Zyphlin .
California law discriminates against polygamist's in such a way that limits the fundamental right to marry more than one, who's affections, and emotional bond is uniquely singular.
Marriage under the law is not about emotional bonds, nor affections. There is no requirement under the law that one must be emotionally bonded to said person, nor love them, nor have any affections to them. Indeed, there are numerous people who are married that have none of those things. Just as I reject people arguing gay rights on the notion that "Gay people have the right to marry the person they love", I'd reject your notion as well.
Furthermore, again, you've shown no evidence as to why they have a fundamental right to marry more than one person.
CA law requires that only two people, of independent standing, can substantively experience the love, and the emotional ties that impart the wanting of a marriage commitment, whereas, the polygamist is limited by CA law, in the wanting of marriage among as many persons the individual's they themselves loves, and maintains the emotional ties that impart the very same wanting of a marriage commitment.
Again, nothing that I've seen in any marriage law requires "emotional ties" nor "Love". Additionally, a person not being able to have what they want when another person can have what they want is not an example of inequality that reaches any kind of reasonable level for the courts. To suggest such is actually a reasonable level of suggested "discrimination" would be to suggest someone could challenge that they should have to pay less taxes than someone else because they want to pay the government less money and the law doesn't allow them too while it allows someone else to pay more money.
Simply not giving you what you want isn't an example of inequality.
You've still not demonstrated where one group is getting something tangible specifically under the law that the other group is unable to get.
The example you've given thus far is.
"Person A who want a 2 person relationship can marry the person they love, but person B who want a 3 person relationship can't marry all the people they want to love".
Love is not a basis under the law for marriage, nor does anywhere in the law of marriage does it require said love. Additionally, one could pretty easily argue there's no equality there either. If Person A loves 3 people, he can still only marry one of those he loves. If person B loves only 1 person he can marry that one person. Both groups can do EXACTLY the same thing.
That's not the case with Gender, which is directly attached to the law.
There is no legal precedent that concludes with a condition that the fundamental right that marriage carries, be of only two people, only that people have the fundamental right to marriage.
Indeed, and the government....since its a government contract....can define said contract as long as the law remains constitutional.
It is CA law that places a limitation on the number of individuals that can experience the same kind of wanting, and love, and emotional ties that bind a marriage commitment
Actually, to my knowledge the CA law doesn't place any limit on "wanting, love, and emotional ties". It doesn't deal with it at all to my understanding. If you want to quote the piece of the law that does that'd be great, either the law specifically or an example showing that the marriage can not occur if the couple is not shown to have "wanting, love, and emotional ties".
[quote[Therefore, it is my opinion, that the State of CA discriminates against polygamist, and their practice, by limiting their practice altogether, rendering a polygamist as less worthy of the same protections of love, and marriage, by limiting the amount of people the polygamist can share those natural affections for the wanting of marriage.[/quote]
You're suggesting they've got protection against something the law doesn't dictate from all I've seen.
Interesting take, and the best take off of the "Gays should be able to marry who they love!" argument attribute to polygamy that I've seen. However since I've never agreed with the notion of discrimination in regards to not being able to marry the person you love with gays, and since I don't base my own views off it at all, I'm not inclined to agree with it for polygamists nor necessarily admit any hypocrisy in my stance for doing so. Definitely one of the better takes on it though.