• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

White House apologizes to ousted official

Most folks understand, partisan hacks notwithstanding, that the rightwing propaganda machine is slanted, misleading and outright lies in order to give their sheeple what they want. That's all well and good. It's sells advertising and musters a market base. We can't really expect much more from their followers.

But I do find it sorely disappointing, and downright scary, that our leaders in Washington were gullable enough to fall for their crap. Those people monitor the "red phone" and have their hand next to the "red button." I would expect them to be a bit smarter than the rightwing, spoonfed, sheeple. Appearantly, they are not.

If there is anything positive about this is that they are righting wrongs and making amends. And, it is also a glowing example of how our rightwing media machine lies, slants, spins their propaganda just to satisfy their America hating, disgruntled followers. I expect the RW sheeple to swallow their media spew hook, line and sinker. The get no points for intelligence. Never have. But the people in high office should know better. The common man on the street does (rightwing zealots notwithstanding. They believe anything that pleases their ear.)

What I find disappointing is your claim that only "right wing" news reported this sorry event. ALL news media reported it ! Fox News did nothing more and nothing less than CNN did.

It was the Obama administration that jumped the gun on this, and especially the NAACP. I find it disgusting that the NAACP would jump on Sherrod's case when they had easy access to the entire speech. They then had the unmitigated gall to blame Fox for their own stupidity.
 
I don't recall saying she was a racist now, but I'm not going to go through the thread in double check. If I did, I was wrong.

My post about hypocrisy was in response to someone else, and then you responded by saying that what she said and did in the past was racist... I responded that your comment had nothing to do with my post about hypocrisy, and we all got confused after that. Sorry.
 
My post about hypocrisy was in response to someone else, and then you responded by saying that what she said and did in the past was racist... I responded that your comment had nothing to do with my post about hypocrisy, and we all got confused after that. Sorry.

Heh, it's all good. :p
 
I don't get where the "right-wing media" comes into play here. A video was released - it wasn't the full video, but it wasn't anything more than a video, for people to make of it what they would make of it. And the NAACP reacted more quickly and hastily than the "right-wing media" at Fox News apparently were told to:
Bill O'Reilly apologizes to Shirley Sherrod for 'not doing my homework' | Show Tracker | Los Angeles Times


The story created the hype, not the other way around; nobody is at fault for "hyping" the tape, and if they are, then the hype comes from both the left and the right.

The rightwing media set the ball in motion. The blame falls SQUARELY on THEIR shoulders. And I believe it was intentional. Either they did not vet the story and check for accuracy or they did and decided to run with it anyways. I think it was the latter. Their viewers eat it up too.

This is the same media that was assisting Bush and his minions in decieving the nation, and congress, to lead us into a war with Iraq. They have no honor OR credibility and I think they are a scurge upon American society. Such is the pitfall of freedom of speech, I suppose. I wish a pox upon their traitorous house. And those that support their programming and sponsors are just one step above those who support terrorism in my humble opinion.
 
Based-on her speech, do you believe Sherrod to be racist? It's a simple question.

The litmus test is: If a White person said the things Sherrod did or is now saying - do you believe based on the speech the White woman or White man for that matter would be labeled a racist?

I think Yes, they probably would. Given Sherrod's extrodinary life though --- I think I can forgive her language because I don't think she knows better. Some people are just racist without ever knowing it - others are too sensitive about every little word used that they become outraged. We have to be somewhere in the middle.
 
The rightwing media set the ball in motion. The blame falls SQUARELY on THEIR shoulders. And I believe it was intentional. Either they did not vet the story and check for accuracy or they did and decided to run with it anyways. I think it was the latter. Their viewers eat it up too.

This is the same media that was assisting Bush and his minions in decieving the nation, and congress, to lead us into a war with Iraq. They have no honor OR credibility and I think they are a scurge upon American society. Such is the pitfall of freedom of speech, I suppose. I wish a pox upon their traitorous house. And those that support their programming and sponsors are just one step above those who support terrorism in my humble opinion.

The media didn't call Sherrod three times and insist on a resignation or initially over-react. That was the White House and the NAACP.
 
The rightwing media set the ball in motion. The blame falls SQUARELY on THEIR shoulders. And I believe it was intentional. Either they did not vet the story and check for accuracy or they did and decided to run with it anyways. I think it was the latter. Their viewers eat it up too.

This is the same media that was assisting Bush and his minions in decieving the nation, and congress, to lead us into a war with Iraq. They have no honor OR credibility and I think they are a scurge upon American society. Such is the pitfall of freedom of speech, I suppose. I wish a pox upon their traitorous house. And those that support their programming and sponsors are just one step above those who support terrorism in my humble opinion.

Who are you calling the "right wing media"???? The ONLY mention of this episode before she was fired was the single web site of Breitbart.

Fox News did not air anything about this until AFTER she was fired.
 
Wow, amazing... and clueless, apparently.

This whole case is about liberals doing something about someone who (wrongly) was accused of being racists against whites. They DID something, and the woman was (wrongly) fired.

Now, you give me an example of the opposite, and we'll see who is the hypocrite.

Actually this is as good as anyplace to start. When THIS case hit I was the first to say it was a bull**** hit piece...did so the day before. I dont watch fox news...dont listen to ANY of the wingers...left or right...and I kinda try to call it like it is...not pick and choose which pieces are conveeeeeenient for my points. Hypocrisy...not on MY side..

Now you...how many of YOUR posts contain the words "right wing" in your condemnations? When the story broke that racists wouldnt be prosecuted and every media outlet seems to ignore it...were you inflammed about that injustice or did you defend it because...oh yeah...YOUR side...

Yeah...I'll play the 'who is a hypocrite' game with you any day of the week. Course...I have the advantage of seeing how you play for quite a while...
 
C'mon man. I was VERY careful to single out the rightwing "zealots and sheep" so as to NOT paint conservatism with one paint brush. Most thinking conservatives know better than to listen to that O'Reilly, Hannity, and Beck spew. BUT, there is no shortage of those who do not.

The sad part is, even after this blatant display of rightwing propaganda tactics, there are some that will still swear by the aforementioned media hacks. They let people piss in their hair and convince them it's raining. But what can ya do? Stupidity is still legal here in the USA. One only has to be of legal age to vote. Intelligence has no bearing on the right to vote. America. Gotta love it!

I listen to all of them. I think Beck get's a bit weird sometimes with his theories, but he also makes good points sometimes. Limbaugh is a sexist pig, but does make good points at times also. Same with the others. I think singling out 'right wing propganda' from the 1 conservative network out there is a bit innapropriate also as everyone reported on this issue and the left certainly has it's sheeple following their own media hacks. I don't know why this debate turned into right/left thing.
 
The rightwing media set the ball in motion. The blame falls SQUARELY on THEIR shoulders. And I believe it was intentional. Either they did not vet the story and check for accuracy or they did and decided to run with it anyways. I think it was the latter. Their viewers eat it up too.

This is the same media that was assisting Bush and his minions in decieving the nation, and congress, to lead us into a war with Iraq. They have no honor OR credibility and I think they are a scurge upon American society. Such is the pitfall of freedom of speech, I suppose. I wish a pox upon their traitorous house. And those that support their programming and sponsors are just one step above those who support terrorism in my humble opinion.

Thats pretty chicken**** if you ask me. "The Right Wing Media" consists of...what exactly? Fox News and a few internet sites? So you are saying you and apparently the White House and NAACP are THAT stupid to just get whambooozled by them? Reeeeally?

I wonder...if Fox news is the vast "right wing" media complex what you must think of the rest...
 
Who are you calling the "right wing media"???? The ONLY mention of this episode before she was fired was the single web site of Breitbart.

Fox News did not air anything about this until AFTER she was fired.

from beck's transcript:

Has it — has it hit anybody else that's the way the English say charade? Sherrod. Hmm. Just like the lady's name in this. Sherrod.

i find it odd that he said this, why do you think he did?
 
I agree with that -- a right wing blogger may have started it, but both left and right take the blame for buying it without checking. The media is supposed to be a watchdog, but it's a damned lazy one.

Here is a clip of that snarky Maddow commenting on this. I put her right up there with Hannity and O'Reilly as far as biased journalism goes, however, I do have to give her research department props in as much as their research goes (albeit, ALWAYS reporting what the left wing wants to hear.) But she is, at least, credible. (I still can't stand her though.)

But in the order of how and the way this issue came to be, is covered by here and it matches with my observations as well.

 
Last edited:
Here is a clip of that snarky Maddow commenting on this. I put her right up there with Hannity and O'Reilly as far as biased journalism goes, however, I do have to give her research department props in as much as their research goes (albeit, ALWAYS reporting what the left wing wants to hear.) But she is, at least, credible. (I still can't stand her though.)

But in the order of how and the way this issue came to be, is covered by here and it matches with my observations as well.



she is credible, and always corrects anything she might get wrong.
 
Thats pretty chicken**** if you ask me. "The Right Wing Media" consists of...what exactly? Fox News and a few internet sites? So you are saying you and apparently the White House and NAACP are THAT stupid to just get whambooozled by them? Reeeeally?

I wonder...if Fox news is the vast "right wing" media complex what you must think of the rest...

When I think of rightwing media, of course I think of FAUXNews. I think of O'Reilly, Hannity, Limbaugh, Beck, and the sort. Is there even a credible rightwing media outlet out there? I would LOVE to learn about it.

Somehow, I can't visualize a sucessfull "fair and balanced" rightwing media outlet that is truthful and credible. I don't see how it could be sucessful given their viewership, but I digress.

Anyways, give me some links to some credible rightwing media and I will study and reconsider.
 
from beck's transcript:



i find it odd that he said this, why do you think he did?

What is it with some people always quoting Beck and then telling us how he is biased. No ****! He is a talk show host, NOT a reporter, NOT a journalist.
 
from beck's transcript:



i find it odd that he said this, why do you think he did?

Provide a link so I can see it in context and I'll be glad to give my opinion. I don't watch or listen to Beck, so I don't have a clue what he was talking about. Other posters have said he didn't buy the story from the beginning.
 
she is credible, and always corrects anything she might get wrong.

I know. But if she wasn't so mockingly snarky, she'd be a LOT easier to watch. I don't recall her doing much reporting of the screw-ups on the left side of the aisle. But quick to jump on the right. Granted, her facts are facts. I'm just saying she is selective as to which facts she chooses to present. She only reports issues that put the right in a bad light, no?
 
What is it with some people always quoting Beck and then telling us how he is biased. No ****! He is a talk show host, NOT a reporter, NOT a journalist.

correct! however, many of the right don't seem to know that, and for what's it's worth, he is also a political activist. a loony one at that.
 
When I think of rightwing media, of course I think of FAUXNews. I think of O'Reilly, Hannity, Limbaugh, Beck, and the sort. Is there even a credible rightwing media outlet out there? I would LOVE to learn about it.

Somehow, I can't visualize a sucessfull "fair and balanced" rightwing media outlet that is truthful and credible. I don't see how it could be sucessful given their viewership, but I digress.

Anyways, give me some links to some credible rightwing media and I will study and reconsider.

These ARE TALK SHOWS, not news. Whine about their actual news if you want, but calling their talk show hosts biased does nothing. Of course they can't be relied on to be fair, they aren't there to report the news!

By your standards there isn't any credible left wing media either as they all have their biased talk show hosts as well.
 
What is it with some people always quoting Beck and then telling us how he is biased. No ****! He is a talk show host, NOT a reporter, NOT a journalist.

Good point. But they STILL call it "FOXNews." That's kinda decieving, no? It should be called "FOXOpinions."
 
correct! however, many of the right don't seem to know that, and for what's it's worth, he is also a political activist. a loony one at that.

So your deciding to participate in the ignorance by discussing them as though they are a new source?
 
These ARE TALK SHOWS, not news. Whine about their actual news if you want, but calling their talk show hosts biased does nothing. Of course they can't be relied on to be fair, they aren't there to report the news!

By your standards there isn't any credible left wing media either as they all have their biased talk show hosts as well.

actually it's great to see you post this.
 
Good point. But they STILL call it "FOXNews." That's kinda decieving, no? It should be called "FOXOpinions."

Umm they still call it CNN or MSNBC when their talk shows are on, do they not? Fox news is the name of the station. They should rename themselves every time they put on a talk show and then change it back everytime they switch to a new program??
 
These ARE TALK SHOWS, not news. Whine about their actual news if you want, but calling their talk show hosts biased does nothing. Of course they can't be relied on to be fair, they aren't there to report the news!

By your standards there isn't any credible left wing media either as they all have their biased talk show hosts as well


Absolutely. NOW you're hearing what I'm saying.

But this episode was initially brought to you by the rightwing propaganda outlets.

There is no shortage of leftwing bias either. But that's another thread altogether.
 
Back
Top Bottom