- Joined
- Feb 1, 2010
- Messages
- 88,600
- Reaction score
- 39,611
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
Not really, actually, quite intellectually dishonest. No WBI [body imaging] DNOES NOT EQUATE to no security measures. Thew people who opt out still get checked. If something were to go wrong, I wouldn't go about saying "oh, so-and-so should be done, such and such should have to do XYZ..." no, I would find the problem and fix it - fire incompetent people [plenty in the TSA] if possible, change policies, etc, not look for more reasons to make the airport security check needlessly invasive and time consuming for the passengers.
BTW: the chance of getting killed in a plane crash by terrorists is on par [of not more unlikely] than getting struck by lightning. Blind supporters of this call the opposition fear mongers, yet are willing to support putting in technology that hasn't been completely tested, not completely proven effective or safe, in place for a microscopic possibility and condemn those who oppose with all sorts of hysterical emotional games. Kinda ironic really.
I call bull****. Im no FAN of Obama but I know damn good and well and I suspect you do too that people would be lining up to blame him for not doing everything he can and the TSA could to keep people safe. I'll take you at your word...you say YOU wouldnt...OK...fine...but seriously...You REALLy dont think people would?
Like I said I typically fly about 30 times a year. Bring on the scanners.