• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

California gay marriage ban overturned: report

Status
Not open for further replies.
Yet gays force their lifestyle on us

I wanna know what prissy homo kicked your ass in a Pottery Barn and then stuffed his **** down your throat while making you watch reruns of the Mary Tyler Moore Show?
 
That is federal this is a state issue what does the state constitution say. This can be used when it becomes a federal issue

State's are also held to the Bill of Rights and the rights and liberties of the individual. A State, for instance, can not resume slavery as a practice even if the majority wanted it; even if it's in the State constitution.
 
Next time a gay person tries to hump/sex you or force you to marry him/her, you'll have a point.

A person simply existing, as gay, does not count as forcing their lifestyle on you.

Not true they have parades and demand the public accept them
 
Cough Cough "No it's not" Cough Cough.

Nice try though.

Different label, doesn't piss the majority off, get's the important stuff done.

How is it not? It provides the same benefits, but separate to marriage. Last time I checked that was separate but equal.
 
Sure, the fact that they had a vote and the majority of people voted in favor of traditional marriage. Yet now they rule it's unconstitutional when many states have done similar things with no problems. It's a ramming through of liberal values. They lost at the ballots, so they had to force it through via activist judges. It's wrong to trample on the voters like that.

They aren't allowed to vote in things that are illegal/unconstitutional.
 
Not true they have parades and demand the public accept them

You don't have to accept jack ****. You don't even have to watch their parades. You can go on hating gays and gay marriage as much as you want. But you can't actually infringe upon the rights of others.
 
My parents and brother in law both got married in a courtroom without a religious official present.

Good for them. I got married at home by a notary of the public and she shocked us when she used Bible verses
 
Not true they have parades and demand the public accept them

Yeah, just like this. :roll:

3d63b2c9549f52b9965c1e0387571659.jpg
 
They aren't allowed to vote in things that are illegal/unconstitutional.

It wasn't deemed to be illegal or unconstitutional when it was placed on the ballot, and in other states challenges were shot down. You do realize the judge who ruled this is Vaugh Walker. He's one of the few openly gay federal judges >_>
 
Hint: as of right now, this is a state issue. Obama is not involved. Sorry to point out that your little predictable anti-Obama rant has nothing to do with this.

obama's position has nothing to do with this?

LOL!

unbelievable
 
Not true they have parades and demand the public accept them

I don't care if you call all gay people faggot, sons of Dorthy and absolutely hate them.
I don't care if you accept them personally but legally we have to because that is justice.

The fact is people are allowed to have parades, gay or not.
People are allowed to associate with other people that are similar to them.

That is the Constitution as written.
Now you can try to rewrite it but I'll be against that as well.
 

:shrug: this was in the cards the whole time, ever since the Judge tried to expose those he disagreed with to public danger and the State Government illegally refused to defend it's own laws. it's always been headed to the Supreme Court because it was always blatant how he would 'rule'. 'Rule' being the key word, there. all i can say on that is that now that we have decided to grant Judges the right to dictate our marriages; i can't wait to laugh my head off when a fundamentalist Christian judge invalidates marriage off of no-fault divorce. :D hooray for kings!

as for those who think this is going to be a victory - you don't win in American politics by giving the vast majority of it's citizens the middle finger. all you do is provoke backlash. the homosexul-marriage advocacy community should have tried to convince the American citizenry of the rightness of their cause, like the Civil Rights movement whom they claim kinship to but whose lessons they ignore.
 
No they don't that is why churches are tax exempt

Ok first you claim the constitution does not apply to the states

Now you are claiming that the government has no power to tax nonprofits

Where are you getting your legal ideas from?
 
That doesn't tell me why gay people shouldn't be allowed to get married.
The most your and other arguments have ammounted to is, "it offends me."

That kind of breaks the whole conservative dynamic of personal responsibility and absolute justice.
You guys contradict yourselves all the time.

It is the law just like DOMA
 
It wasn't deemed to be illegal or unconstitutional when it was placed on the ballot, and in other states challenges were shot down. You do realize the judge who ruled this is Vaugh Walker. He's one of the few openly gay federal judges >_>

So your saying that a gay judge can't make a fair decision?

I've asked you this before but can you provide a Non-Religious reason to oppose gay marriage?
 
obama's position has nothing to do with this?

LOL!

unbelievable

Well, unless you can show he has some control over the California constitution...
 
All I can recommend is that you read the 14th amendment. This has been the law of the land for well over 100 years.

Federal we are talking state. Remember a judge just said states can not enforce federal law
 
someone should really send this thread to barry

cuz, y'know what?

(shh)

he's not really a believer

sometimes i really have to wonder if he really is, after all, ONE OF US

LOL!
 
Not true they have parades and demand the public accept them

So do the Irish! Dammit! We should have known!!!!

They force us to watch them march! They drag us out of our homes and point guns at us and force us, just force us!

Man, I am always amazed at how you guys never ever realize how ridiculous you sound.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom