- Joined
- Sep 29, 2007
- Messages
- 29,262
- Reaction score
- 10,126
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
Trust me I don't............
It seems to be on your mind alot.
Trust me I don't............
to me it has very little to do with morals, its more disgust.....
You are missing the main point. Does it pass the scrutiny test?
Then don't have gay sex, duh.
My apologies. I meant on terms other than race.
Do children have gender? Do more than 2 people have gender? Gender is a factor in any alternative lifestyle. How can you descriminate against that?
Which does not address your claim that "most people" consider it deviant.
It must really stick in the craw of you lefties that uour hero Hussien Obama won't say he is for Gay Marriage......
The judge talked about gender roles in marriage. He did not talk about age restrictions or restrictions on the number of people in the marriage.
You cannot rationally say that because gender roles are protected, every single role is equally protected. There is zero basis in law for that.
Why do you think that every time it comes to a vote even in liberal states Gay Marriage is soundly defeated?
You can be against gay marriage and not consider homosexuality deviant. Try again. Links with numbers would work.
It must really stick in the craw of you lefties that uour hero Hussien Obama won't say he is for Gay Marriage......
1) Obama is not mine, nor most of the liberals on this boards hero. This is a lie you keep trying to spread.
2) He is perfectly capable of being wrong, just as you and I are. I think he is wrong on gay marriage. I am no more upset about it than I am that you are wrong on gay marriage.
Of course he didn't because he had a singular goal in mind.
I can not rationally say? Are you not injecting your own opinion of what is rational? Why? Where are there age limits under the equal protection clause?
What does Obama The President of the United States with this ruling?
No substantial or rational interest in allowing them? LOL Since when was your personal opinion of what is ration or substantial count as law? This is what is so pathetic in your argument. You can't discriminate against other lifestyles without injecting what you think is substantial or rational
Nowhere in the equal protection clause states that a finding my CT or any other poster can exclude other alternative lifestyles based on their own feelings on what is substantial or rational interest :lamo
Again its not being homosexual, its the sin or sex act they participate in...Christians are taught to hate the act or the sin and love the sinner.............
From what I have seen "Most Feel Good Liberals" believe is the second coming and can do no wrong........
From what I have seen "Most Feel Good Liberals" believe is the second coming and can do no wrong........
I said Christians...
Which does not address your claim that "most people" consider it deviant.
You can be against gay marriage and not consider homosexuality deviant. Try again. Links with numbers would work.
Again its not being homosexual, its the sin or sex act they participate in...Christians are taught to hate the act or the sin and love the sinner.............
I am sorry you don't believe that but if you took a poll of Christians you would find that is the case........
This post has a complete lack of links or numbers to prove your claim Navy. Are you going to duck out on proving yet another claim?
The Bible is a good link..........