- Joined
- May 15, 2010
- Messages
- 27,392
- Reaction score
- 20,164
- Location
- Georgia
- Gender
- Female
- Political Leaning
- Socialist
Because state constitution says so
Federal Constitution overrules that.
Because state constitution says so
"people like you..."
LOL!
deal with the consequences of your VICTORY
november nears
We'll see. It's a tough Supreme Court - but Kennedy has voted in favor of gay rights in 3 of 4 cases that have made it that far.
Asking for a rationale is not going to yield results. I suggest you save your energy.
The mouth foaming is exactly why prop 8 was defeated. There is no real reason to ban gay marriage in the year 2010. They've lost now and they'll eventually lose at the federal level for similar reasons. It's the same reason why DOMA was struck down not too long ago.
unbelievable
for all you know, i'm personally (LOL!) in favor of gay marriage
but whoever pushes it in this political climate is gonna have to pay for his or her position
it's just the way it is
party on!
Because state constitution says so
We'll say it again
Activist Judges= A judge who makes a decision one does not agree with/ most of the time.
If you can read the ruling, and cite evidence that it's an "activist" ruling then post it. If you can't prove it(which you can't) then you should have a problem with this judges ruling.
I know. It's been the talk of the news here in CA how they preempted the judge's ruling, basically showing they had no intentions of following the court's decision.
Any word on whether or not the stay of verdict is being granted?
"people like you..."
LOL!
deal with the consequences of your VICTORY
november nears
And Scalia has stated that gay rights could win if they came in as a 14th Amendment issue.
Done and done.
But if a gay judge cannot rule fairly on an issue involving gay marriage, there is no evidence a strait could either. Who do you think it is that oppose gay marriage...straits maybe?
Because state constitution says so
Married people
Yep. Another activist judge overthrowing the will of the people for a second time based on nothing but their own personal politics.
Sad but predictable.
Federal Constitution overrules that.
No an activist judge rules on personal and political beliefs
So a gay judge, overturns a gay marriage ban....
Great, so when does the appeal get filed and make this ruling pointless again?
And Scalia has stated that gay rights could win if they came in as a 14th Amendment issue.
Done and done.
No an activist judge rules on personal and political beliefs
Married people
NOt quite sure who you think I would be more likely to vote for in November....
Why?
Why should it say that?
Facts, I need them.