• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Mexican Drug Cartel Allegedly Puts a Price on Arizona Sheriff's Head

Texmaster making a mockery of himself never gets old.

Still got nothing eh Catz? lol Amazing how willing you are to continue to embarass yourself with unsupported racism charges.

But please, continue. I love a show after lunch. :D
 
Your post is stupid. The fact of the matter is that a destabilized Mexico on our southern border and narco trafficantes pose a threat to our national security. That should be neither overstated---nor hyperbolically understated.

I Heart This Post.
 
Still got nothing eh Catz? lol Amazing how willing you are to continue to embarass yourself with unsupported racism charges.

But please, continue. I love a show after lunch. :D

Isn't that pretty much what she said without grossing us out by injecting the mental image of your jowls flapping food down your gullet?
 
Your post is stupid. The fact of the matter is that a destabilized Mexico on our southern border and narco trafficantes pose a threat to our national security. That should be neither overstated---nor hyperbolically understated.

Actually, your post doesn't really reflect a lot of intelligence either but I digress. I do not argue that our pourous borders don't need mending.

I am merely, in a typical Captain America humorous manner, trying to point out how political all this is. The GOP wants to lay the blame at Obama's feet. However, it was carefully omitted that Obama, for what it's worth, has done more to control the problem than either Bush 1 or 2 or Clinton (or even Ronnie Reagan who just said to hell with it and gave them amnesty.) That being said, he still isn't doing enough.

Also omitted are the stats that show major crime, at almost every level, is the lowest in AZ than it has been in years and years (and continues to decline.) Which makes one have to ask, if it's such a big deal now, why wasn't it a big deal when the crime stats were much worse back, say, when Bush was in office?

What it is, is another wedge issue used to distract and persuade the simple minded voter. Does that mean our borders don't need attention? Certainly not. They need LOT'S of attention. But it's about 30% less the problem it was 10 years ago and the crime numbers still fall year after year.

I want our borders as secure as the next guy. But I'm not a mushbrain that is buying into the GOP propaganda "The messkin's are coming! The messkins are coming!" False fear does not work on me.
 
Last edited:
I am merely, in a typical Captain America humorous manner, trying to point out how political all this is.

Well, you did a piss poor job of that.

The GOP wants to lay the blame at Obama's feet. However, it was carefully omitted that Obama, for what it's worth, has done more to control the problem than either Bush 1 or 2 or Clinton (or even Ronnie Reagan who just said to hell with it and gave them amnesty.) That being said, he still isn't doing enough.

Maybe you should have gone with this paragraph, instead. It's less retarded.

I'm not a mushbrain that is buying into the GOP propaganda "The messkin's are coming! The messkins are coming!" False fear does not work on me.

False fear doesn't work on me either. But putting one's head in a hole in the ground doesn't help to equip you to accurately respond to an identified problem. And, no one can really deny that the cartels have the potential to massively impact America's national security.

Your post is a false dichotomy, and even more ridiculous than the position you're trying to counter. It's sad you don't realize that.
 
Well, you did a piss poor job of that.



Maybe you should have gone with this paragraph, instead. It's less retarded.



False fear doesn't work on me either. But putting one's head in a hole in the ground doesn't help to equip you to accurately respond to an identified problem. And, no one can really deny that the cartels have the potential to massively impact America's national security.

Your post is a false dichotomy, and even more ridiculous than the position you're trying to counter. It's sad you don't realize that.

Your are insignificant to me so believe what you want to believe. Disagree if you must. Be a jerk about it too, if you must. Says more about you than it does about me.
 
Your are insignificant to me so believe what you want to believe. Disagree if you must. Be a jerk about it too, if you must. Says more about you than it does about me.

Wow. That was easier and more enjoyable than I anticipated.
 
Back to the topic:shock:

Can the new state legislation be considered a (catalyst) cause in these developments? Those who play hardball with criminals have to be prepared to get dirty. I'm not advocating softball either. Let's just say it would be wise not to play ball at all (and not for the sake of seeking euphoria either). Who's money do they have? And where did your children get it from:? Somebody already stated "America likes its drugs" to some degree?
 
Goldenboy219 said:
it would be wise not to play ball at all

Blasphemy! The only way to prevent the moles from popping their heads out is to keep on feeding quarters into the drug cartel whack-a-mole machine!
 
A huge part of this illegal immigration law in AZ is designed to stop the massive amounts of drug trafficking that is being ignored from coming across their borders.

Yeah, and it's not going to work either. Only legalization of recreational drugs is going to stop drug trafficking. Legalization of recreational drugs will also put a stop to illegal immigration since it will provide a source of revenue to Latin America so they can build up their own domestic economy.

Tough illegal immigration laws will never reduce the power of drug cartels. Only legalization of recreational drugs will, and will reduce illegal immigration as well.
 
Yeah, and it's not going to work either. Only legalization of recreational drugs is going to stop drug trafficking. Legalization of recreational drugs will also put a stop to illegal immigration since it will provide a source of revenue to Latin America so they can build up their own domestic economy.

Tough illegal immigration laws will never reduce the power of drug cartels. Only legalization of recreational drugs will, and will reduce illegal immigration as well.

That's a nice thought, but the U.S. is highly unlikely to legalize methamphetamine, cocaine, or other hardcore drugs. Marijuana is another subject. So, as a drug dealer client of mine once told me:

"there will always be someone to sell to, and something to sell."

Yes, legalizing marijuana would take a huge chunk of profits away from the cartels, but it would hardly put them out of business.
 
Isn't that pretty much what she said without grossing us out by injecting the mental image of your jowls flapping food down your gullet?

Still got nothing I see. No direct quotes from her and no factual evidence showing how she is racist in any way shape or form. Thanks for reminding me.

You can run along now. :)
 
Last edited:
Still got nothing I see. No direct quotes from her and no factual evidence showing how she is racist in any way shape or form. Thanks for reminding me.

You can run along now. :)

Let me give you a hint. Read Hatuey's post. It contains a direct quote from Jan Brewer.

Are you really this inept?

Talk about an entitlement mentality....Do you really require us to do your thinking for you, Tex?
 
Let me give you a hint. Read Hatuey's post. It contains a direct quote from Jan Brewer.

Are you really this inept?

Talk about an entitlement mentality....Do you really require us to do your thinking for you, Tex?

Are you really so unfamiliar with basic debating skills you don't know to back up dumbass racist charges you make?

You want rest your claim on Hatuey's quote? I can't say I'm surprised considering the stupidity of that argument.

Republican candidate Matt Jette said that most people who cross illegally into Arizona are "just trying to feed their families." Brewer, according to the Arizona Republic, disputed that, saying, "They're coming here, and they're bringing drugs. And they're doing drop houses, and they're extorting people and they're terrorizing the families."

#1 She never mentions a single race

FAIL

#2 Of course some are bringing drugs in

FAIL

#3 Of course some are extorting people and terrorizing families. Again NO race mentioned AT ALL

FAIL

Lets take other comments from that debate

""majority of the illegal trespassers that are coming (into) the state of Arizona are under the direction and control of organized drug cartels."

A FACTUAL statement a NO mention of RACE. Again your epic fail is entertaining but pathetic you thought this would prove racism.

Why am I not surprised it took you 3 pages to point to this pathetic attempt to call her a racist.

Here's a clue Catz. You actually have to call out a SINGLE RACE before you can claim the person is a racist! LOL

Talk about pathetic. Next time just run away like you normally do from the truth because now that we know what you were resting your argument on it shows how pathetically weak your claim was.

Its no surprise you threw out the race card since it fits with your attempts to attack those you don't agree with politically but for God's sake have something better to hang your hat on than a governor saying illegals bring in drugs without ever mentioning a single race.
 
Last edited:
Most of our best assassination squads in the Americas work hand in hand with the drug cartels....

must not report truth on interweb no one knows who is watching......
 
Ummm, yeah she did. Go back up and read Hatuey's posts and then hers in conjunction.

Reading is fundamental.

My life here has gotten significantly easier since I stopped responding to the demands of idiots who can't be bothered to read a thread and get up to speed on a discussion before participating. It's one thing when the thread is 60 pages long, but someone who can't be bothered to read five ****ing pages is just ridiculous.
 
My life here has gotten significantly easier since I stopped responding to the demands of idiots who can't be bothered to read a thread and get up to speed on a discussion before participating. It's one thing when the thread is 60 pages long, but someone who can't be bothered to read five ****ing pages is just ridiculous.

I've also learned that with certain jackasses, it doesn't matter if you quote, link and draw a picture, they will still sit there and deny that it is there anyway.
 
That's a nice thought, but the U.S. is highly unlikely to legalize methamphetamine, cocaine, or other hardcore drugs. Marijuana is another subject. So, as a drug dealer client of mine once told me:

"there will always be someone to sell to, and something to sell."

Yes, legalizing marijuana would take a huge chunk of profits away from the cartels, but it would hardly put them out of business.

While the U.S. may be unlikely to legalize all recreational drugs realistically, I still support such a move precisely because doing so would put those cartels out of business.
 
While the U.S. may be unlikely to legalize all recreational drugs realistically, I still support such a move precisely because doing so would put those cartels out of business.

I support legalizing Marijuana, but doing so would not put the cartels out of business.
 
Back
Top Bottom