• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Del. Senate candidate O'Donnell: 'I'm not a witch'

Councilman said:
This whole topic is nothing but B.S. nothing that she did as a silly teenager has any relevance with today.

If it did Obama is still a COKE FREAK, which by the way would explain a lot.

Liberals idiots are grabbing at staws again.
Click to expand...

Dems are running big on personal attacks this year; they can't exactly argue for their record, so nastiness is all they've got.
 
cpwill said:
Dems are running big on personal attacks this year; they can't exactly argue for their record, so nastiness is all they've got.
Click to expand...

And those republican/tea party candidates doing and saying stupid things have no responsiblity for they say? Gottcha. ;)
 
TurtleDude said:
being nuts is hardly limited to her

ever heard Maxine Waters rant?
Click to expand...

Why do you keep attempting to deflect from Christine O'Donnell? If you want to talk about Maxine Waters, post a thread on her.

Do you, or do you not, think Christine O'Donnell is a good candidate for higher office?
 
Boo Radley said:
And those republican/tea party candidates doing and saying stupid things have no responsiblity for they say? Gottcha. ;)
Click to expand...

Republicans this year are generally issue-oriented; given the unpopularity of the dem-leadership agenda hey can afford to be. but some democrats are becoming near-unhinged. *coughalangraysoncough*

Democrats believe they have only one option: a thermonuclear assault on their GOP opponents, which means raising questions about their character, distorting their views, and making outlandish claims.

Many Democratic incumbents now routinely assert in their ads that Republicans who pledge not to raise taxes support shipping jobs overseas—a claim that the nonpartisan FactCheck.org has found to be false. Oregon Congressman Kurt Schrader featured a senior citizen saying that if Republican challenger Scott Bruun "had his way, I'd be out on the street." Arizona Democrat Harry Mitchell accused Republican David Schweikert of being a slumlord who tried to evict a 12-year-old child. He couldn't produce the boy. Virginia's Gerry Connolly attacked Keith Fimian, his GOP challenger, for working against women's rights because he was a member of Legatus, a respected Catholic lay organization that opposes abortion.

In a debate last month, Sen. Blanche Lincoln (D., Ark.) accused Republican challenger John Boozman of having voted in Congress to let an incestuous rapist father sue a physician who performed an abortion on the daughter the father had raped. Mr. Boozman had no idea what Ms. Lincoln was talking about, and when challenged she couldn't back up her charge. Mr. Boozman now leads by 19 points in the Real Clear Politics average.

Personal attacks generally don't work unless they're seen as fair, credible and pertinent. Voters must think the character shortcomings are both persistent and relevant. If not, the assaults will fail, even backfire....
 
plus (and i'm not sure this has been commented on), if she was a witch... don't they do their ceremonies naked? :elephantf


:lamo
 
Last edited:
cpwill said:
Republicans this year are generally issue-oriented; given the unpopularity of the dem-leadership agenda hey can afford to be. but some democrats are becoming near-unhinged. *coughalangraysoncough*

Democrats believe they have only one option: a thermonuclear assault on their GOP opponents, which means raising questions about their character, distorting their views, and making outlandish claims.

Many Democratic incumbents now routinely assert in their ads that Republicans who pledge not to raise taxes support shipping jobs overseas—a claim that the nonpartisan FactCheck.org has found to be false. Oregon Congressman Kurt Schrader featured a senior citizen saying that if Republican challenger Scott Bruun "had his way, I'd be out on the street." Arizona Democrat Harry Mitchell accused Republican David Schweikert of being a slumlord who tried to evict a 12-year-old child. He couldn't produce the boy. Virginia's Gerry Connolly attacked Keith Fimian, his GOP challenger, for working against women's rights because he was a member of Legatus, a respected Catholic lay organization that opposes abortion.

In a debate last month, Sen. Blanche Lincoln (D., Ark.) accused Republican challenger John Boozman of having voted in Congress to let an incestuous rapist father sue a physician who performed an abortion on the daughter the father had raped. Mr. Boozman had no idea what Ms. Lincoln was talking about, and when challenged she couldn't back up her charge. Mr. Boozman now leads by 19 points in the Real Clear Politics average.

Personal attacks generally don't work unless they're seen as fair, credible and pertinent. Voters must think the character shortcomings are both persistent and relevant. If not, the assaults will fail, even backfire....
Click to expand...

No, they really aren't issue-oriented. That's just wishful spin on your part. The entire socialist fear mongering nonsense si not issue-oriented. Being anti establishment and anti-liberal (whatever they mena by that) isn't being issue-oriented. It's being a populist attack dog.

Pick your race, I bet there's an attack ad being aired. ;)
 
"she votes with nancy pelosi 98% of the time"

"he's a rubber stamp for obama"

"taxes are going up on the average american 3 to 4000 dollars per year starting in just under 3 months"

"you hate obamacare"

good enough for a pickup of 63 seats, according to excrutiatingly cautious rcp

RealClearPolitics - 2010 Election Maps - Battle for the House
 
cpwill said:
plus (and i'm not sure this has been commented on), if she was a witch... don't they do their ceremonies naked? :elephantf


:lamo
Click to expand...
Skyclad is optional :)
 
The Prof said:
"she votes with nancy pelosi 98% of the time"

"he's a rubber stamp for obama"

"taxes are going up on the average american 3 to 4000 dollars per year starting in just under 3 months"

"you hate obamacare"

good enough for a pickup of 63 seats, according to excrutiatingly cautious rcp

RealClearPolitics - 2010 Election Maps - Battle for the House
Click to expand...

Like I said, pick a race and the attack ads will be their for all to see. Thanks for backing me up on that. ;)
 
It is in the nature of all Liberal wackos to attack anyone who the slightest bit Conservative articulate and attractive with everything they have, which id never based in fact.

Liberals can not deal in reality with the truth of the facts. It's a sad reality they have as yet failed to dome to terms with. Until they do they will continue falling for thr bovine scatology that emanates from Obama every time he opens his huge dumb assed mouth.
 
Councilman said:
It is in the nature of all Liberal wackos to attack anyone who the slightest bit Conservative articulate and attractive with everything they have, which id never based in fact.

Liberals can not deal in reality with the truth of the facts. It's a sad reality they have as yet failed to dome to terms with. Until they do they will continue falling for thr bovine scatology that emanates from Obama every time he opens his huge dumb assed mouth.
Click to expand...

:lamo Get a grip. She has said some really stupid ****. You think we should give her a pass on this? :lamo
 
Councilman said:
It is in the nature of all Liberal wackos to attack anyone who the slightest bit Conservative articulate and attractive with everything they have, which id never based in fact.

Liberals can not deal in reality with the truth of the facts. It's a sad reality they have as yet failed to dome to terms with. Until they do they will continue falling for thr bovine scatology that emanates from Obama every time he opens his huge dumb assed mouth.
Click to expand...


You might have a point if it were only evil liberal whackos who think she is a raving lunatic idiot.
 
Councilman said:
It is in the nature of all Liberal wackos to attack anyone who the slightest bit Conservative articulate and attractive with everything they have, which id never based in fact.

Liberals can not deal in reality with the truth of the facts. It's a sad reality they have as yet failed to dome to terms with. Until they do they will continue falling for thr bovine scatology that emanates from Obama every time he opens his huge dumb assed mouth.
Click to expand...

Hahaha. Desperate sexism card. So sad, councilman.
 
Boo Radley said:
Like I said, pick a race and the attack ads will be their for all to see. Thanks for backing me up on that. ;)
Click to expand...

i find it hilarious that you admit that discussing a Democrat's record of votes is an 'attack ad'.


you can't talk about obamacare!!! that's a dirty smear!!! that wasn't me, i was in bermuda at the time, my evil twin shaved his mustache and voted for me, i swear!!!

:lol:
 
Boo Radley said:
:lamo Get a grip. She has said some really stupid ****. You think we should give her a pass on this? :lamo
Click to expand...

tell me again who your vice president is?
 
Tell me again what Christine O'Donnell is not?

Not a witch.

Not a Yale attendee.

Anything else?

… Not sane?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom