Hicup
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Oct 11, 2009
- Messages
- 9,081
- Reaction score
- 2,709
- Location
- Rochester, NY
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Very Conservative
Frankly, I could care on that front as well, as long as children were precluded (just as it stands now) and they were willing to swear under oath (said children) that they were under no duress, and this is really what they want.
Maybe a guardian ad litem.
For everybody else, see first four words on this post.
Let's return to the topic-at-hand, shall we?
But the question of fundamental right is the point of this debate, isn't it? Without a fundamental right, the 14th is rendered moot. If I were arguing against gay marriage, I would argue that marriage if fundamental at all is held precisely for one man, and one woman. Please take the opposing view councilor..
Tim-