist elements in it. Only it doesn't. Because I personally don't know what your real views or those of the other 32 people are on race. So please, answer my questions.

What is your argument? That there are no racist elements in the tea party or that there are but they don't reflect the tea party?


Now if you're saying that the Democratic party has a lot of racist elements and I know you well enough to know that you probably are then what does that say for the Tea Party? That it has just as many? Or that it has one less? I'd like to know what your argument is. I'm fully aware of the fact that the Democratic Party was involved in racist activities. So what exactly does this say for the Tea Party? Or are you going to shy away from my questioning?
 
Last edited:
Free thought and liberty is worse than slavery...????

Huh?

If liberals are for liberty, why do they do everything they can to discredit the tea party?
Why do they want to restrict individual freedom?
 
Hyperbolic? 33 people? Out of a forum with: 10,000 members. So that makes it what percentage of the Tea Party exatcly? 33 people out of let's say 4 million strong aren't racist. What does that prove exatcly? Well I guess that kind of disproves a claim that the Tea Party itself has racist elements in it. Only it doesn't. Because I personally don't know what your real views are on race. So please, answer my questions.

Again with the hyperbole? 10,000 active members? please hatuey.

My views on race? I am not a racist, I think all folks are equal. I abhor racism. I hope that clears things up for you chief.

What is your argument that there are no racist elements in the tea party or that there are but they don't reflect the tea party?


There are no more racist elements in the teaparty than there is in the democrat party. and just like you alluded to in another thread about muslims and airplanes, folks are just reacting to what the media is making up about us. :shrug:

Now if you're saying that the Democratic party has a lot of racist elements and I know you well enough to know that you probably do then what does that say for the Tea Party? That it has just as many? Or that it has one less? I'd like to know what your argument is. I'm fully aware of the fact that the Democratic Party was involved in racist activities. So what exactly does this say for the Tea Party? Or are you going to shy away from my questioning?


A coherent thought please.


I think there are racists who consider themselves tea party folk, I think there are racists who think themselves as democrats. Yet I'm not starting 5 threads a day smearing democrats for having racist elements in thier party.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom