• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Fox News Receives Front-Row Seat in White House Briefing Room

Let's put it this way:

The networks the lefties call "news" channels tried to perpuate the lie that a Fox News broadcast led to the compelled resignation of that Sherrod woman.

Screamin' Dean told FOXNEWS just that. He was immediately corrected by Mike Wallace, who said that his program was going to stick with the facts and Dean was not going to be allowed to continue with that lie on Fox.

So Dean repeated his lie on another network. Which tolerated it.

So Fox reported the NEWS, which was that Fox had not aired one word about Sherrod before the Messiah panicked and forced her to resign before Beck went on the air.

The above actions, Fox, the news channel; Dean, the typical Democrat mouthpiece; and the propaganda channels, are typical for each player, and precisely why the news channel has the huge lead in the ratings. People watch news programs to learn the truth, not hear propaganda.
 
I keep hearing about some Messiah. Too weird.
 
So let me see if I get this 100% straight; the people defending Fox here (the conservatives here) believe that Fox news has no conservative bias whatsoever?

I doubt if many will deny that Fox has a conservative bias.

So what?

Of the other 999 TV news networks out there, 999 of them have an extreme left wing bias.

Besides which,......the conservative bias on Fox results in:

Persistence in exposing corruption in the White House and the Democrat Congress. I figure that since no other network is doing this, we should pay attention to the only one attempting the task. There is, however, over 200 Democrats elected to office in Washington, and only 24 hours in a day. It would be nice of the Propaganda Networks got their heads out of Obama's ass and started remember how real reporting is done.

Name the other network that persisted in covering the race-based dismissal of guilty judgements for those club-wielding voter intimitadors? Hmmmmm?

What are the real stories of the day, now?

The destruction of America by it's own government, the surrender of the United States government to Mexico, and the refusal of the states to play along, the coming disaster of massive unprecendented tax increases allowed by this congress and this president, and the failure of this president to do anything effective about the recession the government caused by meddling in the free market in the first place.

The other networks covering this?

No.

People who watch other networks know who "Snooki" is. I suspect most peole watching Fox are like me, and had to do a search to discover who Snooki was, and then wonder why anyone would give a crap about what that broad thought or felt. The opinions of people who knew what a Snooki was without searcing for it aren't really important to people interested in real news.
 
Let's put it this way:

The networks the lefties call "news" channels tried to perpuate the lie that a Fox News broadcast led to the compelled resignation of that Sherrod woman.

Screamin' Dean told FOXNEWS just that. He was immediately corrected by Mike Wallace, who said that his program was going to stick with the facts and Dean was not going to be allowed to continue with that lie on Fox.

So Dean repeated his lie on another network. Which tolerated it.

So Fox reported the NEWS, which was that Fox had not aired one word about Sherrod before the Messiah panicked and forced her to resign before Beck went on the air.

The above actions, Fox, the news channel; Dean, the typical Democrat mouthpiece; and the propaganda channels, are typical for each player, and precisely why the news channel has the huge lead in the ratings. People watch news programs to learn the truth, not hear propaganda.

Here is the difference between the "Propaganda Channels" and Fox News though; they aren't owned by Charles Kane er..um Rupert Murdoch, a self proclaimed conservative, and a bunch of people that have worked for previous Republican administrations.
 
A good time to be practical in the matter of media coverage. The Democratic Party's boycott of Fox News was utterly foolish and detrimental to their public relations.
 
Who is this Snooki person, and what does she have to do with any of this?
 
Apparently someone on a reality tv show I have never seen nor care to see. I had to do a google search on the person. I thought it was a snack or something.

It was true that more celebrity news has punctured the press (including Fox), but I would also agree CNN and a few others have been considerably worse with celebrity news coverage.
 
A good time to be practical in the matter of media coverage. The Democratic Party's boycott of Fox News was utterly foolish and detrimental to their public relations.

Agreed, it only did them more bad than good. Also I would say all of them talk way to much about **** I don't care about like Lindsay Lohan, Sarah Palin, you know whores.
 
Yep. The problem the Democratic Party had was they did not want to try to give Fox News, the conservative-biased branch, any face time because they thought they could punish the little child and make it behave properly. The problem was that they were politically alienating a more conservative branch from being in any way persuaded by their message at the same time that they decided it would be a terrific idea to alienate the number one station for news coverage. They put more fuel in the fire, convincing conservatives of any stripe that these Democrats will not pay attention to their platform, their morals or passion-and the Democrats fell right into their own trap. Now Democrats are successfully branded as those who will only do what they want to do, irregardless of the dissent. It is not enough to make people complain about your lack of cooperation, but that the numbers making it political suicide is what is most striking. That boldness is only going to work if they think it will come out good in the end, and in this case, they were clearly in the wrong and had to make amends.

I think they cover Palin by virtue of her becoming a politician before a media star.
 
Last edited:
Agreed, it only did them more bad than good. Also I would say all of them talk way to much about **** I don't care about like Lindsay Lohan, Sarah Palin, you know whores.

Real classy... you make the stereotype of Kentuckians believable....:roll:
 
Let's put it this way:

The networks the lefties call "news" channels tried to perpuate the lie that a Fox News broadcast led to the compelled resignation of that Sherrod woman.

Screamin' Dean told FOXNEWS just that. He was immediately corrected by Mike Wallace, who said that his program was going to stick with the facts and Dean was not going to be allowed to continue with that lie on Fox.

So Dean repeated his lie on another network. Which tolerated it.

So Fox reported the NEWS, which was that Fox had not aired one word about Sherrod before the Messiah panicked and forced her to resign before Beck went on the air.

The above actions, Fox, the news channel; Dean, the typical Democrat mouthpiece; and the propaganda channels, are typical for each player, and precisely why the news channel has the huge lead in the ratings. People watch news programs to learn the truth, not hear propaganda.

Anderson Cooper is now saying he is sorry and did not do his job properly for not challenging Sherrod when she called Breitbart a racist. Maybe there's hope for CNN yet. At least Cooper is trying to be honest... or is hoping for a job at Fox.
 
Real classy... you make the stereotype of Kentuckians believable....:roll:

Way to go.

Anyways, I have read on Digg that the story that Fox got that seat could possibly be innaccurate. Does anyone have any links to it?
 
Way to go.

Anyways, I have read on Digg that the story that Fox got that seat could possibly be innaccurate. Does anyone have any links to it?

Uhh... it's in the OP -- you know, the little blue text which when clicked takes you to the White House Coorespondents Association website?
 
Ah nm I found it. I was just looking at the wrong thing on their site. Their site sucks.

Why would the story be reported as inaccurate on Digg then?
 
Last edited:
Ah nm I found it. I was just looking at the wrong thing on their site. Their site sucks.

Why would the story be reported as inaccurate on Digg then?

Because Digg is wrong? Or someone is submitting Digg information that is anti-Fox? :shrug:
 
Just seems like a weird thing to report wrong is all.
 
Back
Top Bottom