Seeing as you haven’t provided a link to where you got your figures I can only assume that you pulled it out of the air, are possibly somewhere else. My site is a Gov site as well and the numbers that you cite don’t jibe with mine. While were on my site, check this out.
The year
2001, our country had receipts of "2,020.3" that year we had a bottom line number of
34.2 without one of these next to it-.
Comes
2002, we had receipts of ‘1,859.3” but it had one of these next to it.- preceded with this number
“278”.Hhmm…don’t like the looks of them minus signs.
Whoo..doggies, these minus signs are getting serous now. Surely, unlike the
“The Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001” that produced the first – minus sign, the
“Jobs and Growth Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2003” will not do the same. :shock:
Alas and alack, along comes the year of "2003",with these numbers “1885.1” with a –minus
"422.2". How can this be? Surely we…no,no, its to frightful to be…payen someones tax-cuts with borrowed money from...a commie country..nah.
Sigh,”2004” rolls in with a 2013.9 draggen a big fat –
426.8 behind it. This s*** cant go on…
CAN IT?
"2005" brought us a “2290.1” and look what popped out of the friggin Rabbit Hole with it. A NEGATIVE
352.4- :roll:
2006……………….bizarreo.."2524.5" with a –
247.2
2007………………bizarreo.."2654.7" with a –
315
2008………………bizarreo.. "2503.1" with a-
755.2
Sadly, what all of these numbers mean is were borrowing money from a Communist country, China, to pay the top 2% of our populations tax cuts. Here look for yourself.
U.S. Department of Commerce. Bureau of Economic Analysis