• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Prop C passes overwhelmingly


Thanks Prof. I don't have time to play his silly games today.

Libs seem to forget that Reagan only agreed to the tax hikes if spending would be drastically cut. When Congress didn't cut spending, Reagan vetoed the budget bill and it was subsequently overridden by Congress. Yet they continue to claim it was Reagan that raised the deficit.
 
Yes, thank you Prof, apparently the facts were a little too difficult for Gill to debate when they're not in his favor. So you saved us both a lot time and effort by completely changing the subject from Prop C, to Reagan, and now to the corruption of big banks and corporate greed. Although I must say, it probably isn't too much of a stretch to connect the dots there, too. Savings and loan scandle ring a bell? Where's my chalkboard?

Well now lets see, Dodd was beholding to Goldman Sachs. But then he ain't running for re-election again so he's irrelevant now. Geitner was a former employee of Goldman Sachs and appointed to the NYFederal Reserve during the Bush adminsitration and replaced Henry Paulson, a former Goldman Sachs CEO as Treasury Secratary. So guess who Goldman Sachs is contributing heavily to this year? Republicans. Don't kid yourself, if a Conservative takes the whitehouse in 2012, it will still be Goldman Sachs pulling the strings.

Big Pharma got its way with Bush's pharmacutical bill which is bankrupting Medicare and thats why we needed a healthcare bill. But the politicians cowtowed to them again and watered down healthcare bill and if big business gets their way the bill will be repealed, medicare will go bankrupt and then hundreds of millions of Americans will not have medical insurance and won't be able to afford medical care and will end up going bankrupt. The only thing conservatives are promising for Americans here is sickness, poverty and death.

The whacked out radical Koch brothers have taken over the tea party movement and if they get enough tea partiers elected they want to wipe out all the social safety nets for the middle class (public education, social security, unemployment, minimum wage, labor unions, etc) and abolish all regulations protecting the environment. The only thing conservatives are promising for Americans here is a dumbed down dirty banana republic. So as China moves forward, America moves backward.

My what an ugly sick future you conservatives have in mind for America.
 
Yes, thank you Prof, apparently the facts were a little too difficult for Gill to debate when they're not in his favor. So you saved us both a lot time and effort by completely changing the subject from Prop C, to Reagan, and now to the corruption of big banks and corporate greed. Although I must say, it probably isn't too much of a stretch to connect the dots there, too. Savings and loan scandle ring a bell? Where's my chalkboard?
Prof changed the subject ???? You have a very short memory. Sad when you can't remember your own postings:

Moot said:
Embarrassed? No, not really, since Obama's ratings mirror Reagan's ratings during his second year in office. But then I must admit I'm embarrassed that I voted for Reagan, twice.
 
Prof changed the subject ???? You have a very short memory. Sad when you can't remember your own postings:

Oh, you must be right, the Prof changed the subject from Prop C to Obama ratings first, then I made the comparison to Reagan ratings and then you joined in and then you quickly skidaddled when confronted with the facts and THEN the Prof changed the subject again to banks and corporate greed and now here we are. So what subject would you like to talk about now? Or should we leave it up to the Prof to surprise us? LOL
 
Last edited:
last i remember we were talking about OBAMA'S cahoots with big banks and corporate greed---the grandfathered aig bailouts, the instructions from the ny fed to aig to keep secrets from the sec, the secret deal with phrma, the load of lobbyists in this administration put there, so many of em, by john podesta...

the thread started with the earth shaking announcement that a full SEVENTY ONE PERCENT of show me's, who almost never miss the national mood, screamed NO to our corrupt chief exec's MANDATE that they must buy that prohibitively expensive private product

i remember being blown away by the discovery that 580,000 reds turned out in missouri compared to just 315,000 depressed dems

in michigan, i think it was the same day, 1.05 million republicans voted, only 525,000 dismal dems

did you see wisconsin's primary 3 days ago, where walker downed neumann and ron johnson ran comfortably?

615,000 knuckle draggers outpolled 233,000 enlightened in the badger state, a ratio of TWO POINT SIX FOUR TO ONE

do you realize that whomever the cheeseheads send to the senate has a very solid chance of determining ultimate ownership?

seeya in 6 weeks!
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom