- Joined
- Sep 7, 2010
- Messages
- 26,526
- Reaction score
- 9,462
- Location
- Alabama
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
Get over yourselves boys..you arent that hot.
:lol: maybe you need to take a closer look at my avatar...I am that hot :lol:
Get over yourselves boys..you arent that hot.
If it is OK for the commander in chief to get a blowjob at his desk in the oval office, then dammit, it is OK for me to get one at my desk in the battalion ops center
I don't know about y'all, but if I was about to go and risk getting myself splattered all over the desert by some illiterate camel herder, I'd sure as hell be wanting to have the chance to empty my nuts in a chick's mouth once or twice before I go.
But that's just me ... :shrug:
:lol: maybe you need to take a closer look at my avatar...I am that hot :lol:
You guys aren't seeing the big picture. Getting a blow job - at ANY time - is detrimental to the safety of the soldiers everywhere. And unit cohesion. And stuffs. A tongue touching a dick will cause soldiers and puppies to die. Why do you hate the soldiers so much?
So your saying the majority of gay men can't control themselves, or don't understand that the majority of people he would be working with aren't gay?
Seriously, it's not like their going to be treating their service in the military like an outing at their local gay bar.
If they can't follow the fraternization rule they should be punished. But why should gay people, or straight women for that matter, that follow the rules be punished for being who they are?
nope! Never said that. When I was with 1/8CAV, 2nd BGD, 1st CAV at Ft. Hood, the commander of our support battalion got busted in the parking lot of the PX, getting his dick sucked by a female SPC4. He was married, she was married, they both fried. They were both burned with two counts from Article 134 and one count from Article 125, which is exaclty what should have happened.
You guys aren't seeing the big picture. Getting a blow job - at ANY time - is detrimental to the safety of the soldiers everywhere. And unit cohesion. And stuffs. A tongue touching a dick will cause soldiers and puppies to die. Why do you hate the soldiers so much?
I will take a closer look, Oscar. Got one in a speedo? ;-)
Ap, I think that is almost apples and oranges. That is not just a case of 2 folks having a quick romp in the back seat of a car. You are dealing with a superior officer and a non-com. Had they both been SPC4, they might have been in a little bit of trouble just on a public indecency charge, but probably not much beyond administrative punishment would have happened.
So, if they get rid of DADT, then its all okay? As long as they adhere to the UCMJ they are okay? If they violate it, they are just like any straight soldier who voilates it? I think what most dont seem to get is that gays have ALWAYS been serving in the military. There were gay soldiers in the continental army..there were gays in WW I, WW ll, and every war since then and before. We have not disintegrated from it yet. Why, do you think it will be any different from now on?
So... has anyone looked at the actual court decision, or have any desire to talk about it?
I skipped a couple of pages, but it doesn't seem like it.
My point is, that in an infantry unit, that problem doesn't exist, among the ranks. Why? Because there are no females in infantry units.
Personally, I don't think there sould be ANY co-ed units in the Army. They should be male, or female.
What if two soldiers are on a LP/OP--listening post/observation post--and they are playing around, rather than listening and observing. Then, yes, soldiers's lives are in jeopardy. That's no different than falling asleep on gaurd duty.
In that case, not only would those soldiers being violating the UCMJ, they would be directly disobeying their 1st General Order, another court martial offense.
What if two soldiers are on a LP/OP--listening post/observation post--and they are playing around, rather than listening and observing. Then, yes, soldiers's lives are in jeopardy. That's no different than falling asleep on gaurd duty.
In that case, not only would those soldiers being violating the UCMJ, they would be directly disobeying their 1st General Order, another court martial offense.
If they get rid of DADT, then we get into the issue of seperate billets, because there are going to be straight soldiers who refuse to billet with gay soldiers and vice-versa.
No, I'm not saying that. You'r putting words into my mouth.
What I am saying, is that gays are no different than straights. If straights can do stupid ****, gays will do stupid **** at the same rate. Which will equate to higher rate of stupid ****.
Some will. Just like their straight male soliders, who purposefully enlist in mostly female MOS's, so they can go scout *****.
I don't think anyone is being punished for being who they are. Gays join the military, fully aware of DADT. It is a regulation and I'm not going to shed any tears for them, if they get busted violating the regulations.
What if 2 different soldiers in the same situation were passing around a bottle of Jack Daniels. Soldiers lives would be in jeopardy. Should the military proactively make any and all drinking grounds for discharge just in case some alcoholic soldiers cannot control themselves in a combat situation?
It shouldn't exist at all. Are you suggesting people can't be adults, and that heterosexual males will have sex willingly with homosexual males?
If they get rid of DADT, then we get into the issue of seperate billets, because there are going to be straight soldiers who refuse to billet with gay soldiers and vice-versa.
What if 2 different soldiers in the same situation were passing around a bottle of Jack Daniels. Soldiers lives would be in jeopardy. Should the military proactively make any and all drinking grounds for discharge just in case some alcoholic soldiers cannot control themselves in a combat situation?
LMFAO
Yeah, so making it a court-martial offense to get a blow job from your wife is the way to fix that. :lol:
You really want to continue making the military look that retarded?