You know, I have a huge problem with the way Franklin Graham presented this.
1) First of all, he had an attitude of "If this is what Obama says, then it must be true", rather than just saying Obama was not a Muslim. The way he framed his answer left a question.
2) What Ghadafi believes is not even relevant here. Franklin didn't even need to bring that up. Why did he?
3) Religion is not a condition brought about by genetics. It is a choice. Barack Obama has never been a Muslim, period. His father may have been Muslim, but he abandoned his family as soon as Barack was born. Please tell me how that makes Obama born a Muslim. It doesn't.
4) Finally, in saying that he believed that Obama renounced Islam, Graham told a lie. Obama never had to renounce Islam because he was never Islamic.
What kind of Christianity does Graham practice, when he clearly casts dispersion on another Christian? Christ did say one thing, though - That we would know of someone by the fruits he bears. And the fruit that Graham has beared, in his interview, is rotten. But what can one expect, when you have a preacher like Graham, who is known for "comforting the afflicted without afflicting the comfortable"? It is a weak Christianity, which the Bible just happens to address. The church in Laodicea, in Revelations, certainly comes to mind here.
Mr. Graham - Those who live in glass houses shouldn't throw stones.
