• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Outrage over ruling that mom who strangled daughter won’t be jailed

I just want to mention, that the debate happening in Canada is not discussing the mother's religion whatsoever. In fact, the first mention of Islam I have heard in relation to this case was when I first came to this thread. People are annoyed with the obvious flaw in the ruling: that a mother strangled her daughter in a pre-meditated fashion and only got three year's probation. Wtf is wrong with the system?
 
Dr_Patrick said:
The OP didn't mention religion at all. I realize some liberals here are ultra paranoid about some of the conservatives around here who have made posts in the past about being anti-Muslim, but this is ridiculous. By bringing it up first out of paranoia, you are no different than those that you criticize. I don't think religion has a single thing to do with this topic at all. The bottom line is that this woman strangled her daughter. I think we can all agree that it is outrageous that she won't be jailed for committing this horrible crime.
Click to expand...

The OP didn't, the news source did. The OP would not have even seen the story mentioned in the news if the woman was not a Muslim.
 
The Dane said:
The OP didn't, the news source did. The OP would not have even seen the story mentioned in the news if the woman was not a Muslim.
Click to expand...

And you know this...how? Your assertions are baseless.
 
It does seem very odd. As someone previously pointed out, rendering her unconscious would have sufficed for self-defense purposes. Death by strangulation is something else entirely IMHO.
 
The Dane said:
Its the same stupid prejudice as muslim mosques going up in American cities. Nobody cares except retarded faux news recipetents who think Muslims are naturally dangerous people.

The fact that she was a Muslim was completely irrelevant but it was used to catch people's attention to make a bull**** news story.

"If it bleeds it leads."
Click to expand...

The only ones upset about this OP are ****tarded Islamic Supremacists and their women hating apologists. If a mother murdering her own daughter is only only on the front pages when its a Muslim then I suppose that woman in Texas murdering her children or the Casey Anthony story weren't headline news for months and it was all just a figment of our imagination. Now back to your regularly scheduled woman hating and apologetics.
 
Agent Ferris said:
The only ones upset about this OP are ****tarded Islamic Supremacists and their women hating apologists. If a mother murdering her own daughter is only only on the front pages when its a Muslim then I suppose that woman in Texas murdering her children or the Casey Anthony story weren't headline news for months and it was all just a figment of our imagination. Now back to your regularly scheduled woman hating and apologetics.
Click to expand...

No one was saying that Ferris, once again you prove your dogmatism.

No one was apologising for the murder of the child, their point was ONLY that Texmaster wouldn't have posted this story, if it wasn't about a Muslim.

Now that might be true, but since he didn't comment on that part, I felt it best to just focus on the story, others felt differently that is their right.

But that doesn't give you the right to start blasting everyone as a "Islamic Supremacists and their women hating apologists".

That's simply not true.
 
The Dane said:
I've been on alot of political forums, about 4-5 of them for periods of 6 months to a year. You know what never suprises me? Its that on every single forum there's always alot of members who are extremely lazy with their arguments and they consistently think again and again that short, one liner responses coupled with annoying and sarcastic responses qualifies as a valid and logical argument. I won't bother to respond to any of your posts unless you put in the time and effort to make valid points instead of cheap political hackery.
Click to expand...

You know what else is on every forum? Apologists for every violent act perpetrated by Muslims.
 
Jetboogieman said:
No one was saying that Ferris, once again you prove your dogmatism.

No one was apologising for the murder of the child, their point was ONLY that Texmaster wouldn't have posted this story, if it wasn't about a Muslim.

Now that might be true, but since he didn't comment on that part, I felt it best to just focus on the story, others felt differently that is their right.

But that doesn't give you the right to start blasting everyone as a "Islamic Supremacists and their women hating apologists".

That's simply not true.
Click to expand...

Oh I notice you don't get on him for calling those of us who do care "retarded faux news recipients." :roll: So save your selective moral outrage for someone who doesn't see right through these deflecting apologists.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom